The share of true VS false in the 'complosphere'

[Obamot]

Here, I burst the abscess (virtual) of who you know, and who wants to shoot the dynamics of fo-fo.

Let's try to “source” everything so as not to give way to jokes... I start voluntarily in chapter 4 on “Property”.

“In the future you will have nothing but you will be happy…”

Chronologically, we would be there (in blue) I added in green, which is very advanced, but we do not yet see the question of “deprivation of private property” (this would be future music?)

6E1FBF38-36E0-407E-9AC7-D85105C4C7DF.jpeg (115.81 Kio) Consulté 1523 fois

It lacks what is related to the “cancel society” but a bit of everything related to web control does.

Let's start with this document [of the “complosphere”, obviously] but which summarizes a certain number of things, and around which this sentence is articulated:
“In the future you will have nothing but you will be happy…”

Who regularly comes up in comments and sites considered “conspiratorial” (are they? We will see)

https://vecteur-douceur.over-blog.com/2 ... tie-4.html

You will find other elements in this reference site to feed the reflection: https://rairfoundation.com/watch-lootin ... art-three/

....to be continued !

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

[Obamot]

I make an exception for this thread, I want to answer all your questions.

What don't you understand?

You are the one who started this debate by asking “more serious in the sources"Here you are served...

And yet here you are in sarcasm!

You should know.... What do you think is wrong and risky in there:

“In the future you will have nothing but you will be happy…”

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

I make an exception for this thread, I want to answer all your questions.

You are the one who started this debate by asking “more serious in the sources"Here you are served...

And yet here you are in sarcasm!

You should know.... What do you think is wrong and risky in there:

“In the future you will have nothing but you will be happy…”

[Obamot]

This is one of the advanced topics.
It's not mine, huh...

What do you think? Are you kicking in touch or what

be nice guy How do you expect us to progress, if you don't help us. You're the one who started the thing and there you go back!

[Obamot]

I think there is a misunderstanding

Vector Douceur-Association, it's serious business!

If the source is potentially “rotten”, it is possibly wanted: it is marked in the title: “Part of true VS false”.
But is the THEME really serious for you, or rotten?

I really don't see where you're coming from.

[Obamot]

Okay, so if no one disputes the current approaching the “end of private property” this is considered to be the same acquired.

I move on to the next topic:

https://rairfoundation.com/great-reset- ... eme-video/

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

Yeah, yeah of course, go ahead and roll out your never seen scoops...

[Obamot]

Ah good, already two themes that shut you up or are you still kicking in touch?

At least we can say that you are brave eh-eh-eh

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

No no, not at all, I support you to death: "Yeah, go for it on the Big Reset, you've never done it". I find your topic relevant, interesting, enlightened, documented... so fascinating. You are improving and I am with you. Persevere!

Ps: On the second theme (Which one?), ditto! Go, go O'Fayot, go!