Seizes chance for tropical forests

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
recyclinage
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1596
Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
Location: artist land

Seizes chance for tropical forests




by recyclinage » 12/12/09, 10:43

Combating deforestation is one of the means available to States to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This mechanism, called REDD, is under discussion at the Copenhagen summit. Once again, it brings rich countries and developing countries face to face.

Image of the Amazon basin obtained by CLASlite: in pink and blue the deforested areas, in green the intact forest.

Image of the Amazon basin obtained by CLASlite: in pink and blue the deforested areas, in green the intact forest. (Courtesy Greg Asner / CLASlite)
The states gathered for the Copenhagen summit are talking big money, it is inevitable. The fight against global warming must be financed, in particular aid given to poor or developing countries which are very vulnerable to climate change. Preserving forests is one of the major challenges of this global cooperation.

It has been discussed for several years within the framework of the REDD system, a very practical acronym which sums up a long title: "Reducing emissions linked to deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries".

CO2 emissions from the destruction of tropical forests represent 12 to 20% of annual global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Cutting down trees and modifying soils release large amounts of CO2 stored by these forests. Not to mention that deforestation is reducing the extent of one of the main natural carbon sinks on the planet. Brazil, Indonesia (which has the most alarming rate of deforestation today) and the Congo are the first to be affected by REDD.

This scheme can be financed in two ways: either by market mechanisms, countries that protect their forests selling emission credits on an international carbon market. Either by government funds - there are already some that finance projects in the Amazon or Indonesia.

The market system can have perverse effects: first, that of allowing polluters to continue emitting GHGs while it is important to quickly reduce emissions (read 2020 pivotal year, etc.). It also risks transforming forests into new 'green gold', coveted by investors, to the detriment of the populations who live in these forests without destroying it. British researcher Simon Lewis (University of Leeds) recently wrote in the journal Nature that tropical forest dwellers should be beneficiaries of at least 50% of REDD funding, in order to maintain their livelihoods and avoid a new humanitarian crisis.

In addition to the question of financing this scheme for protecting the tropical forest, there is the problem of its objectives. For the time being, developing countries are reluctant to face the quantified constraints.

The effectiveness of REDD will also depend on the technologies put in place to monitor and quantify deforestation. This forest monitoring has already started in the Amazon basin in Brazil. By combining the freely available satellite images with analysis methods developed by researchers from the Carnegie Institution (California, USA), the CLASlite system reveals the regions of the Amazon basin intact and those that are degraded. According to its promoters, five countries in the Andes-Amazon region have adopted this system and its use should expand.

Cécile Dumas
Sciences-et-avenir.com
11/12/09


http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/actualit ... cales.html
0 x
recyclinage
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 1596
Registration: 06/08/07, 19:21
Location: artist land




by recyclinage » 14/12/09, 12:24

Copenhagen, the proposal to save the world's tropical forests has suffered a setback. The text on climate change, under negotiation in Copenhagen, revised downwards with regard to the deforestation of tropical forests, due to lack of quantified funding.

In the context of the Copenhagen climate summit, it is worth noting the step back in negotiations to save tropical forests from deforestation, the UN said.



Indeed, a proposal to save the world's tropical forests suffered a serious setback on Sunday when negotiators for the UN climate talks shelved proposals for faster action on the problem of deforestation tropical forests due to the fact that rich countries are not ready to finance these measures.



However, deforestation of trees in tropical forests, by burning or cutting to clear land for the establishment of plantations or livestock farms, accounts for about 20% of global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. It is the total amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) represented by the combined emissions of all cars, trucks, trains, planes and ships worldwide.



Copenhagen, the proposal to save the world's tropical forests has suffered a setback The text on climate change, being negotiated in Copenhagen, revised downwards regarding the deforestation of tropical forests, due to lack of quantified funding.



Thus, the UN considers that an agreement on deforestation is a key element of an enlarged pact on climate change, a climate pact being negotiated in Copenhagen (COP 15).



Sunday, the costed proposal to reduce deforestation by 50% by 2020, was removed from the Copenhagen climate pact in negotiation until next Friday. This document, which is to lead to the Copenhagen climate pact, now only mentions funding without specifying the sums that would be allocated to the forty or so developing countries in Latin America, Asia and Africa which are affected by deforestation. tropical forests.



Gabriel Antonio La Vina, chief UN negotiator in the forest talks and author of the latest project, downplayed these refusals and said it was a compromise between those who demanded hard targets and those who didn't want it.



Environmentalists earlier this month hailed the forest negotiations as one of the fastest growing areas for trade, and some even suggested that these negotiations could serve as a catalyst for reaching a broader agreement here. Copenhagen.



But environmentalists will ultimately also be the victims of quarrels between rich and poor nations, those quarrels that slow the chances of reaching an enlarged climate pact in Copenhagen. At this time, there are still no precise precise quantified objectives on the financing of adaptation to climate change or on objectives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the climate pact in negotiation course.


http://www.actualites-news-environnemen ... evers.html
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 228 guests