Pantone project G + BMW E36 TDS: Motor M51
published: 26/02/16, 12:50
Hi everybody,
I'm going back to doing pantone on a diesel bmw tds (M51 engine (525 - 325 tds, 6 cylinders, 1 injectors piloted)), which I have not done since 2009 wholesale.
So I want to get up to speed and before I get into the adaptation on this engine and I noticed that now some coupled the venturi system with the pantone, does it improve efficiency according to you?
On the other hand, not having used this system in the long term, I have often wondered if the addition of this unstable hydrogen gas (this is how Kevin, a person well known in this field) me had "trained" (at the time and at his level of knowledge at the time)
(Unstable because when you put this gas in the bottle, it recondenses and becomes water, according to his words).
in short if the addition of this hydrogen gas, which improves the explosion (or auto ignition if you prefer) if I can say, did not use the diesel engine too much.
Of course there is depreciation if already we reduce the level of pollution (imbrulé) and if we make a substantial saving or partial (3 15% on average we say, but there certainly more precise returns) c is already not bad because it is also (and above all) a political and ecological act (since normally it is forbidden (existing jurisprudence? - grenelle of the environment - cop 21 - clean city, recycling, in short) ). Compared to an internal combustion engine.
Indeed, the use of the injection of hydro gas makes me think more of the gasifier, LPG, ethanol etc. ... as a substitute for gasoline or super.
I am equipped (TIG), I know the diagram, I have a little experience and a certain familiarization, I even organized (thanks to Kévin, friends and a certain "socio-economic" carelessness) a conference on the system pantone (in 2007) as well as a complete installation and (+ a few days for the boldest) adaptation on 5-6 cars (2Cv, golf II with golf III TD engine - renault 19 D, clio phase 1 gasoline and I forget a few others)
Then after the group of people split, life went on and I turned to the use of recycled oil (HVP - HVB :: golf II D or TD) and I moved .... (I wanted couple the two systems).
Now I'm going back to it, I'm going to prepare a few bits of information upstream and I'm taking all the advice :-)
Sorry to have been a bit long.
Good luck to all and a big thank you to the founder of the site (Marc Christophe I think) and all the others and participants and users of the site.
One last thing: Retrofit or vapocracking is for me used for some years in recent diesel engines with some slight differences on the goals (mainly pollution), by the car manufacturers (FAP engines for example) and blue motion on the heavy trucks .
What now, in my opinion, the pantone and sharp system, HHO etc., makes the facts mildly funny.
So "foutag **** mouth if I may say so (sorry for the popular expression).
I'm going back to doing pantone on a diesel bmw tds (M51 engine (525 - 325 tds, 6 cylinders, 1 injectors piloted)), which I have not done since 2009 wholesale.
So I want to get up to speed and before I get into the adaptation on this engine and I noticed that now some coupled the venturi system with the pantone, does it improve efficiency according to you?
On the other hand, not having used this system in the long term, I have often wondered if the addition of this unstable hydrogen gas (this is how Kevin, a person well known in this field) me had "trained" (at the time and at his level of knowledge at the time)
(Unstable because when you put this gas in the bottle, it recondenses and becomes water, according to his words).
in short if the addition of this hydrogen gas, which improves the explosion (or auto ignition if you prefer) if I can say, did not use the diesel engine too much.
Of course there is depreciation if already we reduce the level of pollution (imbrulé) and if we make a substantial saving or partial (3 15% on average we say, but there certainly more precise returns) c is already not bad because it is also (and above all) a political and ecological act (since normally it is forbidden (existing jurisprudence? - grenelle of the environment - cop 21 - clean city, recycling, in short) ). Compared to an internal combustion engine.
Indeed, the use of the injection of hydro gas makes me think more of the gasifier, LPG, ethanol etc. ... as a substitute for gasoline or super.
I am equipped (TIG), I know the diagram, I have a little experience and a certain familiarization, I even organized (thanks to Kévin, friends and a certain "socio-economic" carelessness) a conference on the system pantone (in 2007) as well as a complete installation and (+ a few days for the boldest) adaptation on 5-6 cars (2Cv, golf II with golf III TD engine - renault 19 D, clio phase 1 gasoline and I forget a few others)
Then after the group of people split, life went on and I turned to the use of recycled oil (HVP - HVB :: golf II D or TD) and I moved .... (I wanted couple the two systems).
Now I'm going back to it, I'm going to prepare a few bits of information upstream and I'm taking all the advice :-)
Sorry to have been a bit long.
Good luck to all and a big thank you to the founder of the site (Marc Christophe I think) and all the others and participants and users of the site.
One last thing: Retrofit or vapocracking is for me used for some years in recent diesel engines with some slight differences on the goals (mainly pollution), by the car manufacturers (FAP engines for example) and blue motion on the heavy trucks .
What now, in my opinion, the pantone and sharp system, HHO etc., makes the facts mildly funny.
So "foutag **** mouth if I may say so (sorry for the popular expression).