You said "Food additives" Mmmmmhh

Consumption and sustainable and responsible diet tips daily to reduce energy and water consumption, waste ... Eat: preparations and recipes, find healthy food, seasonal and local conservation information food ...
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839

You said "Food additives" Mmmmmhh




by Flytox » 02/01/11, 21:07

Found in my emails, without guarantee on the authenticity and with no supported argument, but some will know how to amend to draw some lessons from it ....

https://www.econologie.info/share/partag ... Ejzl6Z.pdf

(Correction: Sorry, in fact, this document will not come from Villejuif Hospital at all as he claims, see next post)

Edit by modo, copied pasted from the link: http://www.igr.fr/fr/page/communique-su ... ntaires_12 (thank you Delnoram)

Food additives press release

FOOD ADDITIVES: THE DEVELOPMENT OF IGR


A document on food additives, "distributed by the Villejuif hospital", has been circulating for many years.

This anonymous document, which includes a list of substances including nearly twenty described as "toxic" "carcinogenic" and 25 as "suspect", disseminates false information on food additives.

Its lying character is illustrated in particular by the case of the additive E330, presented as the most dangerous, when it is simply citric acid which exists in abundance in its natural state in citrus fruits.

The Gustave-Roussy Institute, located in Villejuif and formerly known as the "Cancer Institute", has stated on several occasions, through press releases, that it was completely foreign to the writing and distribution of this leaflet.

In addition, certain lists were distributed under the stamp of the Ministry of Health and the Family which had to file a complaint, at the time, for using false documents.

Although the origin and the cause of these diffusions are not clarified, this case has the effect of casting a doubt in the minds of consumers on the authorization procedures for the use of additives.

The Ministry of Health has regularly reminded for 20 years that France is one of the few countries to practice the system of positive lists in this area, that is to say that it is prohibited to use, in food human and animal, any additive (colorant, preservative, etc.) which is not on the official lists of authorization for use.

The public body responsible for checking the presence of additives in food products is:

The Directorate General for Competition, Consumption and Fraud Prevention

It is therefore possible to contact this service for more details.

IGR, June 2002
Last edited by Flytox the 02 / 01 / 11, 21: 53, 1 edited once.
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.
[Eugène Ionesco]
http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
User avatar
delnoram
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 1322
Registration: 27/08/05, 22:14
Location: Mâcon-Tournus
x 2




by delnoram » 02/01/11, 21:11

Uh yes a small amendment is necessary

http://www.igr.fr/fr/page/communique-su ... ntaires_12
0 x
"Thinking should not it be taught in school rather than to make learning by heart the facts that are not all proven?"
"It's not because they are likely to be wrong they are right!" (Coluche)
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 02/01/11, 21:32

Mouarf! Yes it is very serious, much more serious if we add the rest ...!

There are the additives which are added to the other serious chemical tracks of the additives, there are the POPs that enter the body and that are known to be lethal by combination in some cases (not just cancer, there is a trail around AIDS and other orphan and / or autoimmune diseases).

What was worth in negligible quantities in the 60s gradually took on unexpected proportions. Since. There are no less than 4000 new chemical substances which are born every year to such an extent that the EC had to legislate (with REACH).

Mathematically, a small calculation over 20 years ... this represents 80 chemicals which can be found for some in crossed chemical combinations in the body. Real time bombs, a kind of «Seveso» which is dormant and whose consequences we absolutely do not know.

The health problems that this implies appear, here or there, in the form of previously unknown diseases or even sometimes allergies which can lead to confused diagnoses, and ultimately to a fatal outcome (immunopathology). You have to apply the precautionary principle to yourself ... And don't buy anything or accumulate too much ...
0 x
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 02/01/11, 21:36

Excellent Delnoram, I didn't find this fix very important.
The moderators? Do I have to edit and transfer this post or not?
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.

[Eugène Ionesco]

http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
User avatar
delnoram
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 1322
Registration: 27/08/05, 22:14
Location: Mâcon-Tournus
x 2




by delnoram » 02/01/11, 21:40

Personally I would say leave it.

With the fix behind it, it speaks volumes about the seriousness of this document, right?
0 x
"Thinking should not it be taught in school rather than to make learning by heart the facts that are not all proven?"

"It's not because they are likely to be wrong they are right!" (Coluche)
User avatar
Flytox
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 14138
Registration: 13/02/07, 22:38
Location: Bayonne
x 839




by Flytox » 02/01/11, 21:55

The post has been edited, it should pass : Cry: :| : Mrgreen:
0 x
Reason is the madness of the strongest. The reason for the less strong it is madness.

[Eugène Ionesco]

http://www.editions-harmattan.fr/index. ... te&no=4132
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 02/01/11, 22:57

Here is the list defined by a European Union directive:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_ ... imentaires
0 x
dedeleco
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 9211
Registration: 16/01/10, 01:19
x 10




by dedeleco » 03/01/11, 00:21

Example the E127 red pink dye is authorized in France and Europe, but prohibited in the USA considered carcinogenic and other dangers !!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erythrosine

So compare additives and drugs, between different countries to know better !!

Thus, by comparing the authorizations between countries, the pick would never have been taken !!
0 x
User avatar
Obamot
Econologue expert
Econologue expert
posts: 28725
Registration: 22/08/09, 22:38
Location: regio genevesis
x 5538




by Obamot » 03/01/11, 10:49

delnoram wrote:
delnoram wrote:Personally I would say leave it.

With the fix behind it, it speaks volumes about the doubt of the seriousness of this document, no?
Uh yes a small amendment is necessary

http://www.igr.fr/fr/page/communique-su ... ntaires_12
Can we really have more confidence in the official list than the other? I am far from being sure, I am even convinced of the contrary. That the dissenting list does not come from "Villejuif", let us take into account but that does not even prove that it is true.

Take the very controversial example of the E330: it would be a perfect syllogism to say that "Because it would be citric acid it would be harmless and non-carcinogenic by nature". This for a few good reasons:

1) the loss of the acid / basic balance of the organism is one of the precursors of degenerative diseases of which cancer and AIDS are a part. So classifying a synthetic acidifier in the list of "candidates" is entirely correct. But in this case it would be necessary to put ALL the acidifiers there. And there, neither the official list nor the "Dissident" would not be satisfactory.

2) if we speak of vitamin "C" (ascorbic acid), the natural chemical formula is not the same as the chemical. But in "firefighter medicine" (opposite but complementary to the holistic) it can be used in high doses as a catalyst (etc), on the other hand adding it to the diet if it is already balanced has absolutely no nutritional value. , since absorbed in excess it will be rejected (the body taking only what it needs).

3) from memory: it is overlooked the fact that natural lemon juice is one of the rare acids to transform into base in the body by physical effort! While the chemical formula as a food additive ...

It does not matter, "it's the dose that makes the poison" will you tell me according to REACH, the dose has already been reached for a long time in many cases! And all refined dishes are not recommended, let alone if they have additives that can deceive your body and confuse your immune system. No need to add to the "existing pollutants" present in the environment, directly through our mouths, because even if they are judged as harmless we do not know their interactions when crossing with other synthetic products. Conversely, the "natural model" has proven itself for millions (billions?) Of years, our organism "(re) knows them" ...

The "receptors" of the organism are not intended to receive "decoys" ... by dint of "disturbing" them we play with fire ...

What should we deduce? Eat fresh and raw or cooked vegetables and fruits, preferably steamed (without excessive processing).
0 x
Christophe
Moderator
Moderator
posts: 79117
Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
Location: Greenhouse planet
x 10972




by Christophe » 03/01/11, 12:46

Flytox wrote:The post has been edited, it should pass : Cry: :| : Mrgreen:


+1

And I think it is useful to "copy / paste" the content of the delnoram link in the 1st post that I therefore edited!

Idea of ​​resolution for 2011: stop forwarding rotten mailings!

Nevertheless, Flytox, the problem of food additives is a serious problem ... so you did well to make it a subject!

We already had this subject: https://www.econologie.com/forums/liste-des- ... t8294.html
Last edited by Christophe the 16 / 09 / 11, 09: 17, 1 edited once.
0 x

 


  • Similar topics
    Replies
    views
    Last message

Back to "Sustainable consumption: responsible consumption, diet tips and tricks"

Who is online ?

Users browsing this forum : No registered users and 97 guests