Bistro for off-topic conversations
published: 16/03/21, 12:30
Anyone who has grievances with others forumers, who have nothing to do with the current topics should do them here, eh!
Follow my eyes
Follow my eyes
Company solutions for ecology and economy. Politics, technologies, innovations, clean energy, home and work, DIY and self-construction, repairing a breakdown, health, bitcoins and alternative finance
https://www.econologie.com/forums/
https://www.econologie.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=16793
izentrop wrote:Anyone who has grievances with others forumers, who have nothing to do with the current topics should do them here, eh!
Follow my eyes
Obamot wrote:And me, you will excuse me for asking questions that go beyond yours on the whole. The application of your theoretical slingshot is already shattered with that https://www.bluewin.ch/fr/infos/faits-d ... 63981.html [not answered] And if we examine in detail, how can you put forward such a figure “even at minority incidence”, While it is proven that ALL the“ forecasts ”were bogus, so you have no basis - while Pfizer announced an efficiency of 95% - which is even very insufficient since it does not do much better than the immunity of the population “in general” (a result that would be achieved without any vaccine at all). Worse still, the vaccine would be a serious brake on a return to normalcy:ABC2019 wrote:Obamot wrote:
But where can you get these numbers from ?
out of nowhere, these are not real figures, it was just to show that it could very well be that vaccination was in the minority in the reduction of mortality, and yet it was essential for eradication disease, on a theoretical example.
Sorry to use reasoning that is beyond your intellectual capacities, I get tricked every time ...- "We make you make antibodies by vaccines which instead of neutralizing your virus, will help it to enter the cells, sometimes even to replicate itself ..."
https://planetes360.fr/alexandra-henrio ... repliquer/
And while it would take a result> 99%, our great scientist argues with 10% as if it were possibly significant data in his demonstration ... NOT AT ALL: even partial, your figure is useless!
Sorry if my intellectual capacities exceeded, allow me to pierce yours with such a large magnification
Pretends not to understand, fails to answer the essential points ... that's it ... continue your rotting in order, but IT'S DEAD ... For a year your words have been blown => health-pollution-prevention / covid-19-list-of-effective-vaccines-t16510-2010.html # p441613 )ABC2019 wrote: the vaccine is not intended to do better than natural immunity,
Janic wrote:abc pedro.the vaccine is not intended to do better than natural immunity, it is intended to immunize without causing death. (and my "fromde", I guess my formula, is not intended to be applied numerically to a real case, it was just an example to show that it could be possible, but ok I shouldn't have used this mode of reasoning that is inaccessible to you)
Precisely, your stupid reasoning is inaccessible to normal people; So your gibberish at the playground; is only meant to satisfy your narcissistic ego.
You are so bad that you take for granted an American graph not sourced, but not the European statistics not sourced either, (for the moment) but which correspond perfectly, in not truncated to the grah of infovac, "official" site of fakenews, truncated it! You got a hell of a lot of c… nneries!if this were true, then we should observe an increase in cases among vaccinated compared to the rest of the population, is that your prediction?
Still wanting to stick your fantasies to others. If 95%, and even more, have a sufficient immune system, the vaccines don't make you sicker than a bug bite, a little inflammation and it goes. On the other hand the most fragile, them, do not pass through and break their pipeIt is sure that you are much more qualified than she, everyone noticed it mister the super specialist in everything… what you do not know!This Madame Henrion-Caude seems to me to have all the signs of a paranoid psychosis with delirious flashes, but hey she has her audience of fans, those who suffer from the same illness.You mean you stop your bullshit? Phew, finally!But frankly if all these people do not want to be vaccinated, I have absolutely nothing against. It gives us a little chance to stop having to read his bullshit.
ABC2019 wrote:Janic wrote:Now a little look at the scarecrow that represents in the collective unconscious, the fear of tetanus
In WHO World Health Statistics Yearbook, we can compare England and France from 1963 to 1972
In 1963 the A had 25.903 vaccinated and 13 died of tetanus, while France had 519.494 vaccinated and 293 dead.
In 1965 the A 351.328 vaccinated and 21 dead; France 682.000 vaccinated and 258 dead
In 1967 the A 849.339 vaccinated or 2.5 times more and ...18 dead for a population of about 55 million h;
France 965.738 vaccinated and 234 dead for 49 million H.
We realize, for the A that with 2.5 times more vaccinated there are only 3 deaths of difference, and therefore that the vaccine has nothing to do with it.
Since other factors come into play, you can't infer anything at all. But until you get that point it will be a conversation at cross purposes.
Haven't you finished rotting the PB2487 / 88 / PDV wires?Obamot wrote:pedrodelavega wrote:Janic wrote: like that reminds Casasnovas, harassed by the extractor and justice found him wrong,
Did justice give him wrong?
In any case in his last video .... :
The "top" at 17m30.
Don't you feel completely alone? ? these videos are worth nothing, you're wasting your time frankly.
Obamot wrote:Haven't you finished rotting the PB2487 / 88 / PDV wires?Obamot wrote:pedrodelavega wrote:Did justice give him wrong?
In any case in his last video .... :
The "top" at 17m30.
Don't you feel completely alone? ? these videos are worth nothing, you're wasting your time frankly.
Here I have a present for you. Not far from the stupid videos that you currently post ... You will like it I'm sure!
https://odysee.com/@Lav%C3%A9rit%C3%A9p ... -Taygeta:b
Macro wrote:the study presented is on children under 5 years old .... So either children vaccinated to go to creche for 2 to 3 years or unvaccinated children who will have remained in a "restricted" environment during the same period. So not at all the same environments ...
In any case .... We just went to 57% for vaccination ...
Here is another study with obvious biases.ABC2019 wrote:hydroxy blah-blah-blah https://www.nature.com/articles/bla-bla-bla
I was thinking of respecting the theme of the subject. The subject was not virology, unless it was some kind of "humor"ABC2019 wrote:izentrop wrote:You contribute a lot too ... permanent HS and maybe also in quantum mechanics, the solution is not always the most logical.
there is no HS in the video, that was not the point that made me think about it ... just the spectacle of a collection of people denying the obvious and chasing the one who is the only one in theirs recall, with all the possible bogus arguments, the false moralizing judgments, the attempts at exclusion ... the usual human stupidity what