What we are talking about: a "world war" which does not speak its name, we are there!
Very hypocritically we hardly talk about Ukraine anymore ... And yet
- there is the war from the Urals to the Golan Heights ... 1)
- not yet the 3rd if not economical ...
- the same cause and effect relationship, meticulously kept under wraps!
Is the borderline between latent conflict, civil war, or war of interference difficult to define?
Who is who, who does what, for what purpose and why, things should be clarified a little.
Even after having shot 2 or 3 civilian planes (?) Since the crash of the 1st Malaysian Airlines flight remains a mystery (could we have hidden the place where it crashed so as not to have to say that it had been shot down? ?), and regarding flight AH 5017 (crashed in Algeria) it was not excluded either that it could be a "criminal act". As for the 3rd, impossible to deny since it fell in "war zone" (well, so that it falls where it fell and that one can not deny it any more [?], Had to be damned well aiming , it is a region that fits in a pocket handkerchief, if we counted the speed of the plane, the time that a missile had to take to acquire the target the path to the jet to bring it down and the time what would the debris take to descend, taking into account the inertia and the wind speed ...
Too early it fell in an area controlled by the elected government, too late it fell in ... Russia!
We must not "see evil everywhere", but it is hard to believe that these would be only "unfortunate coincidences".
Can NATO shamelessly continue to go and "tickle" Putin? Honestly, this country has already been sufficiently fragmented like that, without anyone coming yet to walk on the beds of its "zone of influence" ... But the truth is undoubtedly elsewhere, in a blackmail of the The West (or shouldn't we rather speak of a Washington-Tel Aviv axis?) Which probably wishes to extend its hegemony by playing the saviors of democracy in the tribal regions, to mask the progress of "globalization". I mean the stock market plane game is bringing the business world to ever more fierce pressure which results in wars!
So 3rd World War to achieve a "World Government", by wetting the Western countries to make them enter the war according to the paradigm well known since the Bu $ ch-Obama era:
—
"You are with us, or you are against us!"
Or 3rd "Permanent World War" so that the destruction gives "a breath of fresh air" to the fratricidal economy of the financial vultures? Since then everything must be rebuilt and therefore business starts again on the blood of the vanquished?
Frankly, are we not witnessing a dangerous goatee game, with on the one hand those who support the countries with tribal powers and on the other the witch hunt of those who would support them !? Thus, neither China, nor Russia (nor yet others ...) can support NATO's action against the last anti-Western strongholds, under penalty that subsequently, when they will really be the last. , the West is trying with them what it has done with what it calls being "dictatorships" (although it is not said that it is not, but what is involved- And if there were not, but really tribal functioning, like precisely: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya and some others ...)
After reading a report on the Arab Emirates in the region close to the current "field of operation", we understand better what is happening. And why the West penetrates these regions illegally and with total impunity: it is that between them, the Arab countries would be very divided, because Saudi Arabia (big friend of the Bush at the time) is ultra majority in influence and in territory, as much as in economic power ... And therefore the others do not trust him!
The problem for waging war is economic ... If we deviate from the adjustment variables by 5 or 6 points, it is that the whole world economy which is in danger of collapsing ... This is the explanation of these hidden conflicts, so as not to set the whole area on fire and blood at once.
In the meantime, we can be fully reassured: journalists and politicians do not have the internet or they have amnesia ... since for many of them:
- they "don't know" that the CIA funded the "Arab Spring" uprising 1)
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast ... pposition/
- They "don't know" that members of the CIA were also involved in Maiden Square (Ukraine), when there were the barricades! They do not know either that at the same time, BHL harangued the crowd in the same place, even though there was not even a question of "civil war".
http://www.lepoint.fr/monde/ukraine-la- ... 233_24.php
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzevSdRglSo
They "do not know" either, that it is the same agency which caused trouble in Syria by funding the Al Quaeda group of the "terrorist zentils" (Jabhat Al-Nosra) clan, those to whom we can give weapons, while the "ultras" of Al Quaeda (the bad guys!) would not be frequent!
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_al-N ... 13-2014.29
At this stage, none of them knows who is zigzagging which journalist? To comment on the news, they make a point of doing it short-sighted, but when it comes to talking about the "causes" of the current tragedies, they suddenly lost their memory!
De Gaul and Mitterand must turn around in their respective graves, to see the last two French Presidents being aligned with Washington while being at attention of the financial Europe of Mario Draghi (and the other "old" ones of "Goldm @n S @ chs ") ...
Who said strongly the 3rd that they kill each other ...?
1)
If we take into account the unstable situation in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Georgia ...
2)
fr.euronews.net/2011/04 wrote:Despite the repression, the challenge has not weakened in Syria. New testimony of this movement, a monster demonstration in the streets of Homs, in the center of the country. Thousands of protesters demand departure from Bashar al-Assad. They have started a sit-in which they say will last until the fall of the regime.
At the same time, Wikileaks claims that Washington has secretly funded Syrian opposition groups.
Reaction from US State Department spokesperson Mark Toner: «We are not trying to undermine this government. What we are doing in Syria, through the support of civil society [!!!] is to build democratic institutions. Frankly, that is what we are trying to do elsewhere in the world. ”
The United States has once again called on the Syrian President to respond to the aspirations of his people. Again on Sunday, at least 11 protesters were killed in the Homs region.
Original source "replaced" by Euronews:
http://fr.euronews.net/2011/04/19/la-sy ... ion-armee/
Source in English by CNN, still "active":http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast ... pposition/
In English, CNN wrote:Abdeh denied the US government is providing such support and said the channel broadcasts on a commercial satellite.
Acting State Department spokesman Mark Toner declined to discuss specific activities Washington was undertaking with the Syrian opposition but said they were "no different" than similar democracy and governance programs the United States was undertaking in democratic countries around the world.
"We're not working to undermine that government," Toner said. "What we are trying to do in Syria, through our civil society support, is to build the kind of democratic institutions, frankly, that we're trying to do in countries around the globe. What's different, I think, in this situation is that the Syrian government perceives this kind of assistance as a threat to its control over the Syrian people. "