http://videos.tf1.fr/infos/media/jt/0,, ... tion-.html
Compact fluorescent bulbs would create electromagnetic fields between 0 and 30cm and especially on ignition, which could lead to headaches, difficulty sleeping well, etc.
Christophe, you will have to propose a measurer of electromagnetic fields in the shop because it is really relevant. The standard is 28 volts / meter.
Edit by Christophe: all this is intoxication because the clever little ones who laid this "scoop" (thank you journalists for relaying the intoxication) have forgot to know that the dangerousness of a field in V / m was related to its frequency! But the frequency of GSM is much higher (2.5 Ghz) than those of fluorescent bulbs (50Hz or 100Hz). To know more: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/electr_e ... rec519.pdf or mirror link: https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... AxM93H.pdf
If danger was there: where are the health studies? For mobile phones and asbestos, there are dozens. Fluorescent tubes have been used for more than 80 years.
Christophe wrote:Copy pasted from another subject:north wrote:Hello everybody
Here is the link where he talks about this dangerousness, because as for the mobile phones, it is now proven.
1) It has nothing to do with the subject of the profitability of a fluo so if you want to talk about the waves do it here:
Compact fluorescent and electromagnetic waves
2) I took a look and nothing that this reflects their lack of knowledge of technology, this statement is simply anything, what overconsumption? That of the strater?
These guys do not know what a joule is to say this ... Comparing a "short duration" with "One hour" already proves their blatant lack of scientifism ... If their afformation was true, the current peaks at the ignition would be very important ... Their assertion is therefore pitiful ... no it's laughable !!
3) By the way I hope you know that the French standard for GSM is still 28 V / m ... EVERYWHERE ... then we compare this value with the 9V / m measured at 0.3 m of a neon bulb to show than their accusations are simply fabulous and completely without comparative judgment.
Measure the field of your microwave in operation "just to see" ... I did it here: https://www.econologie.com/shop/detecteu ... p-143.html
4) LEDs instead of fluo? A sweet dream now.
I think that the author has never even bought a led bulb and measured its luminous efficiency EFFECTIVES to affirm this... Concerning the 100 000h of life it is simply a misleading assertion concerning because in the current state 99% of led light bulbs sold cramera widely before the 100 000h for the reasons evoked on this subject in particular: https://www.econologie.com/forums/eclairage-led-t4293.html
A led bulb to 22 € after about ten hours:
5) Where are the studies concerning harmful luminescent tubes? It's been 80 years that we use ... The GSM have already done more damage in 10 years ...
Conclusion: thank you for stopping to believe anything and especially find out before you really know the problem before relaying statements from people who do not master a subject... because it can even be dangerous of such behaviors ...
Edit November 2010:
Christophe wrote:The excerpt from a subsequent federal guide definitely closes this topic or I should say this intox.
Guide to 40 pages to download here: guide on electromagnetic pollution, standards, waves and health
So I do not want to hear about this poisoning here anymore. For the real scientific debate, we continue here: https://www.econologie.com/forums/ondes-elec ... 10188.html