Water management: pumping, drilling, filtration, well, recovery ...Brita filters

Management, access and use of water you: drilling, pumping, wells, distribution network, treatment, remediation, recovery of rainwater. Recovery processes, filtration, decontamination, storage. Service water pumps. Manage, use, and conserve water, desalination and desalination, pollution and water ...
Targol
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1897
Registration: 04/05/06, 16:49
Location: Bordeaux region

Unread Messageby Targol » 11/07/08, 00:55

fabio.gel wrote:Have you tested the PH of your water before and after your filtration system?

I would be interested in the outcome?

Thank you


Anyway Citro results do not invalidate your experience of acidification by osmosis as it uses it, an active carbon filter.
There are osmosis filtration system format "under the sink"?
Je pensais que c'était plus gros que ça :|
0 x
"He who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is mad or an economist." KEBoulding

User avatar
I Citro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5129
Registration: 08/03/06, 13:26
Location: Bordeaux
x 8

Unread Messageby I Citro » 11/07/08, 03:01

: Arrow: Yes there are small osmoseurs under sink.
like this one

Nothing to do with that I have .
0 x
little sparrow
Éconologue good!
Éconologue good!
posts: 214
Registration: 30/09/06, 21:23
Location: South West

Unread Messageby little sparrow » 11/07/08, 09:30

Bonjour,

Tap water (not filtered)
pH = 7.6 (ideal)
Chlorine = 1.6 (there)

Water of my fountain (filtered)
pH = 7.4 (barely perceptible difference, or assay reagent unequal?)
Chlorine = 1.3 (same remark as for pH)


hi Citro,
I do not know what the composition of your cartridge filtration .... but I hope it is not activated charcoal .. !! ??
because such a result on chlorine is absolutely not consistent with activated carbon, which rightly has very good efficacy about it .. !!

but this filter is presented in "double action" (sediment + chlorine) ..., very puzzled in the light of this result before / after .............


@ Justemilieu ....;

I have already spoken suffisemment ... I'm not going to repeat every time ...
I said, after all .. "all ideas" ... and everyone thinks what he wants .......
If you want more information, more precisely, just you seek information from experts on the issue .....
(Not the aquarium ..)


@ Fabio.gel;

careful not to generalize a particular case, especially when one does not know the type of the device, its exact composition, its quality and performance levels, its use ....
because "bad" devices ..., it exists ... (counterfeit, low-end Chinese device ..), but without denying the case presented here and its impacts ....., it is not reasonable to judging a type of device in general ....... !!
(It is already not normal to have a pH as low output of osmosis .. !!!, therefore, doubt is widely allowed on the operation or quality of this device ... but not to question all devices of this type! )

cordially
0 x
well hello to you !! ...
User avatar
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11

Unread Messageby jonule » 11/07/08, 09:48

Hello,
what should be a good PH then?
tu préconises quel autre appareil ? il rend un PH meilleur ?
does not the pH depend on the initial pH, or does the osmosis machine correct it automatically? how ,
merci
0 x
the middle
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4075
Registration: 12/01/07, 08:18
x 1

Unread Messageby the middle » 11/07/08, 10:21

(It is already not normal to have a pH as low output of osmosis .. !!!, therefore, doubt is widely allowed on the operation or quality of this device ...

: Idea: ho! Perhaps he installed a adouciseur salt before ....
0 x

Targol
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1897
Registration: 04/05/06, 16:49
Location: Bordeaux region

Unread Messageby Targol » 11/07/08, 10:46

jonule wrote:Hello,
what should be a good PH then?


A neutral pH is 7,5 if I remember correctly.
Le mieux est de s'en approcher au maximum.
0 x
"He who believes that exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is mad or an economist." KEBoulding
User avatar
jonule
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2404
Registration: 15/03/05, 12:11

Unread Messageby jonule » 11/07/08, 11:03

de 0 à 14 c'est pas 7 qui est neutre ?

good, if the water is re-mineralized via a tray with limestone "eg" (method of drinkable rainwater) is re-stabilized right?
0 x
discus62
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 8
Registration: 11/07/08, 11:13

Unread Messageby discus62 » 11/07/08, 11:30

Bonjour à tous, je suis un petit nouveau, ca fait un moment que je parcours ce forum et pour une fois je peux peut-être apporter quelque chose a une discussion.

-Le rendement de l'osmoseur est très mauvais puisque pour obtenir 1 litre d'eau osmosé il faut au minimum 4 litres d'eau, donc ca fait 3 litres qui partent dans les égouts.

-For Low PH is not so surprising since it's the water coming out of the membrane has a hardness that is carbonnatée zero, it was therefore no buffering and pH can vary énommément. And actually putting limestone rocks the PH should go quickly because the hardness will increase and stabilized the PH.

-For The difference between can have a reverse osmosis which is used in the aquarium and some domestic osmosis is that it can have a remineralization cartridge with the release of the membrane. If there is another difference I will like to know
0 x
User avatar
I Citro
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 5129
Registration: 08/03/06, 13:26
Location: Bordeaux
x 8

Unread Messageby I Citro » 11/07/08, 11:44

little sparrow wrote:Bonjour,

Tap water (not filtered)
pH = 7.6 (ideal)
Chlorine = 1.6 (there)

Water of my fountain (filtered)
pH = 7.4 (barely perceptible difference, or assay reagent unequal?)
Chlorine = 1.3 (same remark as for pH)


hi Citro,
I do not know what the composition of your cartridge filtration .... but I hope it is not activated charcoal .. !! ??
because such a result on chlorine is absolutely not consistent with activated carbon, which rightly has very good efficacy about it .. !!

but this filter is presented in "double action" (sediment + chlorine) ..., very puzzled in the light of this result before / after .............


Ma cartouche filtrante à beaucoup d'heures de vol... :|
Cela explique sûrement son manque d'efficacité sur le Chlore... :?
It seems that the media uses filtation "KDF" renowned.
I heard that activated charcoal could pose some problems ...

I have difficulties to stock up on replacement cartridges at the right price ... : Evil:
0 x
the middle
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 4075
Registration: 12/01/07, 08:18
x 1

Unread Messageby the middle » 11/07/08, 11:51

:D Hello Discus, and welcome
Bin oui,j'ai le meme avis que toi.
Good..pour les buveurs d'eauA good reminder:
It is advised by (I forget which), change from time to time water mark ..histoire de minéraux.
They are not the same from one region to another,
Et l'eauuuu ferrrrrugineuse oui; l'alcool non !
0 x


Back to "Water Management: pumping, drilling, filtration, well, recovery ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 1 guest