dedeleco wrote:Ce"Justified chorus of Dedeleco"
has a fundamental problem: I am the only one to say it, not even the thoroughbred ecologists, nor the greens, nor GreenPeace, nor econology, ....
Why do we feel like you're pulling the blanket "a bit"
dedeleco wrote:Ce"Justified chorus of Dedeleco"
has a fundamental problem: I am the only one to say it, not even the thoroughbred ecologists, nor the greens, nor GreenPeace, nor econology, ....
chatelot16 wrote:well yes nuclear is too expensive
https://www.econologie.com/forums/sortir-du- ... 0-290.html
price of the epr of flamanville: 6millard euro
power 1 650 MW
6 Geuro / 1 MW = 650 euro / W
therefore the same construction price as photovoltaics ... except that with photovoltaics there are no operating costs, no risk, no waste, no security costs paid by the state ...
of course the photovoltaic does not work day and night ... but by calculating the nuclear well is soon an economic error
chatelot16 wrote:it is better not to stop all expenditure in the nuclear industry, and to invest everything in new energy, by letting the nuclear industry continue to save: that would be the direct route to the accident
you must therefore continue to manage the nuclear with maximum security and only Stop to build another
chatelot16 wrote:we can't stop it immediately today! catastrophic lack of electricity
it is better not to stop all expenditure in the nuclear industry, and to invest everything in new energy, by letting the nuclear industry continue to save: that would be the direct route to the accident
chatelot16 wrote:We must therefore continue to manage the nuclear with maximum security and only stop building other
chatelot16 wrote:I'm afraid it's too late to stop Flamanville ... we really have to be sure that this is the last
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 261 guests