I could have put another title:
Will they do it?
Let a virus like cholera develop, or another more devastating one.
For a few years, we have been warned: beware, a new virus can appear at any time and kill a lot of people ..
A vaccine will be developed, but will be first served doctors, politicians, engineers ... (ARTE)
The others after ...
This is the simple solution to the pollution of the planet.
In this case, the rich will be "saved" ... the planet too ... maybe
That's it, I started a topic with the con, but .... may be well programmed by the rulers.
Crowded planet Earth?
-
- Econologue expert
- posts: 4075
- Registration: 12/01/07, 08:18
- x 4
- highfly-addict
- Grand Econologue
- posts: 757
- Registration: 05/03/08, 12:07
- Location: Pyrenees, 43 years
- x 7
There are too many, okay.
But to think of a plot that would project to eliminate a significant fraction of the population through a virus, it seems big anyway!
Too many risks of losing loved ones .....
But to think of a plot that would project to eliminate a significant fraction of the population through a virus, it seems big anyway!
Too many risks of losing loved ones .....
0 x
"God laughs at those who deplore the effects of which they cherish the causes" BOSSUET
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
"We see what we believes"Dennis MEADOWS
- Gregconstruct
- Econologue expert
- posts: 1781
- Registration: 07/11/07, 19:55
- Location: Amay Belgium
Do not watch too much movies like Army 12 monkeys, I'm a Legend, 28 days later ...
Epidemics and viruses do not need humans to appear.
In case of overpopulation, the mechanism of natural selection is inevitably started.
This is true for the whole animal kingdom (including us) and also for the vegetable kingdom.
Epidemics and viruses do not need humans to appear.
In case of overpopulation, the mechanism of natural selection is inevitably started.
This is true for the whole animal kingdom (including us) and also for the vegetable kingdom.
0 x
Every action counts for our planet !!!
- Former Oceano
- Moderator
- posts: 1571
- Registration: 04/06/05, 23:10
- Location: Lorraine - France
- x 1
It seems to me, old memories of college, that cholera is bacterial, due to cholera vibrio and therefore not viral.
Otherwise, with regard to viruses, the most dangerous are the ones that are deadly, but not too much. If the subject dies too quickly, it will not infect many people. Whereas if the virus kills slowly, the wearer can contaminate many people.
Finally, even in the case of haemorrhagic fevers, there is a percentage of people who survive the infection.
If it is 10% of the population, we will fall to less than a billion. This will make a big reset to the human population ...
Otherwise, with regard to viruses, the most dangerous are the ones that are deadly, but not too much. If the subject dies too quickly, it will not infect many people. Whereas if the virus kills slowly, the wearer can contaminate many people.
Finally, even in the case of haemorrhagic fevers, there is a percentage of people who survive the infection.
If it is 10% of the population, we will fall to less than a billion. This will make a big reset to the human population ...
Last edited by Former Oceano the 28 / 01 / 09, 23: 12, 1 edited once.
0 x
[MODO Mode = ON]
Zieuter but do not think less ...
Peugeot Ion (VE), KIA Optime PHEV, VAE, no electric motorcycle yet...
Zieuter but do not think less ...
Peugeot Ion (VE), KIA Optime PHEV, VAE, no electric motorcycle yet...
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79117
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
If it's batérien antibiotics, ketotomatik !!!
Hihihihihi !!
Good remark Oceano! The "more better" level of mortality are the retroviruses contagious by air ... where then the viruses with a long incubation period but while being contagious (not know the exact word) ...
Of this kind there:
http://www.stephenking-fr.net/articles.php?lng=fr&pg=81
http://www.allocine.fr/film/fichefilm_g ... 26113.html
Otherwise there is junk food and oil ... but it takes longer ...
Hihihihihi !!
Good remark Oceano! The "more better" level of mortality are the retroviruses contagious by air ... where then the viruses with a long incubation period but while being contagious (not know the exact word) ...
Of this kind there:
http://www.stephenking-fr.net/articles.php?lng=fr&pg=81
http://www.allocine.fr/film/fichefilm_g ... 26113.html
Otherwise there is junk food and oil ... but it takes longer ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
That's right, there are about 4 billion human too many ... as to whether it's the poor or the rich ..?
I propose a collective suicide: I have already started: alcohol slowly kills
I propose a collective suicide: I have already started: alcohol slowly kills
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
The problem with this kind of talk from Doctor Strangelove is that some populists will want to carry it out easily, of course putting others in the "to be deleted" category. And of course there will always be an audience to applaud, those who knew how to put themselves on the "right" side at the right time ....
Honestly, how many bastards (diminutive!) Have used this scheme to make wars ????? .......
Honestly, how many bastards (diminutive!) Have used this scheme to make wars ????? .......
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
Certainly ! To govern (or to be governed) is to foresee!
Apparently, the leanest people pollute the least, because they are poor, so it is they who must be kept. Maybe we could eat the biggest ones. The opposite is less interesting: yes, there is a lot of malnutrition on earth, but there is almost nothing to eat on it.
In short: By the time we finish eating the obese Americans, I will have had time to diet and give up the aperitifs.
In fact, I'm not sure if there are 4 billion more people on Earth or 1 or 2 billion in some countries.
Apparently, the leanest people pollute the least, because they are poor, so it is they who must be kept. Maybe we could eat the biggest ones. The opposite is less interesting: yes, there is a lot of malnutrition on earth, but there is almost nothing to eat on it.
In short: By the time we finish eating the obese Americans, I will have had time to diet and give up the aperitifs.
In fact, I'm not sure if there are 4 billion more people on Earth or 1 or 2 billion in some countries.
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79117
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 10972
elephant wrote:Apparently, the leanest people pollute the least, because they are poor, so it is they who must be kept.
Yes, but in the same genre there is an "ecological attitude" which consists in always saying: it is others who pollute.
So for an owner of an 4x4 SUV, the one that pollutes is not him because he uses a new engine so clean. For him, whoever is the most is the smicard with his 205 80 years.
Conversely for the smicard they are all rich with their big 4x4 and who fly all 4 morning pollute the most.
I think the smicard is more right
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
There does not seem to be a virus so effective in transmission and so virulent that it would seriously threaten the human species.
Here, you remind me of the declaration of Apocalypse (X-Men) at the UN, in which he orders the leaders to slaughter 90% of their herd (sic), otherwise he will release a gas that will kill 100%.
Otherwise, the Earth does not seem overpopulated. We produce more food than we need to feed everyone (the economic system prevents it from being distributed in such a way as to feed everyone, yes), and in any case it is obvious that the Earth would support 9 billion better. of Chinese than Americans 1.
Given the demographics of the ultra-consumer rich countries, the planet is not so badly barred.
Here, you remind me of the declaration of Apocalypse (X-Men) at the UN, in which he orders the leaders to slaughter 90% of their herd (sic), otherwise he will release a gas that will kill 100%.
Otherwise, the Earth does not seem overpopulated. We produce more food than we need to feed everyone (the economic system prevents it from being distributed in such a way as to feed everyone, yes), and in any case it is obvious that the Earth would support 9 billion better. of Chinese than Americans 1.
Given the demographics of the ultra-consumer rich countries, the planet is not so badly barred.
0 x
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 22 Replies
- 8407 views
-
Last message by GuyGadebois
View the latest post
17/09/19, 11:51A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 0 Replies
- 3424 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
30/05/14, 10:02A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 1 Replies
- 3121 views
-
Last message by Ahmed
View the latest post
21/05/10, 22:42A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 4 Replies
- 4215 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
02/03/08, 09:36A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
-
- 9 Replies
- 7638 views
-
Last message by Gregconstruct
View the latest post
20/12/07, 19:51A subject posted in the forum : Company and Philosophy
Back to "Society and Philosophy"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 204 guests