Not on the end that is better than 2016 2015;
Introducing a genetic modification can now be done in a week, compared to several months previously, and at a ridiculous cost
http://www.lesechos.fr/idees-debats/sci ... 188803.php
Introducing a genetic modification can now be done in a week, compared to several months previously, and at a ridiculous cost
clear all that does not stick to TON speech on the subject is creationist?Janic thank you not to pollute the subject with your innuendo creationist.
Only as part of your evolutionism! But I have not mentioned any creationism but I just pointed out the points on evolutionism that do not say ... but assume! It still has the right not?As has been said and repeat, in the evolutionary adaptation framework is an evolution on a small scale.
it is faith to faith, belief to belief, assumption assumption.And scale it up to the appearance of new species, not bothering your faith ...
Janic wrote: clear all that does not stick to TON speech on the subject is creationist?
Only as part of your evolutionism! But I have not mentioned any creationism but I just pointed out the points on evolutionism that do not say ... but assume! It still has the right not?
When the scale in question is still only a theory, not a certainty!
Janic wrote:
clear all that does not stick to TON speech on the subject is creationist?
All your remarks on the subject comes systematically with the questioning of the facts in order to subtly introduce ideas consistent with creationism, should stop taking them for other hams!
ca part of the game! You did the same: no? When one thing is sure and certain it can not be called into question, but heard on may be the way you do me when I have something to say, I do not need sub heard.Your remarks are not free, they logical, you call into question, you stressed assumptions, you noted doubts, innuendo ...Quote:
Only as part of your evolutionism! But I have not mentioned any creationism but I just pointed out the points on evolutionism that do not say ... but assume! It still has the right not?
Just check the subject on the evolution and one that would not see them is the victim of blindness.At least have the courage to admit your position clearly and unequivocally ...
A false theory is not worth more in the sense of unverifiable too.One theory is worth a thousand unverifiable beliefs ...Quote:
When the scale in question is still only a theory, not a certainty!
Janic wrote: virologists have issued the ASSUMPTION viruses would in fact the real drivers of evolution. .
But this premise to serious consequencesIt means both that Darwin's theory, even in its modern version, is false and secondly that the virus would not be all that dangerous and some we would even be beneficial
http://www.astrosurf.com/luxorion/bio-r ... lution.htm
To this we may add that the same confusion continues to exist between adaptation (a term used by the author) and evolution (as used elsewhere).
I have not written but city !!!!!Janic wrote:
virologists have suggested that the virus would ASSUMPTION fact the real motors of evolution. .
But this premise to heavy consequences, in part, means that the theory of Darwin, even in its modern version, is false and secondly that viruses are not all dangerous, and some we would even be beneficial
It is to me!Janic wrote:
To this we may add that the same confusion continues to exist between adaptation (a term used by the author) and evolution (as used elsewhere).
This is not a hypothesis, it is a scientific reality, we are trained to 8% old retrovirus, proven and condemned, just like find the most varied and concordant evidence, footprints, DNA, fingerprints digital, etc ,, proving coupabilité a thief or a criminal who make the trap!
Would I have touched a chord? Sen no sen has just made another friend!Finally, Darwin showed and proved that the struggle for life in all its forms is a living motor of evolution fundamental, simply because the more fortunate and more alone suitable survive better over thousands or millions of generations (even a very small advantage least% cumulative becomes predominant in 100% of these generations) !!
So Janic is requested to stop polluting repeating ad nauseam the same old false claims of religious beliefs, which have conditioned to deny the reality of scientific facts of evolution of life, obsessed hundreds of pages, with quibbles to distinguish adaptive evolution, which have no meaning because the chance is huge in evolution
Back to "Science and Technology"
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 151 guests