Ancient astronaut hypothesis or New euhemerism

[oli 80]

Good evening, here is a subject that is often mentioned here and the, on TV and on the net as example the show alien theory on rmc discovery
which is inspired by the writings of Erich Von Daniken
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken

and here are some sites with quite evocative pientures of passage of "visitors" a long time ago on earth http://www.ancient-symbols.com/french/s ... tures.html

the ezekiel mink that I had put in another subject

[oli 80]

Good evening, here is the link on the visions of ezekiel
http://alchemicaldiagrams.blogspot.fr/2 ... sions.html

this subject is as vast as knowing whether we are alone in the universe, but as Erich Von Daniken says, why search in space while the answers are on earth hidden in
buildings of ancient civilizations

[oli 80]

Hello, here are some more news on this topic
http://dossiers.secrets.free.fr/anomali ... estres.htm
http://mysteredumondetizzy.blogspot.fr/ ... enque.html

http://www.sciences-fictions-histoires. ... sacco.html

here you are interested

cordially

[moinsdewatt]

It's an obsession.

[oli 80]

Hello, no, it 's just that I like the subject, but not to the point of making an obsession, I admit that I like the show alien theory on rmc discovery that passes every Saturday night

I opened this topic to avoid creating confusion with the topic "are we alone in the universe"

that does not mean that when we are interested in something that we necessarily make an obsession

[Cuicui]

that does not mean that when we are interested in something that we necessarily make an obsession

+1
But I have the impression that there is that gene.

[Obamot]

It's an obsession.

From the moment when someone 3 post once without reaction, to trace a thread that has not hit anyone, we can indeed wonder what it is.

néoévémérisme

neo or not, it is not because we see "representations"in different forms and other icons of deification, that one passes for all that from convictions to" of reality ", and even less than that makes anything of it"interesting". For whom? Beware of self-conviction!

I took a look and all that is based at best only on paralogisms (at worst on sophisms). Hence the lack of interest likely ... You've got used to better Oli 80.

[Cuicui]

Hence the lack of probable interest ...

It is not because we do not respond to a post that we are not interested in it. I appreciate thatoli 80 reactivates this post, and I know I'm not the only one.
It's not because we do not like that we have to believe ourselves obliged to disgust others.

[oli 80]

Re, it is true that I posted three messages in a row, the first two were from May this year, the second because I had not immediately found the third link and I could not edit anymore,

the one I posted today is to share the latest findings, in short I had opened this line of discussion because the subject of the theory of ancient astronauts was mentioned here https://www.econologie.com/forums/sommes-nou ... 12248.html

but not by me, I had only participated in the discourse and the subject left in lollipop, at the request of Christophe I opened this topic to avoid getting the brushes in the discussions and have two different subjects
cordially

[Janic]

cuicui hello

It's not because we do not like that we have to believe ourselves obliged to disgust others.

how true! this world would be very sad if everyone believed the same thing, had the same interests, etc ... For now it is only reserved for machines even with AI.