Liberalism, right? The USA teaches lessons!

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars

Liberalism, right? The USA teaches lessons!




by martien007 » 08/09/08, 16:08

The US has taught the capitalist world lessons so that all businesses are PRIVATE, starting with the banks.

And what we see in times of crisis, the US State comes to the aid of private companies in difficulty ................ I'm fed up.

Do what I say but especially not what I do:

WASHINGTON (AFP) - 08/09/08 15: 30USA: supervision of mortgage refinancing organizations Freddie and Fannie

The United States Treasury announced on Sunday that the mortgage refinancing agencies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae will be placed under government supervision, while they restructure their finances, which have been damaged by the credit and real estate crisis.

The plan provides that the federal government will be able to inject up to $ 100 billion into each of these companies to help them accomplish their mission..

Although it is likely that these envelopes will not be fully consumed, the rescue of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac thus promises to be one of the most costly government bailouts of private companies ever conducted in the history of global finance.

The importance of the sum is intended to show "the strong commitment" of the State to the creditors and investors in securities of two institutions, defended Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, whose party is a priori hostile to the rescue of private companies by the state.

At a press conference, Paulson said the decision was made after "a very thorough analysis of the current financial situation" of the two companies.

At the beginning of the summer, the federal state had already provided support to the two companies. Essentially verbal support, which Mr. Paulson compared to a bazooka, which is shown but not used. However, according to the press, a thorough examination of the accounts of Freddie Mac, and to a lesser extent, Fannie Mae, revealed accounting irregularities and a more precarious financial situation than previously estimated.

Mr. Paulson considered that the two companies, of private status but exercising public service missions, now presented a risk to the soundness of the financial system, which it was up to the federal state to correct, because of the "ambiguities" of their operation that he has long tolerated.

Within the limit of $ 100 billion set for each of them, the Treasury will provide new capital to the two institutions, as and when, according to their needs. This formula "is the most effective way to avoid a systemic risk and contains provisions to protect the taxpayer" in the event of bankruptcy of the two companies.

The Treasury will thus have priority in the event of liquidation. He will also immediately receive $ 1 billion in preferred securities of the two companies, offering a high yield of 10% per year, and "warrants" which will allow him to claim up to 79,9% of their share capital.

As already announced in July, the two companies will be able to refinance themselves with the central bank, like the commercial banks.

The respective departments of the two companies have been ousted and their management will now be ensured by officers appointed by the regulator.

By playing on their ability to refinance cheaply, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy from the banks the home loans they have granted to individuals and then resell them to institutional investors. Banks thus free up liquidity which enables them to make new loans, thereby contributing to the dynamism of the real estate market.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own or guarantee more than $ 5.000 billion in mortgage-backed securities, more than 40% of the outstanding mortgage loan in the United States.
Their bankruptcy would therefore have presented an "unacceptable risk" for the country's economy, explained President George W. Bush, assuring that the placing under supervision of the two institutions was not to be prolonged.

The Director General of the International Fund Dominique Strauss-Kahn welcomed a decision that should calm the financial markets.

Mr. Paulson's plan provides for a huge slimming program for the two companies, which will have to reduce the size of their balance sheets by 10% per year from December 31, 2009. Their loans and their bond portfolio, which should not not exceed 850 billion dollars on this date, will therefore have to fall by 10% per year, to return to 250 billion dollars.

During the reform of the two companies, the Treasury will buy part of the mortgage-backed securities that they issue to raise new funds. The Treasury expects an easing on the mortgage credit market, and in turn, a revival of the real estate market.

The importance of this buyback program, which will end at the end of December 2009, will be dictated "by developments in the capital and real estate markets".

Despite the trusteeship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which practically doubles the debt of the United States, the rating agencies Standard & Poor's and Fitch Ratings have maintained the "AAA" rating (the best possible) granted to the world's leading economic power..


And here are the corrupt rating agencies that rate AAA the USA when they are the most indebted in the World.

Source: Orange internet info.
0 x
avygel
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 13
Registration: 02/09/08, 09:58




by avygel » 08/09/08, 16:17

Alalala, the worst part is that everything happens more and more often.

I do not think that the trusteeship of the State is a bad thing for the pillar companies of a country but coming from the United States which preach liberalism for 40 years and which let rot those who fail, it is still the hospital that doesn't care about charity.

Anyway, better worth it, sooner than seeing poor American households ruined when they have nothing to do with it, but I think it's just going backwards to jump better, and when its arrives, everyone will feel it pass (america and europe)

Image
0 x
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars




by martien007 » 08/09/08, 16:18

An intruder changed my title :!: but it's better like that.
0 x
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars




by martien007 » 08/09/08, 16:27

avygel wrote:Alalala, the worst part is that everything happens more and more often.

I do not think that the trusteeship of the State is a bad thing for the pillar companies of a country but coming from the United States which preach liberalism for 40 years and which let rot those who fail, it is still the hospital that doesn't care about charity.

Anyway, better worth it, sooner than seeing poor American households ruined when they have nothing to do with it, but I think it's just going backwards to jump better, and when its arrives, everyone will feel it pass (america and europe)

Image


But this does not prevent small households who have not been able to reimburse from being evicted! on the other hand, it allows these rotten bankers, who loaned hard and badly with variable rates when rates were at their lowest in the USA, to save themselves from bankruptcy when they should look for the culprits of these "crazy" loans which have thrown thousands of people into debt.
Well it is clear that a lot of people do not know how to count and they get "bogged down" by getting into excessive debt, but we have done so much cramming to CONSUME at all costs that many people cannot live on they don't consume.
0 x
avygel
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 13
Registration: 02/09/08, 09:58




by avygel » 08/09/08, 16:54

It's true, but frankly I don't understand how we can
go into so much debt for so long.
The brainwashing had to be intensive to achieve this result.

Image
0 x
martien007
I posted 500 messages!
I posted 500 messages!
posts: 565
Registration: 25/03/08, 00:28
Location: planet Mars




by martien007 » 08/09/08, 17:02

avygel wrote:It's true, but frankly I don't understand how we can
go into so much debt for so long.
The brainwashing had to be intensive to achieve this result.

Image


You know that there are (were?) Loans for the purchase of real estate over 40 or even 50 years in England and Spain !!! in other words: borrow and have your descendants reimbursed : Lol:
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 148 guests