Millions of watts generated from the water?

[jean.caissepas]

The company BlackLight Power announced Wednesday that it has produced several million watts of electricity in its laboratories thanks to a revolutionary technology, patent pending, called "Solid Fuel-Catalyst-Induced-Hydrino-Transition (SF-CIHT)".

The use of a specific solid fuel, water-based, confined by the two electrodes of a SF-CIHT battery, and to which an intensity of 12.000 amperes is applied, ignites the water by producing an extraordinary electric flash. Fuel is thus able to be continuously supplied to the electrodes to continuously generate electricity.

BlackLight produced millions of watts of electricity in a volume of ten thousandths of a liter, which represents a staggering power density exceeding 10 billion watts per liter. For comparison, a liter of 'BlackLight' source of electricity could produce as much electricity as a power plant with a power higher than that of the 4 old reactors of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, theater of a of the greatest nuclear disasters in history.

Millions of watts generated from a water-based fuel!

To be checked by specialists ...

Link : http://www.enerzine.com/603/16801+des-millions-de-watts-generes-a-partir-dun-carburant-a-base-deau+.html

[Did67]

The idea that water is a "waste" of the oxidation of organic matter is difficult to impose ... And suddenly, an "ingredient" of photosynthesis, with CO² ...

So here, everything is to know how much electricity (or energy) they put [to maintain the operation of the device or to produce this "miraculous water"] to produce how much ???

Simple example: I electrolyze water; this consumes 1 kWh; I get oxygen and hydrogen, I put them in an internal combustion engine that produces 000 kWh.

I can make a shattering announcement that I obtained 500 kWh from water [to be credible, I put in place a whole jumble, I add a secret miracle product ... in short I am staging ]

For the article, announcing "millions of watts generated" is already being blurred between power and energy. This does not bode well for the reliability of the information !!!

Generally, a device:

- "a" or "develops" a power of so many watts (or multiple: kW, MW, GW ...)

- "produces" an energy of so many watt.hours (or multiple kW.h, MW.h in short, a power per time).

So when I see a unit salad, I understand it from a forumeur lambda who intrigues me on his boiler.

When we announce a great energy "revolution", the least of schoes is to understand something (I am talking about the editor of the article; no jean.caissepas, who quotes him).

Now, if there is a revolutionary system, we will have to be more precise so that we can say something. For me, the blur benefits the doubt ...

[raymon]

I had already put the link in the early morning I had classified it in cold fusion There would be an independent verification.

[Remundo]

it reminds me of Jean Louis Naudin's short circuits ...

[Janic]

how much energy does it take to ignite a pocket of gas?
Or an explosive? The difficulty is not the product itself but the way in which this release of energy can be controlled!
That said, it is better for the phenomenon to be complex because, given the amount of water there is on earth, it could cause a boom!

[elephant]

The link does not work, but it is announced on the company website:

http://www.blacklightpower.com/

[Surfeurseb]

Hallelujah my brothers, we are saved!

In fact, it took 12000 amps, and worse that was it. Now water has become a fuel, that's good, we're full of it.
(and then when there will be more, there will be only to capture comets full of water).

"an intensity of 12.000 amperes, ignites the water by producing an extraordinary electric flash"

Uh ... assuming we ignite the main components of the water, but separated: H2 and O2, we get H2O, water
so, among other things, and a nice explosion. But no electricity.

"Fuel is thus able to be continuously supplied to the electrodes to continuously produce electricity"
Damn!

In summary: flaming water produces water, and electricity. Without loss?

Seriously

A profession for the future: mythoduweb

[Remundo]

yes, it is completely ... "smoky".

@+

[Janic]

to complete with this other article
http://www.enerzine.com/603/10894+la-re ... ntox+.html
The hydrino is not new, but its mastery was not acquired. So it seems that in this case it is here.
As for septics (damn, I forgot a C this formulation is therefore pit! ) this recalls the skepticism concerning many predecessors, including the Pantone system which this site has also relayed and whose existence Quanthomme site.

[raymon]

this recalls the skepticism concerning many predecessors, including the Pantone system which this site has also relayed and whose existence Quanthomme site.

Absolutely.
I remind you that it is not a question of combustion but of cold fusion and there are a large number of successful experiments. Blacklightpower exaggerates or perhaps did not invent anything but the reaction "cold fusion" exists!