forums energies: society, ecology and clean technologies

After excellent videos on vaccines: A complete change on the current vision of cancer. This reminds Did showing that the current mode of cultivation with plowing, compost, treatment of plant diseases are largely due to a poor understanding of biological mechanisms. And so the most that bio being valid in this area too!

https://lexpansion.lexpress.fr/high-tec ... 61661.html

https://lexpansion.lexpress.fr/high-tec ... 61661.html

how many people who believed in unconventional methods die of cancer because of it? No one seems to [*] and how many who have believed in conventional methods are dying of cancer? One in two! OUAHHHH! On which side is naivety? An affected person therefore has the choice of 50% risk of passing through or else taking another risk that is unlikely to be greater since vegetable juices, fruits, (assuming they are useless) do not present any pathological risk. And finally, those who dare something else are already at the end of life and have nothing to lose because conventional medicine has already condemned them.
As for Primum Non Nocere, apart from giving some explanations on the pathology, it offers no solution other than school medicine and its 50% chess. which is hardly reassuring!

[*] "They tried the juices instead. Fortunately, so far we haven't heard of any dramatic cases." says this article.
The disease is a juicy business whose medical profession is regal despite its many failures to the key, but are they not held by c .... by the biggest poisoners in the world, namely chemistry in all its forms.

Especially since the explanations of Mr. Casasnovas are very convincing ...

Especially since the explanations of Mr. Casasnovas are very convincing ...

I do not think that explanations, as convincing as they seem, are important.
Did, who also comes out of the box, is also convincing, but it remains only speech if there is no practice that alone will see if this or that argument is valid in culture as well as in health.
But all too often, those who challenge are also those who do not practice and therefore their speech loses all credibility.

Frankly, it's not very nice for Didier to draw a parallel between him and Mr. Casasnovas. Didier often repeats that he does not want to be a guru and there you compare him to a potential guru.

Frankly, it's not very nice for Didier to draw a parallel between him and Mr. Casasnovas. Didier often repeats that he does not want to be a guru.

if you followed the speeches of this Casasnovas, he too affirms not to have to be taken at his word, but to verify by practice and experience the validity or not of his "teaching".

and there you compare him to a power guru

all those who bring a teaching are gurus (in the etymological sense) whether it is pleasant or not because of the sect that is attached to it, by others who teach equally. After they will have more or less impact according to this teaching precisely, but also and especially by the implementation of it (otherwise it is useless!) Hence the parallel with Did in the spirit of the approach, not completely of the subject itself.
now we must not prejudge what has not yet been expressed, so wait for his speech to be fully developed. and his usual opponents (those who do not practice) will be happy to criticize this one.

NB: remember Ahmed's signature: "Do not believe what I say to you"in clear, check the content!

2 phase: My god, what a horror! It will have to change his habits!

Sorry janic but it's a lot of blabla (already seen, already known ...) and absurd posturing from a self proclaimed "specialist" ... but should we expect more from a "Casasnovas"?

In short, a youtuber who likes to watch himself talk ... he would do well to self diagnose: