Except very rare unexplained remissionsthe result will be the same, whether children or adults: death.
Still zero in analysis. No forgiveness is inexplicable, but some do not have the ability to analyze them since they are outside their area of expertise.
Moreover, people tired of allopathy, or simply abandoned by the official medicine to their plight, and having found their solution outside the system, do not shout on the roof since not listened by deaf. And they are by the thousands, by millions of the world, these healings unexplained by allopathic medicine.
As far as death is concerned, we are all mortal, so this reasoning is silly.
So if a doctor practices a therapy that improves the health of a highly ill individual, this is attributed to the practitioner's science and the effectiveness of the therapies implemented, but if it is practiced outside the system, it becomes the opposite It was only by chance that it had to happen thanks to the previously given therapies which have only a delayed effect, all the "resuscitated" of a medicine in failure have heard these phony reflections.
With your method, parents will be able to say to themselves, to give themselves a good conscience rather than to admit that science has limits: "we did everything for him", ie in fact, anything. These postures of illusion take the place of reason.
AT)! It is not MY method since it is only a testimony collected and ignorant of what has been practiced
B) is to take, in this example, the parents and the doctors for ignorant ones having noted the facts from either side
, twice in a row, so no chance in question.
C) Parents could only see the difference between two medical applications. The official in check, the unofficial bringing a net improvement.
D) the "we did everything for him ",
in this case for her, came from the medical services themselves
, since returning the child to his parents to die there, for not being able to cure it, as for the 150.000 other victims of the cancers [*]
E) Not being able to verify to the end, if this improvement could have gone to the final cure since official medicine got the better of the child's life
. So between two "illusions" as much choose the most efficient and the most humane.
[*] This is a small tip, hypocritical, so as not to count a death in the hospital whose reasons must be specified on the death notice, but at home (unless the doctor is honest) the mention on the cause will be " stopped breathing
", by failure of medicine to treat a leukemia, so not counted.And does not come to tell me the opposite since it happened in my family
. and it's common to distort statistics.
This person enters the Parisian hospital specialized in cancer and leukemia, a young doctor lays a catheter and magnifying glass and the chemo liquid spreads in the lung. The pulmonologist assures the family that he is in control of the situation and the oncologist says the same, even though he has been placed in a sterile isolation room. Of course he dies and the death certificate mentions, in medical terms that families never understand: death of having stopped breathing!
No mention of the skid, the lack of medical knowledge of the situation, just Stopped breathing
since he had not had time to finally die of this leukemia, even though he was there for it.
Maybe if he had gone to see a "charlatan" who was really healing, he would still be alive!
"We do science with facts, as is a house with stones, but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" Exnihiloest