Dangerous alleys (Claude Allègre and his fads ...)

[chatelot16]

Hello

as recently as this morning allegre, true to himself, claimed
that there was no study on GMOs !!

bof, surely it is not ready for stupidity !!

especially since yesterday he took himself for madam sun by doing
Praise for nuclear power: predicting a significant portion
nuclear power generation ... and this gentleman
thinks he's a scientist !!

I almost answered on the stupidity of allegiance ... but not to rot the serious subject of GMOs I prefer to make another subject

I was really horrified to see him take himself for the only competent scientist "it's in the air" on 5

repeat many times that there was no scientist in the government

tell this kind of enormity very seriously:

photovoltaics will never be profitable due to the physical law of conservation of energy!

which is a real nonsense: photovoltaics work, profitability is only a question of comparing different cost prices: no physical law determines cost prices

he also claimed that geothermal energy allows neutral heating throughout France

the stupidity that too often journalists say on television makes me sad ... but when it is the one who pretends to be a real scientist and who despises others it is serious

he also reiterated that a new generation of nuclear power station would definitively solve the energy problem ... without saying precisely what he was thinking of ... but I can only think of the breeder which with the current physical law does not work ... unlike photovoltaics

there are many researchers who are looking for ways to go beyond the physical limits that prevent him from walking ... they may succeed one day but he is frankly too good to count on

so it's really lamentable to see a pseudo scientist criticize what works and that we can build without inconvenience to boast what will work one day maybe ... and which will be a disaster if we count on it and it never works ... or worse than that turns out to be too dangerous

[Christophe]

So I gave the title of this subject in the plural

[highfly-addict]

What mainly offends me is that our journalists are still inviting her ...

[chatelot16]

thank you I easily forget the plural for 2 or 3 but the plural is essential

another stupidity in the same program: he defended shale gas by comparing with the united states and forgetting the main difference! there it’s not shale gas, it’s mostly shale oil: we send detergent into the ground to unblock the oil and we pump it ... if we don't pump it quickly enough is not lost

where it is gas it is much more complicated: when we release the gas by chemical products we are never sure of recovering it entirely: there is the risk of letting go of it in the atmosphere more than in recovery

if the united states has large areas more or less desert and that they are not afraid of polluting them seriously for a lot of oil, they can do it (and they may regret it): with us it's too small the amount of gas to recover is anyway too low, and the pollution will be too serious

[chatelot16]

journalists invite everyone! it is not for journalists to say who is right ... especially during a broadcast that is live

when you see someone like that ridiculing yourself, you learn not to believe everything that is said even by people who seem serious

[Remundo]

lobbies or fads?

[highfly-addict]

journalists invite everyone! it is not for journalists to say who is right ... especially during a broadcast that is live

No, journalists don't invite everyone! They are often content to draw from a list of personalities which we know that they "go well" on the screen.
It is certainly not for journalists to say who is right, but it is they who issue the invitations and therefore, knowing the official speech of the guests, orient the meaning of the general message of the program.

when you see someone like that ridiculing yourself, you learn not to believe everything that is said even by people who seem serious

Ahem! He laughs at you as well as mine because we have elements to criticize his speech.
Alas, the sad sire can undoubtedly still pass for sensible near many of our ill-informed fellow citizens ...

@ Remundo: Lubies! The lobbies would do it much better than this tartuffe ....

[Christophe]

lobbies or fads?

Good remark because I hesitated between the 2 by editing the title (I added the () in addition to putting in the plural ...) ... so we will say her fads for lobbies ...

[Janic]

Hello
I attended the show too;
when Allègre emphasizes that there are no scientists (competent on shale gas) in the government, he is right! The rulers call on "specialists" on the subjects concerned, which underlines the incompetence of rulers in general. After the independence of these specialists, that's another aspect!
Otherwise after Allègre ... ment, I propose: allègr ... ories which also fits well!

[Obamot]

(I added the () in addition to putting in the plural ...

You can also remove the "c" from steak while you're at it (we write "steak")
https://www.econologie.com/forums/la-viande- ... 11525.html