With the difference that Rossi (I still can't comment on the reality of his thing) succeeds!
JMMoreau has been groaning since at least 2006 and doesn't seem to be crowding!
Rossi is about American investors:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/01/24/pr ... echnology/ and, if we get drunk on info, it is rather discreet at the theoretical level and does not fill us with literature like JMM.
Difference: certainly, he did not comply with really convincing protocols, but summoned people and made it known.
Basically, how would I do?
1) Of course I would look at my measurement protocols twice so as not to look ridiculous. I would cross-check lab measurements / long-term measurements.
2) I would post demos on Youtube / Vimeo.
3) I would invite famous people (not fashionable singers, of course) to a demo, with their measuring devices, in the presence of a cameraman. I would suggest a protocol to them, but we would follow theirs if they do not agree with mine. Of course, you will need to have a few trappist bins and sandwiches
4) I would exploit N ° 3, via the press
Of course, the ideal is to entrust a device that works to a laboratory, but this is the crux of the problem: how to ensure that the device will not be dismantled or stolen?
The other knot is of course: who really has something that works well beyond measurement errors in their cellar?
the protocol problem is very important: what proves that JMM did not deceive the bailiff with the help of a hose well hidden in his old Mitsubishi? The test would have been more convincing over 2000 km. What proves that Rossi in his first demos (too short) did not hide a chemical reagent in his reactor? In which case a test over several hours would have convinced more.