The day globalization stopped

Books, television programs, films, magazines or music to share, counselor to discover ... Talk to news affecting in any way the econology, environment, energy, society, consumption (new laws or standards) ...
User avatar
democrate
I learn econologic
I learn econologic
posts: 11
Registration: 04/03/06, 17:58
Location: FRANCE, Aquitaine

The day globalization stopped




by democrate » 06/05/06, 19:55

The day when globalization stopped was the day when oil ran out. Oil has almost disappeared and transport costs have become so prohibitive that global multinationals preferred to relocate their productions to the countries that had seen them disappear because of too expensive production costs. The results of this globalization was that countries like Africa and others remained as poor and even poorer due to their impossibility of adapting to this world economic war. Many industrialized countries had lost their industries and had been unable to adapt and were gradually sinking into poverty. The only winner was China, which has become a world superpower but still not a democracy ..... What a waste!
Some people will tell me that there are alternative energies but the problem is that they will never be able to completely replace oil and in any case never in the air transport sector. Unless the anti-gravity propulsion, even teleportation are invented. But this is all science fiction! While the oil shortage in 40 to 50 years is a reality.
In short, our decision-makers should think about this now.
0 x
User avatar
jean63
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2332
Registration: 15/12/05, 08:50
Location: Auvergne
x 4

Re: The day when globalization stopped




by jean63 » 06/05/06, 20:57

democrate wrote:The day when globalization stopped was the day when oil ran out. Oil has almost disappeared and transport costs have become so prohibitive that global multinationals preferred to relocate their productions to the countries that had seen them disappear because of too expensive production costs. The results of this globalization was that countries like Africa and others remained as poor and even poorer due to their impossibility of adapting to this world economic war. Many industrialized countries had lost their industries and had been unable to adapt and were gradually sinking into poverty. The only winner was China, which has become a world superpower but still not a democracy ..... What a waste!
Some people will tell me that there are alternative energies but the problem is that they will never be able to completely replace oil and in any case never in the air transport sector. Unless the anti-gravity propulsion, even teleportation are invented. But this is all science fiction! While the oil shortage in 40 to 50 years is a reality.
In short, our decision-makers should think about this now.


2030 (maybe well before) : Africa has no more resources: metals, petroleum, rubber, (plundered by the multinationals during the decades which have just passed), it has only the sun to produce energy, water in its large rivers not polluted by industrial sites and it is perhaps not the least good assets to survive because they know how to irrigate and cultivate their lands now. The so-called civilized world now wants to go and live in Africa ..... In China, the population has aged a lot (no renewal: 1 child maximum per household) and everything is polluted by the factories that have produced everything for the past few decades .... more soon ... BUT in the meantime a dramatic global EVENT has turned all forecasts upside down: Iran has refused to comply with the requirements of the UN (or rather the USA + UK) ... .so they struck, which triggered a chain reaction of the countries in disagreement (China, Russia) which tapped on the USA and the UK .... and France in all that? well it is excluded from the permanent members of the UN for its ambiguous positions and its relatively weak power in old Europe. Anyway there is a huge level of radioactivity in many regions and cancers explode with all the horrors that come with it.

One can imagine a lot of possibilities but this 21st century does not look very good, to say the least; perhaps the happiest are those who profit the most and .... after me the flood ....
0 x
Only when he has brought down the last tree, the last river contaminated, the last fish caught that man will realize that money is not edible (Indian MOHAWK).
tom29
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 23/06/06, 00:02




by tom29 » 23/06/06, 00:14

Bonsoir a tous

30 to 40 years of petroleum !!! It is false knowledge.
Indeed with constant consumption we have about 40 years of oil left, but our political policies and other industrialists forget one very important thing (voluntarily or not). It is that a beautiful there will be a Peak of petroleum production, that is to say that we will not be able to increase our production any more and that from this moment it will only decrease.

According to the ASPO the Pic would be for 2010 with a margin of safety of 5 years (in front as in back).

then it is not within 30 to 40 years that we should expect a change but rather within 5 to 10 years being very reasonable!

For more information :


Le Pic pour les non-inicies:

http://wolf.readinglitho.co.uk/francais/


Oleocene:

http://www.oleocene.org/

http://www.oleocene.org/phpBB2/ (FORUM)


ASPO:

http://aspofrance.org/



Good reading
0 x
User avatar
jean63
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 2332
Registration: 15/12/05, 08:50
Location: Auvergne
x 4




by jean63 » 23/06/06, 01:21

Thank you for all these sites ........ but disturbing at the same time. : Evil:
0 x
Only when he has brought down the last tree, the last river contaminated, the last fish caught that man will realize that money is not edible (Indian MOHAWK).
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79114
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 23/06/06, 09:23

Note a little off topic but not that much: it is not by voting Sarkozy that we will stop globalization ... his liberal-socialist speech (which rhymes with National Socialist?) Of yesterday makes me think (in the strategy of the widest possible population and not in the background of discreetness) to the speeches of the years 20-30 in Germany .... less racism.

Millions of French people are going to be tricked into this game ... on the other hand what are the serious alternatives?
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79114
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 23/06/06, 09:32



All these sites were already in the directory: https://www.econologie.com/annuaire/

Now Aspo works mainly with former oil tankers (who are buying up a conscience?) And am convinced that there are still far more than 20 to 40 years of reserves. I trust the oil companies and their billions to find solutions (we are all flies nearby) ... When they will allow them to earn more money than with oil but not before ...

The hubert peak does not mean the end of oil but just the "beginning of its end" .... and prices constantly increasing. SO WHAT ?
It is not the econologists who will complain about the high price of fossil resources ... Quite the contrary! All this is favorable to the emergence of alternative technologies!
0 x
tom29
I discovered econologic
I discovered econologic
posts: 4
Registration: 23/06/06, 00:02




by tom29 » 24/06/06, 03:43

Bonsoir

the Pic is not the end of petroleum, that's what I said. We certainly have more than 40 years of oil left, besides there will always be a little left that we will never extract because it will never be profitable.

The problem is the price, and you should know that in a world where energy is expensive it is more difficult to grow. And knowing that it will be much more expensive in a few years we will be called to decrease. To the energy challenge is added the "food" challenge, feeding the 6 billion people (which is already difficult today) with less and less intensive agriculture. There will also be the environmental challenge to be met, to engage in the path of clean energies, because if we start to use coal massively I do not give much of our skin by 2050 ...

when to the geologists of the ASPO I do not think that they redeem a conscience, they did nothing but become aware !!!

par tankers and their billions can never replace oil in its entirety, which does not mean that we will not adapt to change. It will be necessary to make "sacrifices", to question our way of life.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Media & News: TV shows, reports, books, news ..."

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 173 guests