GMOs good for health

[GuyGadebois]

Oxitec has received authorization from the environmental protection agency to release millions of genetically modified males (GMOs) every week.

GMO mosquitoes breed with their wild cousins

In Brazil, hundreds of thousands of transgenic mosquitoes, genetically modified so that their offspring do not develop, have been disseminated in the environment. A study published in Nature shows that these GMO mosquitoes have had fertile offspring with wild cousins. The researchers therefore show the ineffectiveness of the technology in the fight against dengue fever but also point to potential risks.
https://www.infogm.org/6859-moustiques- ... s-sauvages

Ps: These are not the same GMOs, but they are the same technology, made by the same company: Oxitec

So already, it does not work and in addition (it is in your article, translated):

Is it time to reassess the risk assessment?

However, it is difficult to assess how the EPA regulators have weighed and considered public comments and how much evidence used in the final risk determination has been provided only by technology developers.

We are concerned about the closed nature of this risk assessment process.

There is a potential bias and conflict of interest when experimental testing and ecological risk assessments lack political responsibility and are carried out by or in close collaboration with technology developers.

[GuyGadebois]

science-and-technology / gmo-mosquito-the-fiasco-playing-with-dna-it-is-not-easy-t16120.html? hilit = mosquitoes # p367231

[Exnihiloest]

...
https://www.infogm.org/6859-moustiques- ... s-sauvages
...

Militant site, article made by a graduate in philosophy, not even a journalist, no scientific reference.
If he were to prove to us that God exists, Gadget would refer us to the blog of a Jehovah's Witness.

Even if what this activist says is partially correct, no one claims to get the silver bullet the first time, except those without experience who have never done anything themselves.
The version of the modified mosquito discussed in link I indicated is the OX5034. GuyGadebois responds, always late for a war, on the OX513A, an old version of the GMO mosquito. He does not read what one writes, he answers wrongly, all he does is presence. Like all mustelids, it must mark its territory. Annoying.

[GuyGadebois]

Militant site, article made by a graduate in philosophy, not even a journalist, no scientific reference.

Ditto for your false info. No scientific reference, just a marketing press release questioned by the authors of the text to which your link refers.
Well, reliable sources there are at the end of the article:

GMO mosquito: technical failure but economic success for Oxitec!
Oxitec: originally, a company that was born in the corridors of the University of Oxford… A spin-off as they are called. It is now part of the Intrexon octopus. As for its flagship "product", transgenic mosquitoes developed as a vector control tool against dengue, it has been a smashing failure wherever it has been tested.

https://www.infogm.org/6935-moustique-o ... our-oxitec

Fail:
https://www.futura-sciences.com/planete ... ats-77698/
Fail:
In Brazil, the offspring of genetically modified mosquitoes are proving more resistant than expected and other scientific news.
https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/ ... embre-2019
Failure:
https://regardscroises.blog.tdg.ch/arch ... 06838.html

In fact, apart from Oxitec and Tryphion, everyone sees the failure of this "technology" ...

[Exnihiloest]

...
...
In fact, apart from Oxitec, everyone sees the failure of this "technology" ... Except Tryphion

Investors surely have money to lose ...

Only the future can tell. How long between Oersted's experience and the first operational electric motor?
Except that we are in the 21st century, developments are faster.

[GuyGadebois]

...
...
In fact, apart from Oxitec, everyone sees the failure of this "technology" ... Except Tryphion

Investors surely have money to lose ...

Do you play naive in addition? It is complete !

[Exnihiloest]

Militant site, article made by a graduate in philosophy, not even a journalist, no scientific reference.

Ditto for your false info. No scientific reference, just a marketing press release questioned by the authors of the text to which your link refers.
...

Not a press release. Article written by an academic, Brian F. Allan, https://sib.illinois.edu/profile/ballan , who has numerous publications behind him in ecology and biology.
Nothing to do with the clown licensed in philosophy who served as a reference.

And you don't even know how to tell the difference! Is it through incompetence or willfully to deceive us, because your posture is that of the primary anti-GMO?

[GuyGadebois]

Nothing to do with the clown licensed in philosophy who served as a reference.

The scientific references of the "clown" are at the bottom of the page. Did you say intellectually dishonest? Yes, it is Tryphion and his lies.
Indeed, Brian F. Allan questions the varacity of the announcements made by the lab and points to possible conflicts of interest ... You can't read or do you do it on purpose?

[Exnihiloest]

The scientific references of the "clown" are at the bottom of the page. Did you say intellectually dishonest? Yes, it is Tryphion and his lies.
Indeed, Brian F. Allan questions the varacity of the announcements made by the lab and points to possible conflicts of interest ... You can't read or do you do it on purpose?

So why did you lie ?!
You claim that the article is a press release from Oxitec, "without scientific reference", and then when the proof is made that you gave us anything because it is well written by a scientist with no connection to Oxitec, we explain that this guy is critical ?! But of course it is. I give information, I don't do Goebbels propaganda, me. Criticized or not, a new experiment will take place. Rome was not built in a day.
When will you stop your lies? It becomes grotesque.

[GuyGadebois]