Electromagnetic waves and pollution: general public health guide to understand

[Christophe]

I found a guide on electromagnetic waves and comprehensive and accessible health!.

It's quite public (quite rare in this area) and an update on the issue and fully to intox avoid the net can be read here and there (as disinformation on electromagnetic waves of fluorescent bulbs ... Hoax so widespread, that recently even a policeman, believed and asked us for information on the subject in private!).

This 40-page guide will answer all your questions about "electromagnetic or electrical pollution".

You should know that Belgium is more strictre than France in this area, including on permissible levels of mobile phones (even 21 V / m against 3 V / m for Belgium).

Extract:

Since April 3 2009, in Wallonia, a decree applies to fixed transmitting antennas with a capacity of over 4 W (9 5 paper). The decree limits the electromagnetic field 3 V / m per antenna (standard is identical for all RF)

Introduction:

Foreword

Every day we are in contact with electromagnetic fields. Besides the natural electromagnetic radiation, like sunlight and warmth, we are exposed to radiation and the fields of artificial origin, from power plants, electrical transmission,
television, radio, mobile telephony, etc. whose use is increasing.

This growth of "electromagnetic pollution" concerned more and more people and information regarding potential health consequences is highly sought. The offer of information about it can sometimes be misleading. Therefore, it is not easy to communicate on this issue.

The first obstacle is the complexity. The technologies, the human body and the interaction of the two elements are so complex that it is particularly difficult to provide information that covers all the necessary aspects.

The second obstacle is uncertainty. The public demands concrete answers to his questions, that neither science nor the authorities are sometimes able to give. He also wants certainty and absolute safety in daily life that we can not always give it. Evidenced for example risks related to traffic, medical procedures, environment, food.

The authorities are taking measures to protect the population risk. However, the precautionary principle is too often interpreted simplistically as a guarantee absolute protection.

The third obstacle is the lack of unanimity. Indeed, public perceptions and interpretations of contradictory opinions. Often it is not possible to verify the reliability and expertise of one or another expert. also often preferred simplistic assertions, linear and therefore better understandable, but not always correct. Yet caution is needed when it comes to interpreting such messages: the results of scientific research must be placed in context.
This brochure provides a picture of this complex issue in the most objective and consistent as possible. Many scientists and employees of federal, regional and community governments have brought their stone to the building.

I would like to thank them here.
The Minister of Public Health

Download here: guide on standards and electromagnetic pollution

https://www.econologie.com/telechargeme ... mes-sante/

or http://www.health.belgium.be/eportal (Type waves in the search engine).

I can not help but to capture the page that discusses the bulbs, extract the FAQ page of the .pdf 24



Based on this, I can not do anything for the morons who still believe the hoax regarding EM waves of fluorescent bulbs, disinformation relayed by me (r) slides without verifying the scientific veracity !! It is shameful.

Edit: see also this story of the early years 2000 https://www.econologie.com/telechargeme ... es-ou-gsm/

[dedeleco]

Christophe information via useful to read and decode or comment:
1) UV:
to 20cm (desktop or bedside lamp) is approaching the limits damage to her skin and take risks, because the fluorescent white coating keeps all UV.
A 1 meter, dose (1m / 20cm) squared = 5 5x25 times lower but not totally negligible !! (If with lower 1000fois or to root = 1000 31 20 cm time either 6m, a bit far to read !!!!)
So mistrust have not less than 1 to 2m !!

2) Electromagnetic:
the risk of leukemia for children rises to more than 0,3 microteslas either Gauss (old habit) 3 / 1000iéme Gauss is not heavy (as heard 50herz) !!
Indeed the Earth's magnetic field is much stronger 0,5gauss or 500microteslas but fixed for months !!
Or an ordinary yarn is a field in Gauss as the current in amperes I divided by the distance in cm (with factor 2pi / 10) and therefore 2,2KW with 10 A to 1m gives a field 0,06Gauss = 6 microtesla, 20 times more than this 0,3 value !!
However must be balanced by the fact that the son go and close current return strongly cancel this field (be unlike 2 son).
Moreover, almost a transformer iron values ​​are much stronger.
So do not put your head for a long time (days) close to son (electric blanket) or from a transformer or motor !!
Otherwise, grandfather, I am still alive to 1mètre !!
Finally in trains, with the catenary wire with 100 to 1000A, engines with very high intensity and a lot of iron in addition, are not far under the floor and is undergoing quite strong fields, which lead to ask questions about the disease and railway EDF agent on lines, but there are other pollutants like asbestos train brake before.

[dedeleco]

info:
The trees do not resist wifi especially their bark:

Dutch study Suggests Wi-Fi Possibly harmful to trees
http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-11-dut ... trees.html

[Christophe]

I answered here: https://www.econologie.com/forums/post184686.html#184686
but it would be nice to continue in the about wifi and health here : https://www.econologie.com/forums/wi-fi-onde ... t6915.html

ps: anti wifi solution network cables

[Christophe]

I put the report in the site's downloads:
https://www.econologie.com/guide-champs- ... -4313.html

https://www.econologie.com/downloads.html

[Did67]

, Recently, same gendarme believed.

Just in passing, what were you insinuating, by that, by this "same"?

- The immense scientific culture of the gendarmes who are experts in everything ??

- Their very high sensitivity (electromagnetic waves I mean) ??


But I admit, that the same sentence with "recently, even a welder, believed in" it was not the same! Or with "recently, even a conductor believed in" ???

[Christophe]

A policeman represents the law, the authority, the state, rigor ... not to tell the truth, justice ...

We can therefore expect them to verify, more than the "others", the information and sources of intoxes that run on the net ...

As a state representative, I think they have the duty to verify not to spread disinformation ...

But I'm wrong maybe?

[dedeleco]

With this gendarme system throughout and writings, one ends as in China, without the freedom to tell the truth about the attacks on democracy and freedom of opinion !!!

So what all the excesses of the mafia state are possible often with impunity, since the state of certain mafias You censorship as soon as we begin to denounce effective proof !!
So do not ask too much censorship, as it loses its freedom forever !!
Rather ask sites that inform on the evidence of scam or false claims with evidence !!

On electromagnetic waves well reported on the current situation, Accurate benchmarks to know, but hardly speaks of our quasi ignorance of the biological effects at low levels, certainly very complex, can be both beneficial and harmful long-term, with a range of frequencies and structure of the electromagnetic spectrum near infinite.
As nothing having on biological effects, scientists and technicians deny, argue that it is safe !!
It's just like asbestos dust at high doses kills without discussion (as waves that heat with free antennas on the roof under 500KW or 499 microwave ovens open roof freely !! !) And during 100 years the assertion that very little, with some asbestos fibers per liter of air were safe for us in the buildings denying the possibility of cancers occurring after 30 years of exposure only !!
Asbestos has been banned because it was typical and cancer so rare that it was possible to scientifically prove that it was the asbestos low dose !!
If the cancer had not existed, but was only the same cancers of the population, it would have been impossible to prove and asbestos continue to be used anywhere with low exposure, without being aware of the increasing number of cancers associated with asbestos, as embedded in the many other causes of our environment, herbicides, pesticides, chemical traces everywhere, radiations, etc ... !!!!

The waves might like asbestos cause effects at very low doses and almost invisible long term !!!

This report does not mention the basic logic aberration that electromagnetic radio waves and microwaves, are the only physical phenomenon where the apparent sensitivity of living beings is much smaller than our technical devices by factors of millions to billions as radios and mobile phones !!!
Life uses with huge sensitivities other physical phenomena: odors, hormones and chemistry: the molecule, the sound moving a atomic distance view almost the photon, but, surprisingly, it seems, does not use radio waves and microwaves with the max sensitivity, so we believe and affirm that the only danger comes by overheating at very high dose

This aberration is never highlighted, then it is proof of our total ignorance on the biological effects of these waves at low doses, too complex both beneficial and dangerous, to be detected easily with our current knowledge (only scattered clues) !!
It's just like the danger of asbestos low dose denied for a century !!!!!

So for the waves, it is good to reduce exposure by a factor 1000 and below the official level !!
Even more if it is as dangerous asbestos in a million below the dose that kills quickly (found around 1900 weaving like cotton in a cloud of asbestos dust !!)

[Christophe]

Waw what "proof" ...



We're more serious than that here you know...

Please don't troll...you've done enough bad enough as it is!


I'm still waiting for studies on the health impact of fluoluminescents tubes are used Deplus over 80 years. Obviously you do not have one.

The subject is closed.

[nlc]

Hmmm, me is the risk associated with the high voltage line that calls me ...
Our little guy 16 months and it really lives not far from a line THT