Smoke screen on chemical pollution

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
Lukas Stella
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 15/11/06, 20:51

Smoke screen on chemical pollution




by Lukas Stella » 16/11/06, 20:05

PROHIBITED EVERYWHERE, RESPONSIBILITY NOWHERE

"Chemical pollution is a serious threat to children and to human survival.
Our health, that of our children and that of future generations being at risk,
it is the human species that is itself in danger."

Extract from L'Appel de Paris, signed by several hundred international scientists, all the Councils of the Order of Physicians of the 25 member countries of the European Union...

Insecurity is not where we would like us to believe. It no longer has borders, it is everywhere, diffuse and without appearance. If they cannot be seen, chemical, radioactive and electromagnetic pollution, nevertheless kill a little more every day. In their blind race, a few fanatics of profits at any price, hysterical about stock market trading and billions to be usurped as soon as possible, cheerfully eject their toxic waste, contaminating all that remains of life on earth.

Cancers are always the fruits of combinations of multiple causes due to the environment. Breast, prostate, testicular or brain cancers, melanomas and lymphomas have increased rapidly in recent years. The list of various causes is long, and all kinds of agents suspected of being carcinogens have not yet been studied... How many deaths with cancer? Soon one out of two like in the United States?
While it is recognized today that the human species is seriously contaminated and effectively threatened by pollution, chemical or otherwise, politicians and journalists, totally irresponsible but above all accomplices, denounce cigarette smokers, hiding by this screen of smoke the dangerous destruction of life on our planet. And they believe that by excluding, blaming and dirtying part of the population, they will be able to appear cleaner. Prohibition has always favored consumption, the mafias rejoice in it.
Prohibited everywhere, responsibility nowhere!

The polluters, these harmful assassins, operate freely with the help of the States. What will these mafiosi apprentices who manage the successive governances of the abominable financial dictatorship do? They have long since proven their suicidal irresponsibility.
Wait what, the disappearance of fish soon? And after that, whose turn is it?... How many cataclysms, catastrophes, wars, suicides, sick people, ruined lives...

Today it is prudent not to choose to become an accomplice of an inhuman society, for which life has value only in the profit that can be drawn from its chronic destruction, whether physical, biological or psychological.
We no longer have a choice, our survival depends on it.

Lukas Stella
http://inventin.lautre.net
0 x
User avatar
gegyx
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 6980
Registration: 21/01/05, 11:59
x 2905




by gegyx » 16/11/06, 23:18

Alright, all the way!
The responsibilities of those responsible are behind their smokescreens.
When I say to an elected official, that his decisions are highly likely to harm the health of his fellow citizens, because studies by isolated researchers show some bizarre things.
And that upon reading these reports, the least you could do is apply the “precautionary principle”. And that he answers that he trusts the majority opinion of the specialists in the question, who declare that no interaction seems established. He opens the umbrella to have a good conscience, and still applies the wrong things!
This pisses me off, and I tell him that that very day, I informed him of a serious, ignored problem; if now, knowingly, he does not think about it a little by himself, and persists, he will be personally responsible for the illnesses or deaths caused by these decisions. Don't say, we didn't know, we weren't informed at the time...
In ten years, in fifteen years, he will no longer be elected, but would be liable to go before the courts! No but !
: Evil:
0 x

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : gegyx and 159 guests