Blow against bio-dynamics

[Moindreffor]

... in both cases it is the same will that motivates, to get out of dependence on oil

Yeah! Are you sure it comes down to this?

no of course, this is the main argument put forward, the tree that hides the forest ... you always need one

[Moindreffor]

we are destructive when we raze the Amazon rainforest to cultivate sugar cane to make biofuel

whereas in the end, in both cases it is the same will which motivates, is extracted from the dependence on oil, is there in these two examples a better solution, are they both good or bad ... it will depend on each person's convictions when science should be left to decide

Replacing an extraordinary biodiversity * with sugar cane to drive cars is just a monstrosity. Science has nothing to do with it ... and I don't see what it could "decide" on top of that.

* Thanks to which we can find future remedies, let's not forget: 70 to 80% of pharmaceutical molecules come from this biodiversity of which WE are also a part.

that's exactly what I wanted to show, destroying the Amazon makes you cry in the cottages, because it's the Amazon, the green lung of the planet , on the other hand the exploitation of rare earths nobody cares

science allows us to decide in a non-partisan way, without involving humans, nothing more, we take stock and compare ...

[Janic]

lesser reflection

the Amazon, the green lung of the planet, on the other hand the exploitation of rare earths nobody cares

ah, funny, always the word for laughs! The biggest lung on earth is the sea, polluted by YOUR chemicals that destroy oxygen production.

science allows us to decide in a non-partisan way, without involving humans, nothing more, we take stock and compare ...

do not confuse YOUR science, that which you defend and favor arbitrarily, and THE science which is not the property of anyone.
When in the balance sheet; a balance sheet when the disaster takes place is big, or worse when it is over to say " we didn't know it would be so badThis is the case with current experimental vaccines balanced in nature without any hindsight and without knowing what its impact will be in the future, as with all health scandals, your science does not weigh heavily! So let THE science, The real one, do its work without intervening in its processes which are too complex for us to understand anything.
At least, in biodynamics, the impact is minimalist.

[Ahmed]

Moindreffor, you write:

science allows us to decide in a non-partisan way ...

No, science only says what is possible at a given moment and it does not have the capacity to decree the most judicious choices with regard to criteria which are foreign to it. It is true that the possible is often found ipso facto transformed into the desirable, in the confusion which is that of science and economics ...

[Rajqawee]

Moindreffor, you write:

science allows us to decide in a non-partisan way ...

No, science only says what is possible at a given moment and it does not have the capacity to decree the most judicious choices with regard to criteria which are foreign to it. It is true that the possible is often found ipso facto transformed into the desirable, in the confusion which is that of science and economics ...

I don't know if I understood you or not, so I react or complete?

Science, one could define it as the sum of accumulated knowledge which made it possible to produce the best descriptive and predictive model of reality (which frankly, sends a max said like that!).

That said, it is neither perfect nor exhaustive (and never will be), and indeed will never answer certain questions, at least not alone.

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

on the other hand, the exploitation of rare earths nobody cares

But of course...
electric-transport / lithium-enough-resources-for-all-electric-vehicles-t15492-40.html? # p368646

[Moindreffor]

Moindreffor, you write:

science allows us to decide in a non-partisan way ...

No, science only says what is possible at a given moment and it does not have the capacity to decree the most judicious choices with regard to criteria which are foreign to it. It is true that the possible is often found ipso facto transformed into the desirable, in the confusion which is that of science and economics ...

when we do a balance sheet, for example carbon emission, science says such model such emission value such another another value
you have with science 2 values, and therefore necessarily one greater than the other, we can brutally compare the figures
after Amazon or asshole of the world that nobody cares it's what I call the Human

right now we want batteries for electric cars too bad for the asshole of the world, and we don't want sugarcane biofuel to keep the Amazon

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

You say absolutely anything ... it's terrifying.

[Moindreffor]

on the other hand, the exploitation of rare earths nobody cares

But of course...
electric-transport / lithium-enough-resources-for-all-electric-vehicles-t15492-40.html? # p368646

of course there are articles which denounce and fortunately, but do they measure up to those which denounce other scandals?
do you see youth demonstrations for Bolivia, as you can see for deforestation?
our young people want electric cars

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

on the other hand, the exploitation of rare earths nobody cares

But of course...
electric-transport / lithium-enough-resources-for-all-electric-vehicles-t15492-40.html? # p368646

of course there are articles which denounce and fortunately, but do they measure up to those which denounce other scandals?
do you see youth demonstrations for Bolivia, as you can see for deforestation?
our young people want electric cars

Ah because you know what's going on in Chile and Bolivia, you ??? Because it's not happening on our channels, nothing is happening ???