forums energies: society, ecology and clean technologies

Small survey:
(Christophe ... if you can format it so that the results are displayed progressively ... )

Between masks, gloves, respirators, hydro-alcoholic gels and other materials absent at the start of the crisis, and which are still slow to arrive in France, the declarations and oppositions to Professor Raoult, many French people are asking questions on the inconsistencies and paradoxes of the government's attitude and contradictory statements in this crisis.

Many health specialists also wonder about inexplicable dysfunctions and delays, and their real reasons ...

Hence this little survey to find out what the many econologists who express themselves on the forum !


On a scale of 1 to 10,
- the 1 being "I am sure NO",
- on the 10th, "YES, I'm sure of it",
- the 5th, "I don't know, I don't have an opinion",

what is your opinion on the following questions:

1. This Coronavirus crisis was so unpredictable and incredible that it explains the current dysfunctions in its management by the government

2. The dysfunctions in the management of the Coronavirus crisis are mainly due to the incompetence of our leaders

3. The dysfunctions in the management of the Coronavirus crisis are mainly due to the incompetence of experts and specialists on public health issues who advise the government

4. The contradictory declarations of the government show that our governors knowingly lied to us to hide their management errors

5. Several theories claim that this pandemic comes from a human error, namely a virus created in a medical laboratory which would have accidentally been found in nature

6. Several theories claim that this pandemic comes from a human manipulation, namely a virus created in a medical laboratory which would have been deliberately diffused in nature

7. Several theories claim that this pandemic could be a secret strategy to create fear in order to better control the world's populations ("conspiracy theory" and / or "shock strategy")

8. The opposition of government health officials to Professor Raoult is due to reasons of personal interest (links with pharmaceutical companies and lobbies) more than for reasons of protocols not respected by Professor Raoult

9. As our President Macron said, the deconfinement will indeed start from May 11th

10. After the crisis, things will not be as before, and great beneficial changes will take place at the economic and political level, it will be better after

11. After the crisis, things will not be as before, and great evil changes will take place at the economic and political level, it will be worse after

1 - 1
2 - 10
3 - 1
4 - 10
5 - 3 I am thinking of a sorting error in the waste. A wild animal would then have been contaminated in the trash. It's just an unlikely assumption.
6 - 1
7 - 1
8 - 5 (both: lobbies + protocols not respected)
9 - 5 we will see
10 and 11, I do not know how to answer as it is indicated: I think that we are going to have a very serious crisis, that it will change on the political side and that we will go towards a more resilient and perhaps more just model. it's going to be very bad in 2020-2021, then better then. So yes for the 2 questions but delayed in time.

My overall point of view is that it is the savings on the healthcare system and our extreme industrial dependence that are the 2 causes of this situation. Afterwards the politician manages as he can.
Instead of taking care of the regulatory size of the camembert or the size of the mandarin, the State would have done better to carry out audits with the industrialists to know if one could manufacture drugs and masks in France.

My answers :
1. 6
2. 7
3. 7
4. 8
5. 5
6. 3
7. 3
8. 8
9. 5
9. 5
10. 5
11. 5

Perhaps a 12.th and 13.th question should be added:
12. After the crisis things will return to the same level: nothing will change
13. This crisis has produced such an awakening and raising questions for people of all CSPs, that there will inevitably be changes, but impossible to say today which way it will go, better or worse.

So I add my notes for questions 12 and 13:
12. 7
13. 10

= 1 1
= 2 9
= 3 10
= 4 8
= 5 9
6 = 0 (because there is no proof of a "Will to harm" established as it is, without ruling out the hypothesis.
7 = 0 (because as it stands, there was no criminal investigation to establish it, without ruling out the hypothesis)
= 8 10
= 9 1
= 10 1
= 11 7
= 12 7
= 13 3

1. 1

2. 8

3. 8

4. 7

5 -It is possible

6. 1

7. 1

8. 9 - Because these are not the only reasons

9. 5

10. 4

11. 7

12. 3

13. 7

Nice initiative Greli! I have already changed the title!

I would answer a little later ... uh "from next May 11" wasn't that in 2020?

Christophe wrote:Nice initiative Greli! I have already changed the title!

And then at the end of the survey, we will ask a good statistician to give us statistics.
So what is a statistician ...

Wakeup call:
JOURNALIST: But basically what is the difference between a good statistician and a bad statistician?

ABC: Ah, I was waiting for this one! I was expecting him ...
No, but the bad statistician? Well, it's the guy who has a computer, sees a list, numbers, calculates ...

JOURNALIST: And the good statistician?

ABC: The good statistician? He's a guy, he has a computer, a computer, sees a list, figures, calculates ... but ... it's not the same thing: there's the right statistician, and there's the bad statistician ... There's the faker, and there's the non-faker. Well, you have to explain: You see: there's the wrong statistician: Y sees a list, figures: y calculates, y calculates. The good statistician: sees a list, figures there: calculates ... but he's a good statistician !!! You see? That's it ! We can not confuse them .... There's the wrong statistician: sees a list, figures, calculates there, that's for sure ... So there we recognize him all around! But the good statistician: sees a list, figures, calculates there, but ... he is a good statistician! Well, in all ways, these are stupid questions ...
health-pollution-prevention / resignation-of-dr-raoult-supporter-of-chloroquine-from-scientific-advice-covid19-t16370-1660.html # p397863

To bring this thread back up and everyone to participate ...

This is what the government did by taking advantage of the covid crisis:

Mea Culpa, I hadn't seen that the subject dated from April 2020 !!



So, do those who answered in the spring of 2020 have different answers today?

GuyGadeboisLeRetour wrote:

Christophe wrote:Nice initiative Greli! I have already changed the title!

And then at the end of the survey, we will ask a good statistician to give us statistics.
So what is a statistician ...

Wakeup call:
JOURNALIST: But basically what is the difference between a good statistician and a bad statistician?

ABC: Ah, I was waiting for this one! I was expecting him ...
No, but the bad statistician? Well, it's the guy who has a computer, sees a list, numbers, calculates ...

please don't attribute your own mental confusion to me ....