Jean Louis Naudin and U-generator Richard Vialle

[Substitute1]

I understand, I am rather open on the subject.
What are you basing yourself on to be so confident, when there is no functional achievement to prove your words?
Every time we see something come out, it ends up making people shudder.
Personally, I would use the conditional a lot, rather than the affirmative

Sorry for the cross-posting.
PS: private joke but funny that this subject is completely dug up now.

[peter]

When he is passionate he goes all out.
He must have realized that it was a dead end since he gave up everything at the end of 2012.

I found his trace on https://twitter.com/jlnaudin

Too bad you need an account to follow it on touiteur...

“He must have realized that it was a dead end since he gave up everything at the end of 2012.”

My intuition will tell me that, given its tests and measurements,
he didn't know how to keep the "track" hot... to go further.

We must not forget that the Vialle assembly (U-shaped) ... from the point of view of certain "experts",
ONLY acts on what is known...
So, Electrons and Protons, atomic electrostatic fields, orbits, oscillations of electrons, etc...

Nowhere have I been able to read tests of Energy Transfer between 2 half-Us!
Nor read anything about the KINETIC Overload of Electrons and Nuclei...
Nor the effect on the VOID full of Energy BETWEEN each copper atom...
in short...etc!

There are paths to follow, to improve the principle... in PLENTY!

[Substitute1]

Personally, I applied the Vialle Principle to a conductive fluid.
While remaining logical in the design, respecting polarities (opposites attract),
it only took 5 seconds to make the liquid boil and produce such an important "current" return
than the power cables. we melted.

In the absence of reflexes, I would currently have no home (fire).
I also pay tribute to R. Vialle who guided my steps.

Did you have a “liquid bar”, or “2 half liquid bars”?

[peter]

I understand, I am rather open on the subject.
What are you basing yourself on to be so confident, when there is no functional achievement to prove your words?

"...while no functional achievement proves your words"

Logical statement for those absent during the tests!

[peter]

Personally, I applied the Vialle Principle to a conductive fluid.
While remaining logical in the design, respecting polarities (opposites attract),
it only took 5 seconds to make the liquid boil and produce such an important "current" return
than the power cables. we melted.

In the absence of reflexes, I would currently have no home (fire).
I also pay tribute to R. Vialle who guided my steps.

Did you have a “liquid bar”, or “2 half liquid bars”?

I'm sorry, I can't answer your question,
the PIXELS here are not sufficient proof for you.

[Substitute1]

I see I see.
What is the point of coming to forum if it's to make announcements and ultimately not say anything interesting, not answer questions?

[peter]

I see I see.
What is the point of coming to forum if it's to make announcements and ultimately not say anything interesting, not answer questions?

Interesting remark:

- “the interest in coming to forum "
- “finally say nothing interesting”
- “do not answer questions”

I came,
I "dropped" tracks",
share my own experiences,
and answered questions.

1 - it seems that we cannot help others to cultivate Intuition and Imagination by giving clues... too bad.
However, it is necessary to move forward.
2 - the pixels displayed are not sufficient proof, we see the rate of interest in the main subject...
and therefore the requests for the “Ready-made kit” ready to serve to customers banging on the table while moaning “I’m hungry, something to eat!”
3 - there will always be answers that are not suitable due to lack of "evidence" and serving everything on a silver platter...

However, it is reserved for children to have fits of dissatisfaction...

“I see, I see” is a “formula” usually reserved for psychiatrists...

[peter]

The Vialle principle applies to ALL Atoms!

If too few people can assimilate this, there will be few results, that's logical.

[Substitute1]

“I see, I see” is a “formula” usually reserved for psychiatrists...

I see, I see, I probably missed my vocation

So I would complete with “I saw, thank you, I am not interested in illusionists, showmen”.
Concrete, even via pixel?

[peter]

“I see, I see” is a “formula” usually reserved for psychiatrists...

I see, I see, I probably missed my vocation

So I would complete with “I saw, thank you, I am not interested in illusionists, showmen”.
Concrete, even via pixel?

We have to accept the fact that sharing information here is only possible through pixels.
There is no concrete possible on pixels.

However, since the Vialle subject interests you, we can use the principle stated/published by JLNaudin for his “NextGén v1.2” replication.
The atoms are in an electrostatic field.

For a metal, it's a bit "frozen" as an ES field... no wonder the metal, at room temperature, is frozen too.
No wonder the amount of energy needed to start a resonance.

For a fluid, it is easier...its natural resonance "frequencies" being higher, it is normal for its ES field to behave
like a...FLUID!

Clearly, the higher the frequencies, the more the ES Field goes from "Solid" (more or less, it's never fixed in fact)
a “Fluid”,
then moreover then "Gas-Fluid",
then “Gazeux”, then “Gazeux a Sticky”!
Yes yes...sticky!
then we move beyond what science is ready to accept (instantaneous teleportation of energy, etc...)

We are not far from the symbolic similarities of the Aether.