What Nicolas Hulot wrong! Personal opinion
published: 08/11/06, 10:09
Following me (r) diatic hype about Hulot and his interview at the FR2 news conference last night, I'd like to say a few words about his policy.
A) I AGREE WITH HIM:
1) The environment goes beyond a left-right divide
2) It is necessary to act quickly and efficiently
3) Revalorization of agriculture, handicrafts
4) Establishment of major awareness campaigns (we did not wait for it ...)
B) I DO NOT AGREE WITH HIM:
1) Talking financial efforts to equip in less energievore materials Shock me deeply. In an econological society the question would not even arise: the equipment would be installed systematically.
2) Defend the subsidies to the equipment of the same materials it is the possibility of guaranteeing overcharging of prices and especially of controlling the market's growth (we grant who and what we WANT WELL subsidize ...) ...
The Chinese EnR material will not be slow to land in Europe (1kW wind turbine 2-3000 € ...) nobody (official) will speak ... We bet?
3) FINALLY AND ESPECIALLY: all his speeches and actions only concern the (bad) polluters of particular. They are the only ones who have to make an effort precisely ... total impunity for industrialists...
The fight must be on 2 fronts: individuals use industrial products mainly ...
Finally he wants to make France an example. Very well.
But he forgot to say that we are years behind our European neighbors (on almost all areas except its advantage some of the CO2 through nuclear): at best we will be able to bring it back to level ... We will probably NEVER an example ...
A) I AGREE WITH HIM:
1) The environment goes beyond a left-right divide
2) It is necessary to act quickly and efficiently
3) Revalorization of agriculture, handicrafts
4) Establishment of major awareness campaigns (we did not wait for it ...)
B) I DO NOT AGREE WITH HIM:
1) Talking financial efforts to equip in less energievore materials Shock me deeply. In an econological society the question would not even arise: the equipment would be installed systematically.
2) Defend the subsidies to the equipment of the same materials it is the possibility of guaranteeing overcharging of prices and especially of controlling the market's growth (we grant who and what we WANT WELL subsidize ...) ...
The Chinese EnR material will not be slow to land in Europe (1kW wind turbine 2-3000 € ...) nobody (official) will speak ... We bet?
3) FINALLY AND ESPECIALLY: all his speeches and actions only concern the (bad) polluters of particular. They are the only ones who have to make an effort precisely ... total impunity for industrialists...
The fight must be on 2 fronts: individuals use industrial products mainly ...
Finally he wants to make France an example. Very well.
But he forgot to say that we are years behind our European neighbors (on almost all areas except its advantage some of the CO2 through nuclear): at best we will be able to bring it back to level ... We will probably NEVER an example ...