The maximum power dissipation must not therefore always be in direct terms, but in terms of final efficiency!
Of course! Thus consumption (and pollution) motor vehicle gradually decreases while their consumption (and pollution!) Overall increases inexorably. There is no contradiction to the principle of maximizing the distribution of energy in these developments.
Similarly, in line with the measures to limit pollution on the device, it is to stay in the
Pigmentation compatible with accepted standards for public health; standards they themselves set to maximize traffic ... so the energy dissipation.
Thermodynamics allows us to understand the fallacy of the so-called "runoff" theory, according to which the wealth which is in the hands of a small number inevitably ends up spreading over the whole of society.
This might be true in a closed system, entropy effect, otherwise known thermodynamic leveling;
ie that it would eventually establish for each monad an average level of fortune in a stable state. Each euro having in this case the same value for each one, the exchanges would be reduced to the strict minimum (still it would be advisable to know what a "minimum" is!).
In an open system, there are still affected sources of wealth differential as it is always possible to find agents so poor they agree to dissipate their energy in favor of richer than them and thus maintain differential: this is a feedback loop that maximizes the dissipation of energy.
This demonstration does not completely contradicts the one I posted in a previous message, namely that greater equality would generate an additional expense to that of a small oligarchy optimizing the dissipation observe if exist both a large middle class and a very poor class: it is possible to calculate the ideal proportions (so to speak!) through calculations completely out of my reach!
Warning! Maximize energy dissipation means not wasting the most energy in absolute terms, but waste as possible
relatively in a given context.