Compact nuclear fusion in 10 years? Lockheed Martin
published: 16/10/14, 12:01
by jean.caissepas
published: 16/10/14, 12:46
by Mireille90
"A compact reactor that would be ten times more efficient"? it's possible? ... It would obviously be a very nice project that deserves to be done in my opinion
published: 16/10/14, 13:05
by elephant
Let's not forget that "some" suspect Lockheed of having access to alien technologies
published: 17/10/14, 23:16
by Christophe
published: 17/10/14, 23:33
by Obamot
Don't you have an alien?
published: 17/10/14, 23:43
by Christophe
But do not dream,
even if it works, it will not work!
I understand
published: 21/10/14, 23:27
by Capt_Maloche
Don't be pessimistic
between the two there is the cold fusion, do you know the e-cat?
http://www.wikistrike.com/2014/10/fusio ... boite.html
I'm going to ask a little bit to see what we're talking about
published: 22/10/14, 00:13
by Christophe
Beautiful synthetic image!
Capt_Maloche wrote:Don't be pessimistic
Realistic ... do you want to talk about the boss of Total?
https://www.econologie.com/forums/christophe ... 13508.htmlCapt_Maloche wrote:between the two there is the cold fusion, do you know the e-cat?
Houlà it's been a while since you have not come here my Maloche!
We've broken it down pretty much in every way here:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/reaction-d ... 10384.html And there:
https://www.econologie.com/forums/e-cat-d-an ... 13049.html
About 900 posts on the subject !!
published: 22/10/14, 00:20
by izentrop
Now this is the
Z-Machine that makes people talk about it. Also owned by Lockheed Martin;)
published: 22/10/14, 00:44
by Christophe