Research on cold fusion is it credible?

Innovations, ideas or patents for sustainable development. Decrease in energy consumption, reduction of pollution, improvement of yields or processes ... Myths or reality about inventions of the past or the future: the inventions of Tesla, Newman, Perendev, Galey, Bearden, cold fusion ...
Tagor
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 06/04/07, 12:31

Research on cold fusion is it credible?




by Tagor » 09/12/07, 11:07

for those who would like more information on cold fusion
here is a presentation of:
Jean-Paul Biberian
Born June 26, 1946 in Marseille


-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------



Diplomas Engineer National School of Electricity and Mechanics of Nancy 1969

Diploma of Advanced Studies in Crystallography 1970

Doctor of Engineering, Aix-Marseille II University 1971

Doctor of Science, ENSCP, University of Paris VI 1975



-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------
Cold Fusion

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------



It was on March 23, 1989, that the whole world learned that two electrochemists: Stanley Pons of the University of Utah in the United States and Martin Fleischman of that of Southampton in Great Britain had just shown that one could carrying out nuclear reactions at low temperature by passing electric current through an electrochemical cell composed of an electrode called a palladium cathode and a second platinum called an anode, in an electrolyte based on heavy water. The two professors observed that they obtained more heat than the electrical energy supplied. The amount of heat released could not be explained by a chemical reaction, so they immediately thought of a nuclear reaction.

Although no fundamental law of physics was violated on this assumption, the scientists were extremely skeptical. Many experiments were immediately made in many laboratories to verify the say of the two discoverers. Obviously many failed, but some succeeded. The US Department of Energy formed a team to analyze the phenomenon, and concluded that no special funding was needed for these studies, but that it could be done with standard budgets. This conclusion was in practice regarded as a ban on researching this subject which was brought to the level of quackery. Pons and Fleischman were called bad experimenters, even fraudsters, and had a very difficult time being heard.

Research on the Cold Fusion disappeared from mainstream media, and for everyone, especially scientists, the matter was closed, the subject did not exist. But many people of all stripes very often continued with makeshift means to try to improve the first results. The big criticism that was made in 1989 was the lack of reproducibility of the experiments. In science, and especially in physics, one must be able to reproduce an experiment as many times as desired, and by different groups. It was not the case at the time. Some experiences were positive and gave excess heat, and others gave nothing. The inventors of this new science quickly understood that the first batch of palladium they had received worked well, while the following ones no longer worked. It must be said that the manufacturer of palladium had changed its method of production, and did not want to reveal its manufacturing secrets!

Different teams got to work. They sought to understand the different aspects of palladium metallurgy, and little by little improvements came. Other methods to highlight the phenomenon have been developed. At the end of the day, we now know that the phenomenon is much more general than we thought. It is no longer simply a phenomenon of fusion of two deuterium nuclei (a hydrogen isotope) to make helium, but much more complex nuclear reactions, ranging from the fusion of nuclei to fission ( break a heavy nucleus to produce lighter ones by giving off heat), and even the transmutation of one element into another (the dream of alchemists).

Nuclear reactions were discovered by Beckerel, Pierre and Marie Curie. It was they who demonstrated for the first time that the atom was not necessarily stable. They have shown that certain atoms such as radium can transform into another. It was the first breach in Lavoisier's sacrosanct law "Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is transformed". Later, experiments showed that uranium bombarded by neutrons would crack, and turn into two other lighter nuclei, as well as two or three neutrons with a release of energy. It is this reaction which is at the origin of the chain reaction at the base of current nuclear reactors, and of the atomic bomb.

Another form of nuclear reaction is possible. It is the fusion of light atoms to produce heavier ones with also a release of heat. This is what happens in the sun and the stars, where two nuclei of hydrogen merge. To succeed in such a reaction, it is necessary to make two nuclei of the same electrical sign touch each other, which tend to repel each other. In the sun, it is the very high temperature and pressure which reign in the center of the star, which allow these reactions to occur. The nuclei then come into contact despite the force of repulsion. When the nuclei are close to each other, the nuclear forces take over and allow the two nuclei to attract and merge. For fifty years, we know how to make this kind of reaction with the hydrogen bomb. In this case, in order to obtain the required high temperatures, a first nuclear fission bomb strongly compresses the hydrogen which fuses. This reaction is obviously not easy to carry out. We therefore know how to do it suddenly, but doing it in a controlled way is much more difficult. The international project ITER (International Torus Experimental Reactor), which will be installed in Cadarache, aims to show the feasibility of thermonuclear fusion. The method used is to confine the hydrogen in a toroidal enclosure. The gas is brought to a very high temperature, and prevented from touching the walls by strong magnetic fields. The gases are so hot that on the one hand they ionize, that is to say that the hydrogen nucleus separates from its single electron and on the other hand they reach such speeds that they can collide and merge to produce in the case of the ITER project helium and a neutron.

Cold fusion performs the same type of fusion reaction but in a solid and without radioactivity. The initial idea is to confine in the space between the atoms of a metal two atoms of hydrogen to force them to react. When two deuterium atoms fuse in this way, helium is produced, a very harmless gas that is used to inflate balloons! In reality, the phenomenon is much more complex, and more varied than that. During the last fifteen years it has been noticed that very special and unknown reactions take place in materials charged with hydrogen or its isotopes. Not only has it been shown that cold fusion can be done, but scientists have also shown that side reactions of transmutation and fission of nuclei can take place.

These phenomena are therefore not the exception. A whole field of physics is opening up. We are at the dawn of a new science whose consequences are absolutely unpredictable, in the good sense of the word. The applications seem immense: from the production of clean energy (no radioactive waste, no greenhouse gases), to the treatment of waste of all kinds: radioactive or heavy metals. Another part of science is opening up. This is what we now call Nuclear Reactions in Condensed Matter.

This new avenue of research is still in its infancy. After more than sixteen years of work, we are only sure of one thing: there is indeed a new phenomenon which had passed between the cracks of the net until now. On the other hand, we do not yet know which theory is capable of explaining it. Many of them are already supposed to explain the phenomenon. They range from the most classical quantum mechanics to assemblies of neutrons, vibrations of the metallic network, new atomic arrangements, magnetic monopoles and many others.

Scientists work in this field in fifteen countries and meet regularly.
In Russia, there is an annual meeting which brings together a large part of the 29 Russian laboratories working in this field.
In Italy, every two years, a very informal international meeting takes place in Asti, which takes stock of this work.
In Japan a learned society has been created which brings together the Japanese working in this field.
Finally, on a regular basis, almost every year an international conference takes place: the International Conference on Cold Fusion, the International Conference on Cold Fusion. ICCF11, the eleventh took place in Marseille from October 29 to November 5, 2004. 170 researchers from 20 different countries participated in this conference. The conference began on Sunday October 29 with a day of training in cold fusion for specialists, but also for people new to the field and who wish to know the basics of this specialty. On Tuesday, November 2, the conference took place at the Faculty of Sciences of Luminy, open to all scientists who wanted it. Finally the week ended with a press conference for scientific journals, but also for the mainstream media.

The last conference, ICCF12, took place in Japan from November 28 to December 2, 2005.
The next will take place in June 2007 in Russia.

It seems appropriate to us in this period when energy becomes a global concern to bring this information to the attention of the public, and to announce that other ways than those known exist. That nothing has been decided yet, and that other possibilities exist. It's not just oil, gas, nuclear and wind turbines. Perhaps in a few years, if we give ourselves the means, another inexhaustible and clean source of energy will be accessible to all.


ICCF12 "International Conference on Cold Fusion" reports
ICCF10
ICCF 9
[/ Quote]
0 x
Tagor
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 06/04/07, 12:31

Re: is research on cold fusion credible?




by Tagor » 09/12/07, 11:21

recent conference:
http://www.iscmns.org/catania07/

Home Membership Search / Site Map FAQ News Sicily ICCF14 FP7 JCMNS

Copyright © 2003-2007 The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science.








8th International Workshop on Anomalies in Hydrogen/Deuterium Loaded Metals
October 13-18, 2007
Sheraton Catania, Hotel and Conference Center
Via Antonello da Messina 45, 95020 Cannizzaro (CT), Sicily, Italy


Organizing Committee
William Collis (Chair), Antonio Spallone, Sebastiano Truglio, Fulvio Frisone, Xingzhong Li

Co-Organizing Sponsors
Fondazione Fulvio Frisone, ISCMNS

For all inquiries regarding this workshop contact catania@iscmns.org

Follow up
Program & PresentationsPhoto Gallery
Workshop Poster (A3) (download and display it!)

Lease
The workshop was held in the (4 star) Sheraton Hotel near Catania, Sicily just 100m from the sea shore (with private beach). All 165 rooms and suites have air conditioning, bath room, TV, hair dryer etc. There is a health center, restaurant, bars on the premises. The organization booked a block of rooms at the Sheraton and 5 nights accommodation and meals was included in the workshop fees. How to get there. GPS coordinates 37 ° 32 '32 "N, 15 ° 08' 12" E
0 x
User avatar
Capt_Maloche
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 4559
Registration: 29/07/06, 11:14
Location: Ile-de-France
x 42




by Capt_Maloche » 09/12/07, 12:52

here?

Remundo didn't go there? :D
0 x
"Consumption is similar to a search consolation, a way to fill a growing existential void. With, the key, a lot of frustration and a little guilt, increasing the environmental awareness." (Gérard Mermet)
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
Tagor
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 06/04/07, 12:31




by Tagor » 09/12/07, 16:50

Capt_Maloche wrote:here?

Remundo didn't go there? :D

if that's the case he will no longer be able to say that I don't
provided not the right references

in his chair it's easy to say that JL Naudin is doing
anything but it is still him who
first validated these anomalies in France!

in the publications there is mention of anomaly
by abuse of language have often said about unity
all is to agree on the meaning of the words
without stopping ostentatiously
0 x
User avatar
Cuicui
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 3547
Registration: 26/04/05, 10:14
x 6

Re: Is research on cold fusion credible?




by Cuicui » 09/12/07, 16:56

[quote = "tagor"] This is not to overshadow the cold fusion, but I find that the article could also have cited magnetic necking and the results obtained by the Sandia Z-machine ... : Cheesy:
But it is true that a 3,7 billion degree merger is not particularly cold. Am squarely off topic. I go out.
Last edited by Cuicui the 15 / 12 / 07, 01: 14, 1 edited once.
0 x
Tagor
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 06/04/07, 12:31

Re: Is research on cold fusion credible?




by Tagor » 09/12/07, 17:22

Cuicui wrote:This is not to bring shade to the cold fusion, but I find that the article could also have cited magnetic necking and the results obtained by the Z-machine from Sandia ... : Cheesy:


biberian is plugged into extension and is rather attracted
by transmutations ...

it seems to me that it would have more to do with the explanations
possible of the gille-pantone than with the z machine

for my part I have no unfavorable or favorable opinion
on the z machine, the only thing that worries me is to see
systemic demolition comes from some ... who refuses to see
the disproportionate treatment brought to the solutions
possible for the future ...


so I prefer to withdraw from sterile debates

I would also like someone to explain to me why the word
on unit triggers as much verbal slippage?
0 x
Tagor
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 06/04/07, 12:31

Re: Is research on cold fusion credible?




by Tagor » 09/12/07, 19:25

example of application of cold fusion:

NEAL GLEESON

See Cincinatti Group.

A reduction in radioactivity has been noted in more than 100 tests. If renowned scientists repeat these experiments, this process would be useful for eliminating certain wastes, such as the 66 million gallons of polluted liquids stored in more than 100 tanks at the Hanford Washington nuclear site.



CINCINNATI GROUP

Holloman & Associates, 9772 Princeton-Glendale Rd, Cincinnati Ohio 45246


TEL: (513) 874-4943 FAX: (513) 874-6982


Internet http://www.cgis.net/concygrp

The research results of this privately funded group (supported since 1994 by Eugène Mallove and Hal Fox) and whose members still wished to remain anonymous in 1996 were presented for the first time, at a symposium on 20/01 / 96. We have known since that it is Stan Neal and Rod Gleason who do not have a classical scientific background but, being part of a group of Charismatic Christians, they claim to have received divine revelations which enabled them to realize this great advances in scientific technology which they have made widely public since 1997.

On 23/12/95 a patent was filed on the following subject: "A process by which natural radioactivity can be significantly reduced using a specially designed reactor." Agreements to demonstrate this capability have been made with a company commissioned by the government to clean up one of the many radioactive sites in the United States.

The process of converting radioactive elements into stable elements over a period of a few hours takes millions of years in nature (14 billion for thorium). However, Neal and Gleason claim to transmute thorium, a radioactive metal, into two neutral metals, titanium and copper. The measurements give a 72% reduction in radioactivity, all in one hour, under the action of an electric current of 300 watts, in a steel tank. The process is reliable, completely reproducible, low energy, inexpensive, fast, it is a modern alchemy.

Neal and Gleason also claim that by increasing the size of their transmutation chambers, they will be able to effectively and safely remove radioactive waste and plutonium.

During the 1996 symposium, E. Mallove screened a short film showing a miniature fireball, a device powered by 70 watts that creates a high temperature and melts the surface of a ceramic tile (the point of which melting is about 4500 ° F). We can see on another video the fusion of a piece of quartz and a piece of copper.

Dr. Robert Bass who had come to Cincinnati to prepare the preliminary draft application of the 1995 patent, had been upset by seeing the electrochemical fireball (see photos on the American site) which he had observed during the transmutation experience. He was reinforced by a verse from the Bible confirming to him the validity of this discovery where "the Adversary" did not intervene.

In September 97, Robert R. Liversage graduated in Chemistry with a long experience in atomic spectroscopy, working at the DataChem Laboratory, in Canada, confirms the results announced by the Cincinnati group. He carried out a rigorous evaluation (control samples, quality of materials and containers, etc.) with measuring instruments such as the ICP / MS Perkin Elmer / Sciex Elan 250 and other advanced techniques. He found that 80% (72% with the “scintillation” meter RM-60 micro rntntgen radiation monitor, connected to a computer) of thorium had been transmuted. The concentration of titanium was 10 times higher than that of copper. In addition, the isotopic proportions were significantly altered, 1800% deviation from the natural norm for copper, and 560% for titanium. (For more details: RR Liversage PO Box 1262, Covington KY 41012 - 1262, or by email or by the Cincinnati Group website).
0 x
User avatar
Capt_Maloche
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 4559
Registration: 29/07/06, 11:14
Location: Ile-de-France
x 42




by Capt_Maloche » 09/12/07, 20:07

that would be good, but from there to check in the bible ... must not mess around
0 x
"Consumption is similar to a search consolation, a way to fill a growing existential void. With, the key, a lot of frustration and a little guilt, increasing the environmental awareness." (Gérard Mermet)
OUCH, OUILLE, OUCH, AAHH! ^ _ ^
Tagor
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 534
Registration: 06/04/07, 12:31




by Tagor » 10/12/07, 09:05

Capt_Maloche wrote:that would be good, but from there to check in the bible ... must not mess around


Yes indeed ...
this text is taken from the quant man website which sometimes publishes
questionable or unconfirmed information
you have to read between the lines and take the post info!
(elimination of radioactive waste)


that said, Louis Boutard, uneducated at the start, became a monk
he had access to lots of books

after studying several languages ​​he was inspired by
writings and designed devices, without moving parts, which
were producing electricity ... still a clean source and
seemingly endless of energy ...

while the scientific world is working on questionable solutions !!
0 x
Chatham
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 536
Registration: 03/12/07, 13:40




by Chatham » 10/12/07, 09:19

Tagor wrote:Yes indeed ...
this text is taken from the site quant homme which sometimes publishes
questionable or unconfirmed information



It is the least that we can say: there are so many mystifiers who lay their delusions there that this site does not have the slightest interest for me, when with the cold fusion, it is hardly better: the we have sometimes detected strange energy emissions and moreover not reproducible: procedural errors no doubt, to be put in the same bag as the "memory of water" ... : Mrgreen:

(edited by ex-océano: BBCode correction 10/12/2007 - 20:46)
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Go back to "Innovations, inventions, patents and ideas for sustainable development"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 142 guests