Remundo wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:
Well, maybe it's time to change the subject:
EDF has no trouble getting through the winter. France is even a power exporter.
now yes because it is very mild and that a few plants have left.
Maybe not for long...
Remundo wrote:Exnihiloest wrote:
Well, maybe it's time to change the subject:
EDF has no trouble getting through the winter. France is even a power exporter.
now yes because it is very mild and that a few plants have left.
SebastianL wrote:e]
- he does not have to make the community pay for his storage, nor lower the profitability of nuclear power. for this he is free to subscribe to a commercial offer that will put him in touch with EV or other chargers. DimmableCHRG and DimmableINJ are supplied by the "transformer" node.....
sicetaitsimple wrote:SebastianL wrote:e]
- he does not have to make the community pay for his storage, nor lower the profitability of nuclear power. for this he is free to subscribe to a commercial offer that will put him in touch with EV or other chargers. DimmableCHRG and DimmableINJ are supplied by the "transformer" node.....
Well, you are flying at an altitude where few people can still breathe....
In practice, for an individual, it's already complicated to choose between tariffs with say a maximum of 6 different horo-seasonal tariffs. In general it's base or HP/HC, sometimes WE hours, I've also seen a rate with "super-off-peak" hours between 2am and 6am if I remember correctly, Tempo with 6 different rates in the year.
So, your ideas with automatic reduction of drawdown power or limitation of PV injection according to what is happening on the network and dynamic pricing, for an individual, you can make a thesis of it and it will certainly be interesting to put on a shelf .
This kind of optimization only concerns very large consumers who are able to devote resources to this type of market activity.
SebastianL wrote:There is no complication for the user, why do we have "hourly" packages?
sicetaitsimple wrote:SebastianL wrote:There is no complication for the user, why do we have "hourly" packages?
To know at what time or on what day the rates change, and thus be able to adapt your consumption in a somewhat programmed way, of course! I know, it might sound basic, but for the average individual, it's usually enough.
SebastianL wrote:and that his supplier will be able to provide him with a better average price.
sicetaitsimple wrote:SebastianL wrote:and that his supplier will be able to provide him with a better average price.
It's completely theoretical, because the corollary of your diagram is that the said supplier has a supply mainly based on short-term purchases at the "market price", and not a more classic supply based on stacking contracts (and/or its own production) with more or less long term supplemented by a minority share of purchases at the "market price".
I let you imagine what it would have been like in recent months for someone who would have signed a contract like the one you are proposing....
SebastianL wrote:It is true that it is a beautiful mess this market price:
sicetaitsimple wrote:SebastianL wrote:It is true that it is a beautiful mess this market price:
You're very nice, but at some point you have to find a certain coherence at the level of the complete system, "your" smart grid is only a brick.
The economic model of "your" smart grid can only work on the basis of substantial and repetitive short-term deviations in market prices.
So no need to talk about "nice shit", either we have a very short-term marginal price set by a stock exchange which, perhaps imperfectly, sets a price resulting from supply and demand at a given moment, or we return to monopolistic systems where it is the monopoly operator, regulated by the State, who says what is the right price for electricity delivered on such a day and at such a time of the year.
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 156 guests