Fusion, unlimited energy, return of the 30 glorious without GHGs

[humus]

[Christophe]

Already made in China, see subject ITER / FUSION ... and not in a university lab in partnership with a $ tart up!

Magnetic confinement has been working on it for 50 years!

No technology info: how many (milli) seconds did the controlled fusion last?

Very high temperatures to make a plasma ??? False: any flame is a plasma ... candle, lighter ...

Blah ...

Are these the same people who promoted pfizer?

[humus]

Are these the same people who promoted pfizer?

No, rowdy announcements followed by nothing, it's a job
inventions-innovations / energie-de-nikola-tesla-christophe-tetard-t16562.html
Sorry, I'm starting

[Christophe]

ITER has just bought a huge magnet ... made in the USA .... several hundred tons per bouzin ..

MIT with its 10-scale minute pressure cookers, I can't believe it for a second.

I could be wrong so please where are the posts?

[humus]

Not what we call a publication but it is already that

To give an idea: a traditional copper magnet requires around 200 million Watts to confine the plasma, while the one developed by MIT requires only 30 Watts.

https://siecledigital.fr/2021/09/14/fus ... consommee/


or even
https://www.futura-sciences.com/science ... tee-59320/

[Ahmed]

"The fusion revolution: a breakthrough for the planet"... Unintentional humor?

[humus]

"The fusion revolution: a breakthrough for the planet"... Unintentional humor?

Yes, it happens a bit early compared to the ever growing and still dominant capitalism.
If it continues in this way, the cocktail may be explosive!

[Ahmed]

A "croissantist" capitalism is a pleonasm and a stable capitalism is a doldrums!
As for the rest, I have confidence: their central "fusion" is not ready to function, moreover the fusion is in strong regression in our society confit in Zemmourie ...

[humus]

A "croissantist" capitalism is a pleonasm and a stable capitalism is a doldrums!

Yes but sometimes you have to insist where it hurts
The word capitalism is still far too neutral in general perception.

[Ahmed]

This is not a reproach that I addressed to you, but a simple wink. To insist in this way is a rhetorical figure of speech and not a mistake.