No, nothing.....Just a little consistency problem.

Remundo wrote:Take a Renault Super 5 with 500 balls of 800 kg

Progress is beautiful, eh!

Your Golf GTE weighs at least double....

That Christophe suddenly mentions "biological filing", while boasting of his "performance", is not my doing.....

Apart from French Civil Society in the context of redistribution through social security, there is a business family which has a huge interest in reducing road mortality: insurance. Under cover of a proposition that no one can dispute as well-founded: ...

Fortunately it's April 1st, however: they would be able to do so just to please an obscure lobby... Which one? Thank you Guy for this enlightening remark... Knowing that there are around 10 lobbyists for 1 parliamentarian, who could have the most interest in such a measure? Personally...

Take a Renault Super 5 with 500 balls of 800 kg and 40L of gasoline and you can travel at 130 km/h for 500 km, refueling in 5 minutes... It's great progress, eh! I had a super 5 about 40 years ago... Well, it was better not to have a serious accident with it... In short, being overweight...

It could be half for the owner, half for you. It's a common deal.

PS: moreover, I don't think I intervened, at least in the technical aspects of your equipment. No bad trial...

Christophe wrote:I took out the drone to quantify the construction site a little...I estimate from this photo that there are in fact between 450 and 550 fir trees (I counted around 30 piles with between 15 and 20 fir trees in piles...)

And what happens to them? Are you bringing them home?

Basically, would a general limitation of 100km/h be a tragedy? I don't think so, or you have to explain to me why.

Remundo wrote:the NIST study is a smokescreen without a name. But eating the NIST flies is a good test of becoming a combat Covidist.

Because you are a specialist in the resistance of large metal structures to fire?