I maintain what I said. It is not because a molecule would be found everywhere in nature, or would not create addiction, that it would not be a drug. It is a drug when doses are taken artificially and gives rise to psychotropic effects.
Take for example the definition of Larousse:
"
Natural or synthetic psychotropic substance, generally harmful to health, likely to cause drug addiction, and consumed outside a medical prescription."
"harmful" preceded by "generally", or "drug addiction" preceded by "susceptible", tell us that these characters are not necessary to talk about drugs.
On the other hand, DMT is well defined as "powerful psychotropic substance", which meets the definition of a drug.
So watch the documentary in full before classifying guru those who intervene ...
Gurus, you have them in all categories. If being a scientist reduces the risk of being an illuminator, a believer, or a lowly political activist, he does not eliminate it, and you always find it to promote their hobby.
After we can understand that some countries (including France) the class by staggering: its large-scale use would upset society!
What is certain is that addiction aside, we will have the same risks as with other drugs. If you take it before driving, I doubt that you go very far. If the surgeon takes it before you open the knife on the operating table, not sure that you escape.
Shamans in South America use them frequently and their society is certainly healthier, humanly, than ours!
Yes, I had also learned about ayahuasca following the trip of a loved one in South America. This fashionable drug has still caused deaths, the damsels who offer the experience to tourists, not always having control of the product.
Their societies that would be healthier is a view of the mind. Men have the same cross everywhere. I do not see any health among the Aztecs who practiced human sacrifices, especially children. To believe in good primitives and other men of the soil in their rudimentary good societies is an intellectual devotion of the civilized obsessed with his little worries of wealth and who imagines a paradise elsewhere or past that never existed.
I honestly think that DMT should be used for certain therapeutic cases: for example, suicide bombers and all the other crazy people who want to die by doing as much harm as possible to others! And also some criminals or serial killers ...
The effect seems fugitive. I do not really see what he could do in the long run.
I would not be against marketing, or experience it personally out of curiosity. But we must still know what we are talking about: a product that alters the mind and has nothing to do with metaphysics as LSD. It even removes metaphysics and mysticism, since if it provides the same experiences as those of imminent death, it invalidates the explanation of the illuminated of a flirtation with the afterlife and discussions with their ancestors died.
).
