izentrop wrote:Spitting Claude Bourguignon ...
It's not just anyone.
izentrop wrote:Spitting Claude Bourguignon ...
Biobombe wrote:izentrop wrote:Spitting Claude Bourguignon ...
It's not just anyone.
Someone who with his cookie-cutter formulas has stigmatized agriculture to the public ....Biobombe wrote:It's not just anyone.izentrop wrote:Spitting Claude Bourguignon ...
hence anthroposophy, but at the same time they are its biggest clients.GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:it supports biodynamics
I had read one of his gardening books. What can be done in gardening: teens loaded with compost and organic matter is not applicable in field crops. In any case, not with the prices of globalization.Biobombe wrote:Jean-Marie Lespinasse, former INRA researcher well known there, and also recognized vegetable gardener, has invested a lot in order to improve the situation.
EvolvedGuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote: biodynamics has constantly evolved, has been successfully practiced, has been standardized by very strict specifications
Especially when we practice rates of this type https://www.sodivin.fr/romanee-conti-do ... 1961.html#Small quantities (100g / ha for horn dung and 4g / ha for silica) are diluted in water (30 to 50 liters per hectare) and stirred intensely (energized) for one hour. https://www.demeter.fr/professionnels/techniques/
coming from a guy who does not evolve, it is laughable!GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:
biodynamics has constantly evolved, has been successfully practiced, has been standardized by very strict specifications
Evolved
it is like all businesses, since "conventional" farmers demand more in synthetic chemical phytosanitary products (sic). It is the hospital which laught at the charityBut OK ! As long as the client asks for more, we can sacrifice a little of our time to ritual practices from another age.
in this area, given the price of bottles in agrochemicals too, it is ridiculous! In any case that underlines, for the drinkers, the quality obtained in biodynamicsEspecially when we practice rates of this type https://www.s odivin.fr/romanee-conti-do ... 1961.html # 0 x
GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:The idiot of the village takes as an example a mythical vintage (1961), from an equally mythical bottle (La Tâche), from a prestigious, internationally recognized estate (Romanée Conti), marketed by a retailer, to illustrate his stupidity. . How beautiful is her life as a fool?
Tiens crétin incredible (not biodynamic nor organic): Petrus 1961 € 13.320,00 https://www.drinksco.fr/vin-pomerol/petrus-1961-ov
The Task is given, in comparison! Fool...
1%, we're not going to make cheese out of itEstablished for decades, this practice inherited from anthroposophical philosophy is mainly used in viticulture. If it is marginal (it would represent around 1% of cultivated vines in the world, against 9% for organic and 90% for conventional), it is prized by some consumers, and claimed by some of the most prestigious estates ( Pommard, la Romanée-Conti). https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/201 ... e_1748023/
Established for decades, this practice inherited from anthroposophical philosophy is mainly used in viticulture. If it is marginal (it would represent around 1% of cultivated vines in the world, against 9% for organic and 90% for conventional), it is prized by some consumers, and claimed by some of the most prestigious estates ( Pommard, la Romanée-Conti). https://www.liberation.fr/checknews/201 ... e_1748023 /
the andouille of service (abcon will make the mouth if you steal his throne to him who says the most bullshit) adds some. In general, the more demanding, the fewer candidates there are! This is why the conventional is the most important, there is no requirement for true quality (no residue).1%, we're not going to make cheese out of it
Back to "Agriculture: problems and pollution, new techniques and solutions"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 185 guests