Outstanding intellectuals

[GuyGadebois]

it is normal that you do not understand well, by dint of swallowing granules with polecal juice diluted 200 times ....

Apart from granules of arnica (which in my case and that of my son were a great success), I do not use H. Try again.

like good idea, I'm going to seek scientific references on the action of arnica. You know that I don't take anything, and that it goes anyway?

Thanks Superman. Nothing to give a damn about scientific references when it comes to arnica. Don't waste your time.

[ABC2019]

Apart from granules of arnica (which in my case and that of my son were a great success), I do not use H. Try again.

like good idea, I'm going to seek scientific references on the action of arnica. You know that I don't take anything, and that it goes anyway?

Thanks Superman. Nothing to give a damn about scientific references when it comes to arnica.

we understood, whether arnica or black-footed ass . But it was for my personal curiosity that I said that, not for you.

[GuyGadebois]

But it was for my personal curiosity that I said that, not for you.

If you could keep your illusions to yourself, that would be nice.

[eclectron]

[
personally, I will never adhere to a discourse which seeks to convince that an irrational way of thinking is preferable to a rational way of thinking.

Utopia has changed sides and current events are only the premises ...

[izentrop]

- adhere to anthropogenic warming and to the idea that CO2 is a pollutant
CO2 is GHG, global warming is proven.
Consequently the CO2 (the dose making the poison) by its impact on the climate becomes a pollutant. But CO2 is not a pollutant in absolute terms since it is on the contrary necessary for plants, it is just the dose that makes "the poison".

Exactly, we can clearly see the contradictions of someone who assesses it well for a phyto product and unable to see it concerning CO2, pure ideology

- adhere to the idea that GMOs are of no interest for the public good.
The problem with GMOs is that they are created in the spirit of current biocide agriculture, known as traditional and moreover we play sorcerer's apprentices with these GMOs in the wild.
GMOs there is simply no need for them to eat, period.

It is your ideology that comes into play, because since man has been farming he has been selecting. It is just more efficient today and believe me, we will need it to adapt production to climate change.

If you want examples, look for Roundup resistant wild mustard yes gene transfer ...

This kind of resistance is due to improper use, it's like antibiotic resistance and it reverses quite easily.

[eclectron]

it's like antibiotic resistance and it reverses quite easily.

[eclectron]

It is your ideology that comes into play, because since man has been farming he has been selecting. It is just more efficient today and believe me, we will need it to adapt production to climate change.

It's true but it has nothing to do with GMOs.
Do not believe that introducing an insecticide against the European corn borer into the genome is absolutely harmless ... even if it is written on the label and validated by laboratory tests ... by the seller himself.

Not even said that such a corn, if it had been produced by nature itself, would have been considered edible ...

Must stop with this ideology of violating nature!
Composing with what it offers us of itself and therefore the selection of which you speak above, is a system which has proven itself.
-------------
Even natural hybridization to cause problems but GMOs not !?

https://www.lepoint.fr/societe/hallowee ... 11_23.php#

But squash from the family vegetable garden can also become unfit for consumption following savage hybridization. A phenomenon that occurs when bitter varieties, decorative for Halloween or "wild", and edible varieties coexist in the same vegetable garden or in the vicinity and the seeds are harvested from year to year.

[izentrop]

Do not believe that introducing an insecticide against the European corn borer into the genome is absolutely harmless ...

You prefer to poison the rest of the biodiversity. Go do an internship at an agri, they are in lack of MO. ;)

Mutations have always existed, even between species. In the battle of life, the plant with the best defenses survives. We too have billions of bacteria that help us survive. Besides, evolved beings are made up of microorganisms originally independent which have specialized over the course of evolution to form elements of organisms that are always more efficient at survival. Most wild plants use part of their energy to produce defense toxins. https://www.larecherche.fr/et-si-les-vi ... -sur-terre

[Janic]

Besides, evolved beings are made up of microorganisms originally independent which have specialized over the course of evolution to form elements of organisms that are always more efficient at survival.

ouarf, ouarf, you believe anything! Even the masons do not believe that the concrete blocks are assembled on their own to form much more efficient walls than a pile of bricks in a pile.

[eclectron]

...

I just showed you that natural hybridization can make it unfit for consumption, for example.
Feel free to think that a GMO is absolutely harmless to the health of the person who consumes it and that it is beneficial for nature since the insecticide is in the plant and no longer on it!

but the worst part is that GMOs have no justification, we can do without *.
It's just a story of cash and a violent and conquering mentality that justifies GMOs.

So suck your green Baygon quietly, I eat my Bio!

* what did this story of golden rice give?
We do "1000 times" better with classic white rice and spirulina on the same surfaces ....
You just have to dig a little deeper and there are always natural solutions, so please stop making yourself a defender of the agrochemicals business. It's from the past.