After Daniel Nahon: "While the soil, the fertile bedrock which has enabled humanity's adventure and the conquest of our planet, is drying up and can no longer, at the rate of its erosion, feed the nine or ten billion individuals that our societies will carry around the middle of the XNUMXst century! " (The exhaustion of the Earth, the stake of the XXI ° century, edition Odile Jacob).
According to the biologist Wilson, by sacrificing natural habitats for the benefit of agriculture (sacrifice of natural hedges for the benefit of monoculture), not to mention the leaching of arable layers of the soil, we cause the extinction of species comparable to that dinosaurs. We do not have the right to speak of sustainable development for the countries of the North, but of "sustainable retreats". "Sustainable development" concerns exclusively countries where famine and malnutrition are rife.
"We are not the first, other societies have exhausted their resources, to the point of endangering their own survival. But some have been able to react in time: There is no environmental determinism. Human groups who have survived had made better choices. "
Whether on Easter Island or about the Anasazi Indians or the Mayans or the Vikings of Greenland, they all disappeared on the same principle despite their cultural differences: Increase in population, wealth and resources ransacked including forests, civilization involving the construction of gigantic edifices (to the disproportion of the EGO of human nature) in turn involving deforestation again involving depletion of resources: This is exactly what is happening with our modern societies despite our "evolution". Human nature learns nothing from its mistakes, it is governed by systemic processes: This is why there are always wars. Yet the inhabitants of Tikopia and the Japanese of the Tokugawa era survived: They made use of the technique of observation / contemplation. They regulated themselves strongly in terms of cutting, reforested by selecting productive varieties useful to humans by excluding animals that consume too much plants, put late marriage effectively limiting births (currently in Europe, the length of the studies actually make it possible to delay the installation as a couple and therefore limit births (hence the current problem of the renewal of generations in rich countries) and social gaps are reduced.
THERE MUST BE A FOOD HYPERPRODUCTIVITY INVOLVING FOOD SELF-SUFFICIENCY INVOLVING THE ENRICHMENT OF POOR COUNTRIES INVOLVING DEMOGRAPHIC STABILITY THEN REDUCING THE RATE OF NATALITY AS IN ALL RICH COUNTRIES: The Gaïa project.
For 10.000 years, humans have chosen to settle in areas favorable to their development where they have cultivated and raised animals. Humanity has therefore settled along ocean coasts, along rivers and in fertile areas: These areas are becoming more and more inhospitable. Since December 21, 2007, humans can practice cultivation outside these favorable areas: Gaïa agriculture and fish farming.
According to Gandhi, when you have doubts about a decision, you have to think of the poorest person you have ever met in order to know if the decision you have to make will be able to relieve this person or not . He also said that only education can bring non-violence. It should be noted, however, that as long as 35% of Indians suffer starvation and malnutrition, they will not be able to benefit from education. The eradication of famine and malnutrition will therefore allow education for All.
Agriculture / fish farming Gaïa (based on the Gaïa hypothesis of James Lovelock and Natural Agriculture of Masanobu Fukuoka) allows a hyper food productivity (in order to support the demographic growth of 9 billion human beings in 2050) with a quality label superior to the AB label while taking care of these damaged lands. This practice over a few years will be enough to create / recreate the topsoil for healthy and natural agriculture:
It is an incompressible emergency method which allows the simultaneous bilateral action of land care and food self-sufficiency anywhere on the planet while having a transversal action such as the balance of wealth thus bringing about a significant change. in the antagonistic geopolitical stakes making it possible to effectively limit the retrospections inherent in global warming.
Gaia farming and fish farming allows to infuse the energy of ignition allowing the beginning of the Gaia project which will be self-regulated by the different actors.
The Gaïa project therefore makes it possible to legally and peacefully impose the concrete and immediate implementation of intergovernmental resolutions taken and ratified (in favor of "sustainable development" and human rights) such as Kyoto, Grenelle and food sovereignty (which designates "the right of populations, of their States or Union to define their agricultural and food policy without dumping towards third countries") by proposing to the governments signatory of the Gaïa contract food self-sufficiency in 2 years and enrichment pure and simple from the third year.
The Gaïa project will be triggered by the signing of the first Gaïa contract.
The Gaïa contract can be validated and ratified without exception by all governments
(even by governments in exile).
1)The governments signatory to the Gaïa contract benefit from:
-The food self-sufficiency of all their fellow citizens in 2 years involving access to drinking water.
- Pure and simple enrichment from the third year by having a monopoly among plants with high added values such as Saffron (1kg of Saffron = 25.000 euros, more expensive than Gold).
2)The enrichment of poor countries will allow:
-The stabilization and then the decrease in the birth rate (as in all rich countries).
-National and regional economic development.
-The grouping of several countries with common interests such as water sharing.
-A geopolitical balance.
This balance will be based on water, energy, food as common goods of Humanity while putting priority on the preservation of the planet, at least what will remain to be preserved and in the event of climatic disasters and / or the current antagonistic geopolitical stakes do not involve, as the CIA foresees, a bacteriological and / or nuclear war (with nuclear fusion bombs, it is possible to detonate planet Earth several times) before 2050: arrangements are already being made by the powerful, notably by building a global seed vault. Stabilization of the Earth system (in particular by limiting the retrospects inherent in global warming) by tightly regulating the consumption of natural resources and pollution, with sanctions of economic boycott, the most effective argument, for governments that do not respect decisions taken by an absolute majority. Indeed, the economy linked to the monetary system will continue to exist as long as Man exists. Remember that money is the biggest belief and therefore the biggest sect in the world: Money is universal.
Mother Nature's anger can only be appeased at the cost of a radical change in current geopolitics. This radical change is probably not enough: Hurricane, Cyclone, Tsunami, Drought causing famine and disease, are phenomena whose function is to maintain the self-regulation of the Earth system. In fact, violent tropical storms allow nutrients to rise to the surface of the water, allowing algae to thrive and therefore limit the greenhouse effect: This involves more and more emergencies like Hurricane Katrina. The increase in the power and frequencies of these climatic phenomena originates from the retrospections inherent in global warming, the origin of which is due to the addition of the greenhouse effect. Only these disasters mainly affect poor countries, excluding poor countries have not contributed to the addition of the greenhouse effect because they do not pollute unlike rich countries, rich countries which already suffer the same disasters. Only the northern regions could benefit (temporarily) from global warming.
The most peaceful, quickest and most reliable method of action to limit the inevitable catastrophe whose deadline is less than 50 years is to encourage governments to act locally in 2 years: The Gaïa contract.
The invention No. 07 / 09068 is offered to Humanity under the conditions AG: 0% of chemical fertilizers, 0% of chemical pesticides, 0% of GMOs. This is why this invention is currently protected internationally (and will continue to be protected for 20 years). The trademark registration and private label AG will soon contribute to further strengthen the legal protection of this invention. Active hunting against counterfeiting is done by each Gaia association of each country signing the Gaia contract. Indeed, each Gaia association (whose members are necessarily of the nationality of the country) is independent and therefore protects its national market. In addition, the establishment of agriculture / fish farming Gaia can be simply followed by google earth.
The Gaia project has funding from 0 euros: bamboo and sun are free.
"The land should belong to the one who cultivates it (but the reality is quite different) that is why the Gaia agricultural machine belongs to the one who builds it and who respects the AG conditions."
