I did say that until maturation the storage / storage posed no problem!
izentrop wrote:As for the vitamins and nutrients lost over time, would you have a serious document with measured quantification of losses over time as a function of temperature?
It is rather for those who claim to be able to keep them without loss, to prove that they could!
Already the rate of acidity and sugar varies, it is already an irrefutable biochemical element of alteration / maturation. The appearance of spots on the skin and so many other alterations (including taste) are so many others.
izentrop wrote:Because if after 2 months 50% of vitamins are missing, it does not matter if it is sufficient for our needs.
You answer your own question by admitting a degradation of said nutrients.
Whether it be "
sufficient"(or not) is another question to evaluate at the orthomolecular level. It is precisely part of my job.
If you want, and if you allow the analogy: when you see cows grazing in a field, they eat practically all day without interruption. So yes losing 50% of nutrients in the meals of a human which boils down to 3x 40 minutes per day (if all goes well) makes the remainder insufficient (even if it does not cause instant death, it is clear that it is harmful in the long run, especially in an elderly subject ...)
I could multiply the examples and arguments ...
As for freezing, it is precisely the mode of conservation which causes the least loss (the Canadians of which the author of the thread is a part should know this, given the temperatures that prevail there throughout the year). Regarding precisely the power consumption of a freezer in Canada, I think it should not be very high !!! LOL ...
And the reflection is incorrectly formulated with regard to the price, because we should be able to compare the health benefits of freezing and not exclusively VS the loss of vitamins due to a less appropriate mode of preservation!