janic wrote: This is the utopia to believe that the same causes will not produce the same effects
It is foolishness to believe that the same effects will necessarily have the same causes.
If you step on a nail that will hurt the foot, it is and it remains
ce nail which is the cause and no other injury can replace the cause. Don't reverse it.
In other words, a sustainable system can very well provide a level of comfort comparable to today without the cohort of negative effects inherent in the current system.
So you found the grail!
Particularly linked to debt money and capitalism.
Bof!
It is just in bad faith to say that comfort and conscience have not progressed over the centuries.
I did not say that. It's just your point of view. What I say, like others, that you cannot have your cake and eat it at the same time and this comfort has had a human and ecological cost, the effects of which are being felt today. However, consciousness (but what kind?) Could not, most of the time, estimate the consequences of certain choices. Asbestos being an example.
janic wrote: it is not us, the little jokes, who will do it better.
A little fun, that's for sure.
2 little jokes, that's for sure.
Isn't there a quantitative threshold of little jokes where the conclusion is reversed?
Absolutely not ! It would work if it was AI that would decide it, without emotion, but I doubt that it would please, nor be sure that it would really work since determined by men.
On the other hand, what is certain is that with such a preconceived idea as yours, such a defeatism "before fighting", and I would put Sen no sen and ABC2019 in the lot too, nothing is in danger of change for the better.
Defeatism is playing the game of the current system.
We must not confuse, once again, the goodwill wanting to change the world and the possibility that it changes willingly, it is even the opposite. As you can read, I am VGL, would the world change in this direction? NO unless constrained! I am against tobacco, alcohol, even legal drugs, the bidoche and for freedom of conscience in health matters including vaccines. None of these aspects will meet a transforming unanimity and it is not defeatism but realism. So I play the hummingbird with
MONTH drops of water and come what may!
janic wrote: It's all well and good (and a natural reflex) to believe in a better future, ... and it is this hope (even utopian) which continues to give hope like the one who falls from the 20th floor and who until RdeC says to himself "so far I'm still alive and I've had the hardest part, so everything is fine!"
Because you are in a logic of dominated, resigned, in relation to the subject.
look up to see.
Who do you think you are? You confuse dominated (we all are!) And resigned with fatalism. It was not me who would turn the earth in reverse and so I made up my mind.
"We make science with facts, like making a house with stones: but an accumulation of facts is no more a science than a pile of stones is a house" Henri Poincaré