Dunning-Kruger Effect: Incompetence Confidence Bias (Ultracrepidarianism)

[Christophe]

Third sheet in the psycho web series: the Dunning-Kruger effect of overconfidence in your ... incompetence ... but you still need some basics before you can show your incompetence ...

In fact, without being a specialist (oops ...), I think it is precisely the ultracrepidarianism of the media (net included) that Étienne Klein is currently denouncing: sciences-et-technologies / etienne-klein-les-ingenieurs-frankly-we-don't-hear-them-much-t16625.html

Ah yes, after checking, the Wiki page does refer to Dunning-Kruger: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultracr%C3%A9pidarianisme (so I didn't do ultracrepidarianism there! )

In France the word would have appeared from 2014.

In 2019-2020, the concept has experienced a resurgence of interest with the appearance of Covid-19, a disease initially little known to the general public, but quickly commented with assurance by a number of non-specialists, lavish in opinions and injunctions . The physicist and philosopher of science Étienne Klein has underlined in several writings and interviews this tendency, natural but increased in the context of the health crisis, to speak about things that one does not know, often by introducing the subject by the formula: " I am not a doctor, but I think that ... ”. He recalls that the cognitive bias which leads the less qualified in a field to overestimate their competence was studied at the end of the XNUMXth century by American psychologists David Dunning (in) and Justin Kruger. This bias is known as the “Dunning-Kruger effect”.

DunningKruger.jpg (489.43 KiB) Viewed 5147 times

[eclectron]

Fortunately we have here Barenboim of climate, physics, medicine (it's very simple, everything! ), it raises the level

Sorry for this excess of optimism, there is only one Barenboim here
We know where the B of his nickname comes from now ...

[Obamot]

I do not know why ( ) but I was absolutely sure that a new “psy thread” would emerge ...

It would be well to specify to you that the “psychic threads” are only useful for those who post them or who answer them, but without being “guided” by someone, they are useless. Protective reflexes prevail. We saw him with you and Janic, who nevertheless supported you and so that he would then go up against you, but it was useless. Each one having its own problematic, ABC which you quote also has its own, I do not escape it either ... That is why it is useless to answer me

You unintentionally put your finger on the most important problem of forum.

Third sheet in the psycho web series

Do you think that creating these threads has the value of therapeutic consultation? I hope not.

[Christophe]

I do not know why ( ) but I was absolutely sure that a new “psy thread” would emerge ...

That's a funny one !!!

Maybe if you really read what others write (and not askew 1 out of 3 words) that would take away your doubts !!

Bin yes I specified that there would be 6 files ... 1 per day this week .. .

[Obamot]

She is not "good" it is that you are seriously reached man!

Keep them to yourself eh, even though it is all very interesting, keep them to yourself, that's better.

Or you want to transform a section of your forum in a psychiatric practice? I wouldn't participate!

Some people have been tackling you on this several times, but you seem to be avoiding the subject. (oh no, you put on 'smileys' ...)

[eclectron]

I do not know why ( ) but I was absolutely sure that a new “psy thread” would emerge ...

It would be well to specify to you that the “psychic threads” are only useful for those who post them or who answer them, but without being “guided” by someone, they are useless. Protective reflexes prevail. We saw him with you and Janic, who nevertheless supported you and so that he would then go up against you, but it was useless. Each one having its own problematic, ABC which you quote also has its own, I do not escape it either ... That is why it is useless to answer me

You unintentionally put your finger on the most important problem of forum.

Third sheet in the psycho web series

Do you think that creating these threads has the value of therapeutic consultation? I hope not.

Who are you addressing? Christophe, or me or both, it's hard to understand.
if it's mine, the B was not that of ABC but that of oBamot.

Janic never understood that I was talking about things that I NEVER claimed to be. Personally, I touch on the subject.
It was he who presupposed that I was posing as 'awake' or 'savior', when no, I report things that are still little circulating in the general public, as a journalist would.
Likewise ABC (and Exnihilo) presupposes that I am the 'savior' with the handbook of the perfect sustainable living turnkey.
I never claimed it, I just intend to think about it, the intention to participate and to confront ideas with a constructive aim. (I had ... seen the carnage ...)
I only receive destructive criticism ... normal "Protective reflexes some Boomer or conformists prevail. "

Getting assaulted on bogus lawsuits, I don't like.
and it is to be stupid to persist in staying on the subject of the false trial. (mock trial = presuppose that I claim ...)

"Protective reflexes prevail." Absolutely, and I don't escape it either, especially when you cross the line.
This sheet at least has the merit of raising awareness about its own claim and making people think or not ...

[Obamot]

You see Christophe ... the consultations are open, and for once I agree with ABC.
It agrees with my opinion in its logic.

I stop there where everyone understood ...?

[eclectron]

You see Christophe ... the consultations are open, and for once I agree with ABC.
It agrees with my opinion in its logic.

I stop there where everyone understood ...?

I did not understand and I am asking you for explanations.
or do you plan to stay in "fake ass" mode?

[Christophe]

She is not "good" it is that you are seriously reached man!

And you seriously hit the bar ... you know yesterday's file: society-and-philosophy / law-of-brandolini-or-the-principle-of-asymmetry-du-barratin-des-fake-news-t16737.html

What idiot have you come back to me since your OFF for 2 weeks (sorry but there is no other word ...) ... the others will judge ...

[Obamot]

Didn't you read Eclectron well, or is he talking about ABC ..?

[or not...

Since you force me to answer you for me it will be “to”It does not make“ think ”it is intellectual masturbation.
You forgot to read this:

This is why it is useless to answer me

... and anyway, the navelists, first concerned, do not understand anything. Basically you are all in a “sacrificial” logic (me too by answering, I should not ) ...