forums energies: society, ecology and clean technologies

Here is an interesting document from the IPCC of synthesis on "the burying" of industrial CO2.

Quick summary: https://www.econologie.com/stockage-et-p ... -3126.html

Complete document: https://www.econologie.com/comment-stock ... -3922.html

To relate to the Castor project: https://www.econologie.com/projet-castor ... -2730.html

So there is no shortage of solutions ... simply we can ask ourselves what will force manufacturers to apply these technologies?

Um,

I would say a political will, climatic events are gaining enormously.

a significant cost per tonne of CO2 (Kyoto), the people are the first to reduce the taxes that bother them by any means

empowerment of decision-makers / leaders (which is not necessarily utopian).

For this I read an interview in the "Spiegel" of a former Shell executive currently in charge of Repower, a German wind turbine manufacturer, who is counting on this process to get by and sees the development of this technology in next decades, he adds that the atom is a technology that will allow the transition.

I see on the maps that the storage possibilities in China are very low compared to the coal they use.

I completely agree with this gentleman, only a transition from "fixed" applications to nuclear power in order to keep the oil for mobile applications and chemistry seems possible.

Strongly the applications of the z-machine for non-polluting fusion power plants, and that we let nature store the co2 in plants. With energy galore, why not also give a helping hand to nature by transforming the co2 into carbon and oxygen?

freddau wrote:For this I read an interview in the "Spiegel" of a former Shell executive currently in charge of Repower, a German wind turbine manufacturer, who is counting on this process to get by and sees the development of this technology in next decades, he adds that the atom is a technology that will allow the transition.

Nice retraining (is it good for morale?) But I think there is only one thing that interests such a person: the cash ...

Cuicui wrote:Strongly the applications of the z-machine for non-polluting fusion power plants ...

Arf you still believe hard as iron ...

Beliefs, it's not so much my thing, it goes, it comes and there are as many as there are on the planet.
What interests me are the facts. If the results of the z-machine are not confirmed, I risk only the ridiculous, and it has been a long time since it killed rain, otherwise the human species would have disappeared.
But if it is a reality, and for the moment the facts seem to confirm it, the stake is so formidable that I will not forgive myself for having missed it.
It is on your site that Logan gave us the info, thank you all.
For newcomers,
http://french.epochtimes.com/news/6-7-17/4604.html

Cuicui wrote:It is on your site that Logan gave us the info, thank you all.
For newcomers,
http://french.epochtimes.com/news/6-7-17/4604.html

Finally a synthetic article ... a new one in perspective?

Too bad the sources are always the same: Petit and Sandia ... I repeat that the opinion of a CEA physicist would be welcome ...

Christophe said:
I therefore repeat that the opinion of a CEA physicist would be welcome.


If he is a fervent supporter of Iter, he risks being in bad faith concerning the z-machine.

Cuicui wrote:If he is a fervent supporter of Iter, he risks being in bad faith concerning the z-machine.

The plot is not everywhere sorry ...
Good then the opinion of a nuclear physicist that would suit me too ... even a student would like!