Page 1 on 12

Johnson magnetic motor

published: 27/08/04, 13:34
by Bibiphoque
:P
Here is the link, http://www.rexresearch.com/johnson/1johnson.htm' target = '_ blank'> http://www.rexresearch.com/johnson/1johnson.htm

That, we can really say that it is superunity !!! B) 0 w at input, and what we want at output depending on the size

In addition, it does not seem so complicated to build ... if you are equipped, of course!
:P
What do you think?
A+

published: 27/08/04, 19:01
by Rulian
Yep ... It won't be the first permanent magnetic field motor. In general it does not work (see the SMOT experiments of Naudin).

Should try.

published: 30/08/04, 14:53
by Bibiphoque
;)
Hello,
He even built it to patent it !, so it works!
A+

published: 05/09/05, 14:10
by Blasil10
Very interesting this link! that I just watched .. yet not yesterday! <_
Yes, indeed it seems to work "on its own" and to start on its own when the two external parts come closer .. three elements in parallel: assemblies with the magnets cast in the mass it seems. including for the two external parts .. there does not seem to be any external electrical connection ..? it seems too good not to want to check it: huh: .. the whole thing turns with a certain speed .. power ?? could lead to a lot of things ...? In any case assembly specialist or super "handyman" !!

published: 05/09/05, 14:58
by Bibiphoque
Hello,
The problem with this video is that it is a close-up of the gen, there is no proof that behind there is no training system, <_ <<_ <if instead of filming in "fixed, they had come from further away and turned around the machine, but not in close-up, then come back to the close-up, it would have been really intriguing, but there, sory, too easy to rig the thing. :P :P :P
@+B)

published: 05/09/05, 22:33
by Blasil10
B) that's really true ... here :D

Everything is possible .... ;)

published: 05/09/05, 23:09
by Jean-Francois
in + it was cut (the video) while the camera slowed down and what is funny it has qq tools next to the device

veiled voilou :P

published: 05/09/05, 23:19
by Christophe
Rather, let's focus on what works: HVB and / or water doping pantone ... Otherwise in 10 years we may not have moved a yota ... What do you think?

published: 06/09/05, 00:51
by Jean-Francois
econology wrote:Rather, let's focus on what works: HVB and / or water doping pantone ... Otherwise in 10 years we may not have moved a yota ... What do you think?

I think you are absolutely right: rolleyes:: rolleyes: ..... good go I go back to settle my pantone mounting problem before the air filter (grrrr bad damn this traffic mill)

published: 03/10/05, 14:01
by SAVOIE73
I think that for people who intend to change things, you are strangely conservative.
"We do not see the back of the machine ..." and then, it does not prove either one way or the other ... With this
kind of reasoning, we would still think that heavier than air can fly ...

A little less sucpiscion and a little more curiosity, kindness, that would be good.

When the price ... That I saw in another post ... Do you know that a 20 Kw domestic generator costs
within 7000 Euros? .... and you cry because the guys are unfortunate enough to offer a generator
using this process for 10 unhappy roros?

Be serious.


You don't spend 30 years of its existence proving something for the sole purpose of scamming people.

I think we have to go towards them, make noise, push them to make clearer demonstrations
sharper ... either ... Systematically wary of everything ... I find it a shame and as sectarian as
the energy and scientific lobbies against which we protest ...