forums energies: society, ecology and clean technologies

published: **18/10/10, 21:28**

The taxpayer has just put 900 million euros for the 4th generation nuclear reactor:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTex ... rieLien=id

Budget problems you say?

published: **19/10/10, 00:23**

And so the taxpayer pays to have a little more in France sooner or later a future Chernobyl, since men are not foolproof and the worst disaster will happen sooner or later !!

Urban artist we will eat more and more irradiated foods without telling us, foods stuffed with oxidants created by irradiation and without vitamins destroyed by irradiation, while we are recommended to eat these foods for their vitamins and their antioxidant power, before irradiation, which destroys all their interest and not only the microbes which shorten the storage time if not irradiated !!
http://www.irradiation-aliments.org/Cam ... n-des.html

http://groupes.sortirdunucleaire.org/bl ... -la-hague/

Alert !!! The European health safety agency EFSA is preparing to issue an opinion on food irradiation, which is likely to allow, in the coming year, an upgrade of European regulations towards the Codex Alimentarius standard (latest revision in 2003) which authorizes and promotes the irradiation of all types of food, almost without dose limitation (in the event of "technological necessity").

published: **22/10/10, 00:40**

BNP finances a dangerous zero generation reactor before Chernobyl !!

And it is we the taxpayers of the French state who will pay the financial risks of a probable fiasco for the BNP which lends blind money, once again, thanks to the support of the States, without being able to 'properly analyze what it finances.

http://ouvavotreargent.com/

The BNP is currently studying its financial participation in the project to build a dangerous nuclear reactor at Angra dos Reis, 150 km from Rio.

Why call this project dangerous? The construction of this reactor started in 1984 and stopped in 1986, at the time of Chernobyl, due to the lack of international funding. While 70% of the reactor parts have been stored on site since that date, and the project corresponds to pre-Chernobyl safety standards, construction started again a few months ago, as if 25 years had not passed … because the funding is unlocked.

BNP has shown great irresponsibility on this subject. Greenpeace has explained to the bank the many risks of the project and is still waiting to know that an independent analysis will be conducted. The risk of a nuclear accident has not been considered, in total violation of international standards. We also know very well that Angra would not pass the examination: for example, there is only one evacuation route, regularly closed due to landslides.

BNP, world nuclear champion, hits the financial jackpot!

But then why get involved in such a dangerous project? Because BNP will not assume the financial risks linked to its investment. It is indeed the “nuclear states”, such as France, which issue state guarantees and assume these financial risks. The BNP therefore lends blind money, thanks to the support of the States, without being able to correctly analyze what it finances.

The BNP therefore finances blindly, since it is sure to always hit the jackpot. BNP carried out 13,5 billion euros in radioactive transactions between 2000 and 2009. BNP is the first bank in the world to finance the nuclear industry.

http://energie-climat.greenpeace.fr/gre ... -nucleaire

published: **22/10/10, 00:46**

Amazing! Notice that like that, there will be less pensions to pay : Evil:

published: **03/02/11, 19:31**

Mind-boggling you say?
Mmm no!
It's normal !

published: **07/08/12, 14:46**

Enerzine article of June 28, 2012 on ASTRID:

A prototype 4th generation nuclear reactor by 2020

published: **07/08/12, 15:39**

moinsdewatt wrote:Enerzine article of June 28, 2012 on ASTRID:
A prototype 4th generation nuclear reactor by 2020

You really have to be crazy to persist in the uranium fission chain, and use sodium as the heat transfer fluid.
The future lies in hydrogen-boron fusion nuclear, a clean, rustic and relatively inexpensive technique.
http://www.jp-petit.org/science/Z-machi ... chine2.htm

published: **07/08/12, 15:45**

netshaman wrote:Mind-boggling you say?
Mmm no!
It's normal !

What there is in common with nuclear power is that generations of reactors pass, but the dangers remain. : Evil:

published: **10/08/12, 12:22**

Cuicui wrote:
moinsdewatt wrote:Enerzine article of June 28, 2012 on ASTRID:
A prototype 4th generation nuclear reactor by 2020

You really have to be crazy to persist in the uranium fission chain, and use sodium as the heat transfer fluid.

What interests them is the development of the thorium sector which could give nearly 400 years of reserves.
In view of the oil recession, the "nucleocrats" are ready to do anything to maintain or even increase nuclear power in the global energy balance.
The idea is 3rd, 4th generation, then development of DEMO (continuation of ITER) by 2100, if it works one day maybe ...

published: **10/08/12, 23:20**

sen-no-sen wrote:The idea is 3rd, 4th generation, then development of DEMO (continuation of ITER) by 2100, if it works one day maybe ...

The deuterium-tritium fusion by magnetic confinement (ITER, DEMO) is not only radioactive, but constitutes a technological dead end because of disruptions which render the confinement unstable and damage the reactor walls. We know in advance that it cannot work.
The future is nuclear power plants with hydrogen-boron fusion by magnetic necking, a clean, rustic technique, achievable with current means, with abundant fuels and easy to find.
http://www.jp-petit.org/science/Z-machi ... chine2.htm

forums energies: society, ecology and clean technologies

4e generation nuclear reactor

4e generation nuclear reactor