Paxlovid: Kyoto University Publication Claims Ivermectin Is 50% More Effective

[giberpa]

KYOTO UNIVERSITY PUBLICATION CLAIMS IVERMECTIN IS 50% MORE EFFECTIVE THAN PFIZER MOLECULE, For prevention, zinc and vitamin D

https://pgibertie.com/2022/01/31/une-pu ... /#Paxlovid

https://www-reuters-com.translate.goog/ ... x_tr_hl=en

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05056883

More interesting this publication that no one will talk about

All promising drugs targeting the main protease would also be
be effective against this variant; however, ivermectin shows the strongest binding affinity

Leroux Arthur @LerouxArthur10 15 p.m. The 2018 Nobel Prize for Medicine, Pr Tasuku Honjo, explains that #ivermectin is effective on #COVID19 according to the literature, but that there is no serious trial because it does not is not profitable to invest in repositioned molecules. Remind you of someone? #Raoult

[Christophe]

Your subjects are interesting but please STOP writing the TITLES IN CAPS!!

I corrected it but I would not like to have to do it every time...

Merci!

Otherwise you can insert twitter (and facebook) links directly and they will be displayed in the forum

[pedrodelavega]

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

A Japanese study "corrected" by a press agency (Reuters), it's super serious and hyper scientific! Always the mega bullshit from the hyper stupid Végaz...

[pedrodelavega]

A Japanese study "corrected" by a press agency (Reuters), it's super serious and hyper scientific! Always the mega bullshit from the hyper stupid Végaz...

It is not the study that is corrected but the erroneous communication that Reuters had made...

[izentrop]

Oh yes ! ...again, "in vitro" is not "in vivo"...
It is not an enormity near giberpa who never responds to comments

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

A Japanese study "corrected" by a press agency (Reuters), it's super serious and hyper scientific! Always the mega bullshit from the hyper stupid Végaz...

It is not the study that is corrected but the erroneous communication that Reuters had made...

Reuters only corrects what it is told to correct. The independence of a press agency, don't mess around anyway...

@ Zombizy: Shut up.

[Christophe]

A Japanese study "corrected" by a press agency (Reuters), it's super serious and hyper scientific! Always the mega bullshit from the hyper stupid Végaz...

That's it…how it flies low…

Reuters has the scientific authority of Picsou Magazine!!

[pedrodelavega]

[GuyGadeboisTheBack]

And even when? If it works in vitro, that doesn't mean it doesn't work in vivo. Moreover, it works in vivo, so it is confirmed by this in vitro study. I understand that there are interests that put their power to work to drown the fish and more. Not you, Vegaz?