Bernard Bigot and nuclear waste
"Trust us"
The Japanese also said that when they built Fukushima ...
"Trust us"
phil53 wrote:sen-no-sen; I am not a scientist but I am able to understand that 2 major accidents in 20 years prove that it is almost a certainty that another will arrive more or less quickly and more probably where there are the most reactors.
phil53 wrote:sen-no-sen; I am not a scientist but I am able to understand that 2 major accidents in 20 years prove that it is almost a certainty that another will arrive more or less quickly and more probably where there are the most reactors.
Strictly speaking, I would understand that instead of ITR these billions are wasted studying Thorium nuclear energy
But the industrial application of nuclear fusion * still faces major technological challenges which will require intensive R&D before reaching the stage of construction of electricity production facilities.
Safe and reliable: with a search for progress compared to current reactors, and by eliminating as far as possible the need for evacuation of people outside the site, whatever the cause and severity of the accident inside the power plant
dedeleco wrote: And yet the feasible future, certain to heat itself for free in perpetuity without CO2, or nuclear and which works is that functional to www.dlsc.ca
thanks to the sun in summer kept for winter, which has been melting for us for over 4 billion years without polluting us !!
It only remains for me to do it at home with unpretentious solar collectors and also unpretentious underground drilling !!
.... [/ b]!
...
moinsdewatt wrote:
Revisit this thing all the time post made in Dedeleco it becomes annoying
[...] Good then, you studied that seriously? .
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"