VetusLignum wrote:nico239 wrote:VetusLignum wrote:
Yes, everything is in the link.
Which one ?
https://thenutrientcompany.com/blogs/ho ... lants-list
Impec I will review my names of flowers and vegetables in English
VetusLignum wrote:nico239 wrote:VetusLignum wrote:
Yes, everything is in the link.
Which one ?
https://thenutrientcompany.com/blogs/ho ... lants-list
VetusLignum wrote:And then the proposed varieties have not generally been selected on their ability to get mycorrhizer.
VetusLignum wrote:
I thought especially of an inoculation near the raspberries and the blackthorn. And there, it is difficult to put only on one half.
Did67 wrote:Small remark again: we classify in "endomycrohiza" or "ectomycorrhiza", but I am not sure that there are not tens, hundreds (?), Thousands (?????) of species different! It would even seem logical to me.
Did67 wrote:VetusLignum wrote:And then the proposed varieties have not generally been selected on their ability to get mycorrhizer.
Indeed !!!
And even if I use some, it is the big fear that one can have compared to the "modern varieties" (it does not matter whether they are hybrids or stable varieties): by dint of having been selected in stations with treatments / fertilizations etc, they may have lost the ability to get mycorrhizer, or to get mycorhizer effectively ?????
Being under perf in the station, in any case, the effectiveness to be mycorhizer could not be expressed!
Do varieties establish better mycorrhizal symbiosis than others? It would seem so, through this study conducted by Swiss researchers on wheat varieties in the middle of the 1990 years. They compared the effect of the addition of a mycorrhizal fungus on several varieties of wheat, some considered as old because dating from before 1975 and the others more recent, obtained after 1975.
The result is quite clear and gives us some idea of the direction taken by the varietal selection: 8 so-called old varieties on 11 have had a yield gain with mycorrhization. In varieties after 1975, they are only 1 on 11!
What some researchers like D. Wipf are trying to alert. But beware, the specialist wishes to remind that no variety, despite the selection, has lost its ability to associate with the fungus. Simply, it is the performance of this ability that has been diminished.
http://www.agroforesterie.fr/base/press ... coagra.pdf
Moindreffor wrote:little question,
what is the difference between rye and winter wheat?
because I know farmers who sow winter wheat and I find it hard to find rye
Did67 wrote:Moindreffor wrote:little question,
what is the difference between rye and winter wheat?
because I know farmers who sow winter wheat and I find it hard to find rye
Wheat has been genetically extremely shortened; it produces less biomass. Much less.
Rye is still a little more resistant to cold and "grows" more in low temperatures ...
Have you looked in an "organic" store if you can not find bags of "organic" rye in grains ??? At home, I find it easily.
especially, for the most part, they do not have to make the funds of drawers to finish the month because their food and their cover is assured to them free by daddy, mom! But when they will have to assume financially, they will turn from green to yellow! or continue to live on the hooks of their parents GJ.I like, their slogan, to young people for the climate !!!
"When I grow up I want to be alive"
There, they turn yellow jackets ...
Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 153 guests