Yeah, so ...
Are the sequences bogus?
The presenter adds, saying that he had declared going back on the metro, when it is not in the video.
explanations: he has to make a difference between private and public life in which he has a company car, which he uses, so as not to make a driver unemployed, and he makes him work from time to time, to justify his salary , and not participate in a lazy republic.
Otherwise, he may be going to République, by bike. He broke or derailed his chain, burned a red light, and had his bicycle confiscated. He telephoned his manager, who got back in a limousine, had time to mop his sweat, arrived in front of the room, made his statement, then left by metro, logically ... Good, but he would have spoken in the interview, because he did not seem well inspired ... Surely the emotions.
Finally everything is explained!