Pandemic Coronavirus COVID-19: maps, statistics, analyzes and day-to-day information

[izentrop]

ya stronger than a nobel prize, ya the big zyzy

papanoours.jpg

Y says what he wants the gateux.
Montagné also had the Nobel Prize, but that didn't stop him from saying a lot of bullshit about Sars cov 2 and the "memory of water".

[ABC2019]

why can't that explain everything?

You have only a few hours left to prove to Ouaoua that you're a scientist, so instead of asking silly questions....

it's a real question, why wouldn't that explain the difference (besides the fact that we don't have to test everyone in Haiti)?

(and who is it wow?)

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(and who is it wow?)

The nice boy (a little naive) who kindly asked you to bring the kind proof that you are a real scientist within 72 hours.
health-pollution-prevention / the-coronavirus-cons-t16359-6460.html # p503533

[ABC2019]

(and who is it wow?)

The nice boy (a little naive) who kindly asked you to bring the kind proof that you are a real scientist within 72 hours.
health-pollution-prevention / the-coronavirus-cons-t16359-6460.html # p503533

oh yes I only read 10% of his posts, randomly... well he will have to tell me what he considers to be proof then!

we can discuss the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator and its quantum solutions for example, would that suit you wow?

[Janic]

10/07/22, 23:01
ABCile wrote:

oh yes I only read 10% of his posts, randomly... well he will have to tell me what he considers to be proof then!

Oooooh the big liar! You read them all and you pretend not to have read them so as not to answer them, except when it suits you to post your shit.

we can discuss the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator and its quantum solutions for example, would that suit you wow?

you can be "scientific" competent in ONE area and completely hollow and stupid in others, such as your incompetent opinions on H, naturopathy, vaccination, etc...

[reinoso]

one wonders why zyzy did not relay the delicious words of the great clairvoyant JF DELFRAISSY?

delfraissy.jpg (53.56 KiB) Viewed 882 times

delfraissy2.jpg (57.56 KiB) Viewed 882 times

his crystal ball starts to fail

delfraissy3.jpg (49.17 KiB) Viewed 882 times

but she still has a lot of resources!

delfraissy4.jpg (26.74 KiB) Viewed 882 times

he also added that the only effective drug against covid is paxlovid (which we don't trust enough)

definitely his crystal ball is at the top

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

(Translated)

Bad news for Paxlovid? Coronavirus can find multiple ways to evade COVID-19 drug
Laboratory studies identify resistance mutations in SARS-CoV-2 protease, and some circulating variants have them

Prescriptions for Pfizer's flagship drug, Paxlovid, have skyrocketed in recent weeks. This is good news for many COVID-19 patients, as the pill has been proven to reduce serious illness from SARS-CoV-2 infections. But a slew of new lab studies show the coronavirus can mutate in ways that make it less susceptible to the drug, by far the most widely used of the two oral antiviral drugs licensed to treat COVID-19 in the United States. The researchers found some of these mutations in variants already circulating in infected people, raising new concerns that doctors could soon lose one of their best therapies for fighting COVID-19.

Taken together, the studies show that "when you put pressure on the virus, it escapes," says David Ho, a virologist at Columbia University who was among the first to document drug resistance mutations in the virus. HIV about 3 decades ago. Ho was not involved in the new studies but is conducting similar work on SARS-CoV-2. Although the newly identified mutations have not yet become widespread, Ho and many other scientists believe it is only a matter of time. "Given the amount of infections there, it's going to come," Ho says.

The resistance studies follow other recent concerns about Paxlovid, which in the United States remains limited to use in people with risk factors that make them more likely to develop severe COVID-19. Confirming anecdotal reports widely reported in the media, several studies have found that a small percentage of infected people who receive the standard 5-day treatment initially feel better, only to see their symptoms rebound. And questions have arisen about whether Paxlovid helps those who aren't at high risk for severe disease -- Pfizer halted a large trial of the drug in patients at standard risk for COVID-19 earlier this month because it did not show statistically significant protection against death or hospitalization.

Suite: https://www-science-org.translate.goog/ ... x_tr_hl=fr

[Janic]

izMentrop, way too many!
10/07/22, 21:28

Montagné also had the Nobel Prize, but that didn't stop him from saying a lot of bullshit about Sars cov 2 and the "memory of water".

in that case, he said a lot, a lot, less than you. On the other hand, it would be interesting if you, the ignoramus in medicine, explained to us what bullshit was said about the memory of water (without copying and pasting all the bullshit of your sect of pseudo zetetic.)
Otherwise you can go back much further with Pasteur, who did not have a medical degree, and his "scientific scam on vaccination!

[Obamot]

(Translated)

Instead of a copy/paste, I could have sworn that you were going to explain to us why?

AH DAMN ! (even translated...)

[izentrop]