Forhorse wrote:Again you are wasting your time:
- He does not answer the questions asked.
- It does not bother to study the proposed solutions (I have provided a turnkey)
- Anyway, he will have the project done by students, his only job will be to convince an educational team and in the end he will congratulate himself on the result when he has done nothing.
Well definitely, it's not going to you right now!
Your comments are more like the whims of a little boy who absolutely wants us to do what he offers without listening to others.
Okay, I think we can close this subject which goes into conflict and aggression.
I am really wondering about the reasons for these fierce comments which add nothing except aggressiveness and conflict.
Is it to avoid talking about certain subjects, is it simply antipathy, or to plant econology? As soon as the system works, I will make a video,
but no one will be forced to watch it, especially if it is to then send their hatred or anger.
Well, I have a job, no offense to Forhorse, today we are working, as a team, to improve a detail of the mechanical part of the system.
For the IoT, we'll see later ... with students ... or not!
NB: a big thank you to those who proposed products and solutions. We ordered some interesting and economical materials to see how they work and if they bring benefits to this project or to others.
Ps: just one last note in passing ... Curiously, with Forhorse we have a common passion, that of horses. I remember that we talked about this several years ago ...
It is singular to note that since the dawn of time, the actors of the equestrian environment have always put themselves in a situation of conflict ...
Even the greatest squires, Baucher, d'Aure, L'Hotte, who had nothing to prove and laid the foundations for horse riding today as their equestrian knowledge was immense, opposed in fratricidal struggles that are still not explained today. A bit like here in this vast subject of the Internet of Things, with a small example of an application from the equestrian sector (which I probably should not have given).
That's how it is, although it is said that "The exterior of the horse is good for the interior of man" ... but not always.