...(naive) even when he touches it?

If it makes you happy 8): "Only the last two lines return to calva, so not too convoluted and rather simple to read. The first link following the answer is there to explain why he came to talk about a famous Calvados. The second link cites his answer, reread...

Certainly, but the meaning is there and it is presented very clearly...

When it comes to alcohol, what's more normal than convoluted?
That said, I am aware that quite a few people here are not very sensitive (euphemism!) to nuances...

Excellent analysis of Pierreduchemin, I completely subscribe to it. Calm words would undoubtedly be preferable, but between direct language because without filters and cunning maneuvers and false insinuations, my preference clearly goes to the first...

Objectivity remains tainted by a serious bias: as I have already mentioned, the liar who gets us drunk from his Bistro-du-Kremlin, strives to please the hard core by abounding in their meaning (which those concerned call it "positive content"!), this with a robust and persistent...

Perhaps Obistro-of-the-kremlin does he want to suggest that we progress in conclusive doubt?

“The dogs are barking, the caravan is passing (the floodgates too!)”.
Being accused of treason by a compulsive liar is an unintentional compliment, but a welcome one...

"Being tolerated (accepted?) by the pack requires howling with the wolves, as well as the diligent practice of grooming..."

If he could not engage in "denigration of people" what would he have left to exist? You are harsh, Remundo!