I am taking advantage of a UFC statement to launch a debate on energy liberalization.
While the "free" market (unregulated prices) is already open to professionals, the UFC Que Choose publishes a distressing press release for new operators ...
Énergies bill: The consumer trap
While all the attention is focused on the SUEZ / GDF merger, the UFC-Que Choisir denounces the real trap set for consumers in the bill.
From the 1 July 2007, any consumer of electricity and / or gas who has chosen to engage with a supplier on the market where prices are free will no longer be able to benefit from the regulated tariff for gas or gas. electricity except when moving.
The government intends to lock up the consumer and make it the guinea pig of the reform because he knows, as analysts of the sector, that price slippage is more than likely in the medium term.
In the next 5 years, these markets will be open to competition in the law but certainly not in reality!
On the contrary, EDF and GDF do not have to fear competition and will be free to take advantage of their dominant position because:
1- The export capacity of other European countries is weak or non-existent,
2- Electricity and gas interconnection networks are already saturated, limiting the possibilities of exports,
3- The few potentially competing companies charge prices in their respective markets which are not very competitive, ie higher than those of EDF or GDF on the French market.
Consumers do not want to live the bitter experience of some companies that have chosen to subscribe to an offer on the unregulated market that has experienced an increase in their 73% electric bills in less than two years, without being able to "backtrack".
The current text will also and consequently create an unacceptable unequal treatment between consumers benefiting from the regulated tariff and those permanently locked in markets (gas and electricity) with high inflation risk.
For UFC-Que Choisir, as long as the conditions for real competition are not met, the government must allow consumers to benefit from the regulated tariff at any time.
Energy liberalization: the false good idea?
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Energy liberalization: the false good idea?
Last edited by Christophe the 07 / 11 / 06, 10: 34, 2 edited once.
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Here are the "free" operators that I know:
1) For Belgium:
Citypower: http://www.citypower.be/fr/citypower_home.htm
Essent: http://www.essent.be/maison/
SPE: http://www.spe.be/Index-fr.cfm
Lampiris: http://www.lampiris.be/home.html
The 4 offer "green" electricity offers but is this electricity really green because selling renewable, in some cases, cheaper (at least on paper) than the nuclear operator Electrabel (subsidiary of Suez in fact) is not at all credible (at least from an econologist point of view).
2) For France:
1) Direct-Energy: http://www.direct-energie.com/ (Offer green electricity: http://www.direct-energie.com/offre_energie_purjus.php )
2) Enercoop: http://www.enercoop.fr/
A special mention for Enercoop that seems the most credible in providing green energy in really (see their partners: http://www.enercoop.ouvaton.org/societaires.php ) ... Now how real costs ( http://www.enercoop.fr/images/files/tar ... ercoop.pdf ) And for which reliable sourcing?
1) For Belgium:
Citypower: http://www.citypower.be/fr/citypower_home.htm
Essent: http://www.essent.be/maison/
SPE: http://www.spe.be/Index-fr.cfm
Lampiris: http://www.lampiris.be/home.html
The 4 offer "green" electricity offers but is this electricity really green because selling renewable, in some cases, cheaper (at least on paper) than the nuclear operator Electrabel (subsidiary of Suez in fact) is not at all credible (at least from an econologist point of view).
2) For France:
1) Direct-Energy: http://www.direct-energie.com/ (Offer green electricity: http://www.direct-energie.com/offre_energie_purjus.php )
2) Enercoop: http://www.enercoop.fr/
A special mention for Enercoop that seems the most credible in providing green energy in really (see their partners: http://www.enercoop.ouvaton.org/societaires.php ) ... Now how real costs ( http://www.enercoop.fr/images/files/tar ... ercoop.pdf ) And for which reliable sourcing?
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
I do not know what will be for consumers in July 2007, but I want to point out that this article is not valid for the current situation in the market accessible to professionals:
On gas and electricity, unregulated tariffs remain generally lower than those of EDF / GDF.
Moreover, the fact for individuals to go elsewhere that would force to abandon the regulated tariff, I have doubts because for companies, many operators offer both regulated and non-regulated tariffs. And frankly ... if it's to stay at the regulated price, what's the point of changing the supplier?
I think the UFC is going a bit quick ...
And, frankly, if unregulated prices were to climb, would it not just be a return to reality, where we will pay for energy at its true price? I think it's pretty good.
On gas and electricity, unregulated tariffs remain generally lower than those of EDF / GDF.
Moreover, the fact for individuals to go elsewhere that would force to abandon the regulated tariff, I have doubts because for companies, many operators offer both regulated and non-regulated tariffs. And frankly ... if it's to stay at the regulated price, what's the point of changing the supplier?
I think the UFC is going a bit quick ...
And, frankly, if unregulated prices were to climb, would it not just be a return to reality, where we will pay for energy at its true price? I think it's pretty good.
0 x
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Rulian wrote:On gas and electricity, unregulated tariffs remain generally lower than those of EDF / GDF.
Source?
Rulian wrote:... many operators offer both regulated and non-regulated tariffs. And frankly ... if it's to stay at the regulated price, what's the point of changing the supplier?
I think that going to see another operator implies precisely to move to deregulation so I do not really understand your remark ... the fact is that the alternative operator give their best rates ... well I think that it works like this ...
Regulation, by definition, is the state control of tariffs ... when we move to a non-public operator the state has nothing more to say ... where worries ...
Rulian wrote:... would it not just be a return to reality, where we will pay for energy at its true price? I think it's pretty good.
Paying green energy at the right price, but paying nuclear or coal at the price of renewable energy is limiting the development of its last ... I'm wrong? So as much sign all at enercoop ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
No it is not possible technically ... on the other hand we can lock some and redirect to other ...
Nevertheless, for me, the GDF-Suez merger has to be seen only very far with the opening of the market to the competition ... because when the employees Gdf will no longer be civil servant (at least in the head) it is not tomorrow the day before ...
Finally: let them deregulate and "fuck" the consumer quietly ... It will come only faster to econology
And as our dear technocrats will never control the solar or the wood ... you follow my thought?
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Christophe wrote:Nevertheless, for me, the merger GDF-Suez has to see only very far with the opening of the market to the competition ...
In fact, I may have chosen the wrong title, but it is rather a very particular part of the bill associated with this merger, which deals precisely with the results of this deregulation.
0 x
"Anyone who believes that exponential growth can continue indefinitely in a finite world is a fool, or an economist." KEBoulding
-
- Moderator
- posts: 79360
- Registration: 10/02/03, 14:06
- Location: Greenhouse planet
- x 11060
Targol wrote:In fact, I may have chosen the wrong title, but it is rather a very particular part of the bill associated with this merger, which deals precisely with the results of this deregulation.
Yes I read in detail after reading the title and write my message (not good I know) so I locked the subject 2 in question and redirected to the subject that was already more ...
0 x
Do a image search or an text search - Netiquette of forum
Christophe wrote:Rulian wrote:On gas and electricity, unregulated tariffs remain generally lower than those of EDF / GDF.
Source?
Er, how do you say ... you're going to kill me ... I wanted to talk to you about it but I did not get you on msn ... I have a taf, finally.
And it is a box that makes the energy diagnosis and advice on purchasing energy. So the summary documents on the market offers, I read them because it is a working tool. (All you have to do is look up the price schedules of the different suppliers.) When to Enercoop it turns out to be average prices.
I agree with you, changing operator to stay at the regulated rate has no interest other than to eventually change the prices of ancillary services. But I believe that some new operators offer contracts at the regulated tariff ... I would try to check tomorrow.Christophe wrote:I think that going to see another operator implies precisely to move to deregulation so I do not really understand your remark ... the fact is that the alternative operator give their best rates ... well I think that it works like this ...
See above in this message, Enercoop does not return frankly more expensive than another. Hoping that he will make an offer for individuals in 2007.Christophe wrote:Paying green energy at the right price, but paying nuclear or coal at the price of renewable energy is limiting the development of its last ... I'm wrong? So as much sign all at enercoop ...
0 x
- elephant
- Econologue expert
- posts: 6646
- Registration: 28/07/06, 21:25
- Location: Charleroi, center of the world ....
- x 7
And it's not just the prices: in Chatelet (Belgium between Namur and Charleroi), there is a hairdresser who was passed on another operator.
For almost a year, she waited until Electrabel (who remains the owner of his meter) wants to strengthen its connection, meanwhile, great galley to have hot water ......
It's also the same problem if you are connected to an "alternative" telephone operator (versatel, scarlett, etc ...): as soon as an operation depends on Belgacom, for example a line repair, hello delays .
For almost a year, she waited until Electrabel (who remains the owner of his meter) wants to strengthen its connection, meanwhile, great galley to have hot water ......
It's also the same problem if you are connected to an "alternative" telephone operator (versatel, scarlett, etc ...): as soon as an operation depends on Belgacom, for example a line repair, hello delays .
0 x
elephant Supreme Honorary éconologue PCQ ..... I'm too cautious, not rich enough and too lazy to really save the CO2! http://www.caroloo.be
-
- Similar topics
- Replies
- views
- Last message
-
- 2 Replies
- 22723 views
-
Last message by boubka
View the latest post
26/08/09, 11:05A subject posted in the forum : Fossil fuels: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)
-
- 11 Replies
- 37020 views
-
Last message by Woodcutter
View the latest post
01/09/07, 09:40A subject posted in the forum : Fossil fuels: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)
-
- 0 Replies
- 20332 views
-
Last message by Christophe
View the latest post
04/07/07, 16:32A subject posted in the forum : Fossil fuels: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)
-
- 33 Replies
- 67979 views
-
Last message by thibr
View the latest post
06/03/19, 18:25A subject posted in the forum : Fossil fuels: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)
Go back to "Fossil energies: oil, gas, coal and nuclear electricity (fission and fusion)"
Who is online ?
Users browsing this forum : Majestic-12 [Bot] and 358 guests